Literature DB >> 26277377

Degree of bioresorbable vascular scaffold expansion modulates loss of essential function.

Jahid Ferdous1, Vijaya B Kolachalama2, Kumaran Kolandaivelu3, Tarek Shazly4.   

Abstract

Drug-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVSs) have the potential to restore lumen patency, enable recovery of the native vascular environment, and circumvent late complications associated with permanent endovascular devices. To ensure therapeutic effects persist for sufficient times prior to scaffold resorption and resultant functional loss, many factors dictating BVS performance must be identified, characterized and optimized. While some factors relate to BVS design and manufacturing, others depend on device deployment and intrinsic vascular properties. Importantly, these factors interact and cannot be considered in isolation. The objective of this study is to quantify the extent to which degree of radial expansion modulates BVS performance, specifically in the context of modifying device erosion kinetics and evolution of structural mechanics and local drug elution. We systematically varied degree of radial expansion in model BVS constructs composed of poly dl-lactide-glycolide and generated in vitro metrics of device microstructure, degradation, erosion, mechanics and drug release. Experimental data permitted development of computational models that predicted transient concentrations of scaffold-derived soluble species and drug in the arterial wall, thus enabling speculation on the short- and long-term effects of differential expansion. We demonstrate that degree of expansion significantly affects scaffold properties critical to functionality, underscoring its relevance in BVS design and optimization. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: Bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) therapy is beginning to transform the treatment of obstructive artery disease, owing to effective treatment of short term vessel closure while avoiding long term consequences such as in situ, late stent thrombosis - a fatal event associated with permanent implants such as drug-eluting stents. As device scaffolding and drug elution are temporary for BVS, the notion of using this therapy in lieu of existing, clinically approved devices seems attractive. However, there is still a limited understanding regarding the optimal lifetime and performance characteristics of erodible endovascular implants. Several engineering criteria must be met and clinical endpoints confirmed to ensure these devices are both safe and effective. In this manuscript, we sought to establish general principles for the design and deployment of erodible, drug-eluting endovascular scaffolds, with focus on how differential expansion can modulate device performance.
Copyright © 2015 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds; Computational modeling; Drug delivery; Radial expansion

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26277377      PMCID: PMC4584207          DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2015.08.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Biomater        ISSN: 1742-7061            Impact factor:   8.947


  26 in total

1.  Bioresorbable polymeric vascular scaffolds: a cautionary tale.

Authors:  John A Ormiston; Frederic De Vroey; Patrick W Serruys; Mark W I Webster
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2011-10-01       Impact factor: 6.546

2.  From metallic cages to transient bioresorbable scaffolds: change in paradigm of coronary revascularization in the upcoming decade?

Authors:  Patrick W Serruys; Hector M Garcia-Garcia; Yoshinobu Onuma
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2011-10-31       Impact factor: 29.983

Review 3.  Design principles and performance of bioresorbable polymeric vascular scaffolds.

Authors:  James P Oberhauser; Syed Hossainy; Richard J Rapoza
Journal:  EuroIntervention       Date:  2009-12-15       Impact factor: 6.534

4.  A novel model and experimental analysis of hydrophilic and hydrophobic agent release from biodegradable polymers.

Authors:  Luciana Lisa Lao; Subbu S Venkatraman; Nicholas A Peppas
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2009-09-15       Impact factor: 4.396

5.  6-month clinical outcomes following implantation of the bioresorbable everolimus-eluting vascular scaffold in vessels smaller or larger than 2.5 mm.

Authors:  Roberto Diletti; Yoshinobu Onuma; Vasim Farooq; Josep Gomez-Lara; Salvatore Brugaletta; Robert Jan van Geuns; Evelyn Regar; Bernard de Bruyne; Dariusz Dudek; Leif Thuesen; Bernard Chevalier; Dougal McClean; Stephan Windecker; Robert Whitbourn; Pieter Smits; Jacques Koolen; Ian Meredith; Dong Li; Susan Veldhof; Richard Rapoza; Hector M Garcia-Garcia; John A Ormiston; Patrick W Serruys
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2011-07-12       Impact factor: 24.094

6.  Assessment of material by-product fate from bioresorbable vascular scaffolds.

Authors:  Tarek Shazly; Vijaya B Kolachalama; Jahid Ferdous; James P Oberhauser; Syed Hossainy; Elazer R Edelman
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2011-10-26       Impact factor: 3.934

7.  Mechanisms of tissue uptake and retention in zotarolimus-coated balloon therapy.

Authors:  Vijaya B Kolachalama; Stephen D Pacetti; Joseph W Franses; John J Stankus; Hugh Q Zhao; Tarek Shazly; Alexander Nikanorov; Lewis B Schwartz; Abraham R Tzafriri; Elazer R Edelman
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2013-04-12       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Diffusion-limited binding explains binary dose response for local arterial and tumour drug delivery.

Authors:  A R Tzafriri; A D Levin; E R Edelman
Journal:  Cell Prolif       Date:  2009-03-31       Impact factor: 6.831

Review 9.  Bioresorbable scaffolds: rationale, current status, challenges, and future.

Authors:  Javaid Iqbal; Yoshinobu Onuma; John Ormiston; Alexandre Abizaid; Ron Waksman; Patrick Serruys
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2013-12-23       Impact factor: 29.983

10.  Impact of polymer structure and composition on fully resorbable endovascular scaffold performance.

Authors:  Jahid Ferdous; Vijaya B Kolachalama; Tarek Shazly
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2012-12-20       Impact factor: 10.633

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds - basic concepts and clinical outcome.

Authors:  Ciro Indolfi; Salvatore De Rosa; Antonio Colombo
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2016-09-29       Impact factor: 32.419

2.  Visualizing polymeric bioresorbable scaffolds with three-dimensional image reconstruction using contrast-enhanced micro-computed tomography.

Authors:  Sheng Tu; Fudong Hu; Wei Cai; Liyan Xiao; Linlin Zhang; Hong Zheng; Qiong Jiang; Lianglong Chen
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2016-12-30       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 3.  Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds-Dead End or Still a Rough Diamond?

Authors:  Mateusz P Jeżewski; Michał J Kubisa; Ceren Eyileten; Salvatore De Rosa; Günter Christ; Maciej Lesiak; Ciro Indolfi; Aurel Toma; Jolanta M Siller-Matula; Marek Postuła
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2019-12-07       Impact factor: 4.241

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.