A R Tzafriri1, A D Levin, E R Edelman. 1. Harvard-MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA. ramitz@mit.edu
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Local drug delivery has transformed medicine, yet it remains unclear how drug efficacy depends on physicochemical properties and delivery kinetics. Most therapies seek to prolong release, yet recent studies demonstrate sustained clinical benefit following local bolus endovascular delivery. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of the current study was to examine interplay between drug dose, diffusion and binding in determining tissue penetration and effect. METHODS: We introduce a quantitative framework that balances dose, saturable binding and diffusion, and measured the specific binding parameters of drugs to target tissues. RESULTS: Model reduction techniques augmented by numerical simulations revealed that impact of saturable binding on drug transport and retention is determined by the magnitude of a binding potential, B(p), ratio of binding capacity to product of equilibrium dissociation constant and accessible tissue volume fraction. At low B(p) (< 1), drugs are predominantly free and transport scales linearly with concentration. At high B(p) (> 40), drug transport exhibits threshold dependence on applied surface concentration. CONCLUSIONS: In this paradigm, drugs and antibodies with large B(p) penetrate faster and deeper into tissues when presented at high concentrations. Threshold dependence of tissue transport on applied surface concentration of paclitaxel and rapamycin may explain threshold dose dependence of in vivo biological efficacy of these drugs.
BACKGROUND: Local drug delivery has transformed medicine, yet it remains unclear how drug efficacy depends on physicochemical properties and delivery kinetics. Most therapies seek to prolong release, yet recent studies demonstrate sustained clinical benefit following local bolus endovascular delivery. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of the current study was to examine interplay between drug dose, diffusion and binding in determining tissue penetration and effect. METHODS: We introduce a quantitative framework that balances dose, saturable binding and diffusion, and measured the specific binding parameters of drugs to target tissues. RESULTS: Model reduction techniques augmented by numerical simulations revealed that impact of saturable binding on drug transport and retention is determined by the magnitude of a binding potential, B(p), ratio of binding capacity to product of equilibrium dissociation constant and accessible tissue volume fraction. At low B(p) (< 1), drugs are predominantly free and transport scales linearly with concentration. At high B(p) (> 40), drug transport exhibits threshold dependence on applied surface concentration. CONCLUSIONS: In this paradigm, drugs and antibodies with large B(p) penetrate faster and deeper into tissues when presented at high concentrations. Threshold dependence of tissue transport on applied surface concentration of paclitaxel and rapamycin may explain threshold dose dependence of in vivo biological efficacy of these drugs.
Authors: Bruno Scheller; Christoph Hehrlein; Wolfgang Bocksch; Wolfgang Rutsch; Dariush Haghi; Ulrich Dietz; Michael Böhm; Ulrich Speck Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2006-11-13 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Gunnar Tepe; Thomas Zeller; Thomas Albrecht; Stephan Heller; Uwe Schwarzwälder; Jean-Paul Beregi; Claus D Claussen; Anja Oldenburg; Bruno Scheller; Ulrich Speck Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2008-02-14 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Arturo Garcia-Touchard; Sandra E Burke; John L Toner; Keith Cromack; Robert S Schwartz Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2006-01-31 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Patrick W Serruys; Georgios Sianos; Alexandre Abizaid; Jiro Aoki; Peter den Heijer; Hans Bonnier; Pieter Smits; Dougal McClean; Stefan Verheye; Jorge Belardi; Jose Condado; Michel Pieper; Louise Gambone; Marco Bressers; Janette Symons; Eduardo Sousa; Frank Litvack Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2005-07-19 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Natalie Artzi; Abraham R Tzafriri; Keith M Faucher; Geoffrey Moodie; Theresa Albergo; Suzanne Conroy; Scott Corbeil; Paul Martakos; Renu Virmani; Elazer R Edelman Journal: Ann Biomed Eng Date: 2015-08-28 Impact factor: 3.934
Authors: Wenda C Carlyle; James B McClain; Abraham R Tzafriri; Lynn Bailey; Brett G Zani; Peter M Markham; James R L Stanley; Elazer R Edelman Journal: J Control Release Date: 2012-07-16 Impact factor: 9.776
Authors: Abraham R Tzafriri; Fernando Garcia-Polite; Brett Zani; James Stanley; Benny Muraj; Jennifer Knutson; Robert Kohler; Peter Markham; Alexander Nikanorov; Elazer R Edelman Journal: J Control Release Date: 2017-09-01 Impact factor: 9.776
Authors: Vijaya B Kolachalama; Stephen D Pacetti; Joseph W Franses; John J Stankus; Hugh Q Zhao; Tarek Shazly; Alexander Nikanorov; Lewis B Schwartz; Abraham R Tzafriri; Elazer R Edelman Journal: Circulation Date: 2013-04-12 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Abraham R Tzafriri; Neda Vukmirovic; Vijaya B Kolachalama; Irina Astafieva; Elazer R Edelman Journal: J Control Release Date: 2009-11-17 Impact factor: 9.776
Authors: Mikhail Y Maslov; Elazer R Edelman; Abraham E Wei; Matthew J Pezone; Mark A Lovich Journal: J Control Release Date: 2013-07-18 Impact factor: 9.776