Literature DB >> 24815063

Is quality improvement sustainable? Findings of the American College of Cardiology's Guidelines Applied in Practice.

Adesuwa B Olomu1, Manfred Stommel2, Margaret M Holmes-Rovner3, Andrew R Prieto4, William D Corser5, Venu Gourineni4, Kim A Eagle6.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: (i) To examine the sustainability of an in-hospital quality improvement (QI) intervention, the American College of Cardiology's Guideline Applied to Practice (GAP) in acute myocardial infarction (AMI). (ii) To determine the predictors of physician adherence to AMI guidelines-recommended medication prescribing.
DESIGN: Prospective observational study.
SETTING: Five mid-Michigan community hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: 516 AMI patients admitted consecutively 1 year after the GAP intervention. These patients were compared with 499 post-GAP patients. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The main outcome was adherence to medication use guidelines. Predictors of medication use were determined using multivariable logistic regression analysis.
RESULTS: 1 year after GAP implementation, adherence to most medications remained high. We found a significant increase in beta-blocker (BB) use in-hospital (87.9 vs. 72.1%, P < 0.001) whereas cholesterol assessment within 24 h (79.5 vs. 83.6%, P > 0.225) did not change significantly. However, discharge aspirin (83 vs. 90%, P < 0.018) and BB prescriptions (84 vs. 92%, P < 0.016) dropped to preintervention rates. Discharge angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor and treatment of patients with low-density lipoprotein of ≥ 100 were unchanged. Predictors of receiving appropriate medications were male gender (for aspirin and BBs) and treatment with percutaneous coronary intervention compared with coronary artery bypass graft. Notably, prescription rates for discharge medications differed significantly by hospital.
CONCLUSIONS: Early benefits of the Mid-Michigan GAP intervention on guideline use were only partially sustained at 1 year. Differences in guideline adherence by treatment modality and hospital demonstrate challenges for follow-up phases of GAP. Additional strategies to improve sustainability of QI efforts are urgently needed.
© The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press in association with the International Society for Quality in Health Care; all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adherence to medications; cardiovascular disease, disease categories; guidelines, appropriate healthcare; predictors of medication use; quality improvement, quality management; quality indicators, measurement of quality; sustainability

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24815063     DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzu030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care        ISSN: 1353-4505            Impact factor:   2.038


  8 in total

1.  Improving the Utilization of Human Papillomavirus and Cervical Cytology Co-testing for Cervical Cancer Screening in an Obstetrics and Gynecology Resident Clinic.

Authors:  Kurt Yoshino; Maxine Karimoto; Christina Marzo; Bliss Kaneshiro; Mark Hiraoka
Journal:  Hawaii J Med Public Health       Date:  2015-08

2.  Influences of post-implementation factors on the sustainability, sustainment, and intra-organizational spread of complex interventions.

Authors:  Yuting Song; Lauren MacEachern; Malcolm B Doupe; Liane Ginsburg; Stephanie A Chamberlain; Lisa Cranley; Adam Easterbrook; Matthias Hoben; Jennifer Knopp-Sihota; R Colin Reid; Adrian Wagg; Carole A Estabrooks; Janice M Keefe; Tim Rappon; Whitney B Berta
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-05-17       Impact factor: 2.908

Review 3.  Automated/integrated real-time clinical decision support in acute kidney injury.

Authors:  Stuart L Goldstein
Journal:  Curr Opin Crit Care       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 3.687

4.  Interventions to Improve Follow-Up of Laboratory Test Results Pending at Discharge: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Nedra S Whitehead; Laurina Williams; Sreelatha Meleth; Sara Kennedy; Paul Epner; Hardeep Singh; Kathleene Wooldridge; Anuj K Dalal; Stacy E Walz; Tom Lorey; Mark L Graber
Journal:  J Hosp Med       Date:  2018-02-28       Impact factor: 2.899

Review 5.  How to study improvement interventions: a brief overview of possible study types.

Authors:  Margareth Crisóstomo Portela; Peter J Pronovost; Thomas Woodcock; Pam Carter; Mary Dixon-Woods
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2015-03-25       Impact factor: 7.035

Review 6.  How to study improvement interventions: a brief overview of possible study types.

Authors:  Margareth Crisóstomo Portela; Peter J Pronovost; Thomas Woodcock; Pam Carter; Mary Dixon-Woods
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 2.401

7.  Impacts of a navigation program based on health information technology for patients receiving oral anticancer therapy: the CAPRI randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Chloé Gervès-Pinquié; Fatima Daumas-Yatim; Benoît Lalloué; Anne Girault; Marie Ferrua; Aude Fourcade; François Lemare; Mario Dipalma; Etienne Minvielle
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 2.655

8.  Sustaining complex interventions in long-term care: a qualitative study of direct care staff and managers.

Authors:  Cathleen Colón-Emeric; Mark Toles; Michael P Cary; Melissa Batchelor-Murphy; Tracey Yap; Yuting Song; Rasheeda Hall; Amber Anderson; Andrew Burd; Ruth A Anderson
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2016-07-16       Impact factor: 7.327

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.