Literature DB >> 26276839

Current evidence of coronary artery bypass grafting off-pump versus on-pump: a systematic review with meta-analysis of over 16,900 patients investigated in randomized controlled trials†.

Antje-Christin Deppe1, Wasim Arbash2, Elmar W Kuhn2, Ingo Slottosch2, Maximilian Scherner2, Oliver J Liakopoulos2, Yeong-Hoon Choi3, Thorsten Wahlers2.   

Abstract

In the present systematic review with meta-analysis, we sought to determine the current strength of evidence for or against off-pump and on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) with regard to hard clinical end-points, graft patency and cost-effectiveness. We performed a meta-analysis of only randomized controlled trials (RCT) which reported at least one of the desired end-points including: (i) major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), (ii) all-cause mortality, (iii) myocardial infarction, (iv) cerebrovascular accident, (v) repeat revascularization, (vi) graft patency and (vii) cost-effectiveness. The pooled treatment effects [odds ratio (OR) or weighted mean difference, 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs)] were assessed using a fixed or random effects model. A total of 16 904 patients from 51 studies were identified after literature search of the major databases using a predefined keyword list. The incidence of MACCE did not differ between the groups, neither during the first 30 days (OR: 0.93; 95% CI: 0.82-1.04) nor for the longest available follow-up (OR: 1.01; 95% CI: 0.92-1.12). While the incidence of mid-term graft failure (OR: 1.37; 95% CI: 1.09-1.72) and the need for repeat revascularization (OR: 1.55; 95% CI: 1.33-1.80) was increased after off-pump surgery, on-pump surgery was associated with an increased occurrence of stroke (OR: 0.74; 95% CI: 0.58-0.95), renal impairment (OR: 0.79; 95% CI: 0.71-0.89) and mediastinitis (OR: 0.44; 95% CI: 0.31-0.62). There was no difference with regard to hard clinical end-points between on- or off-pump surgery, including myocardial infarction or mortality. The present systematic review emphasizes that both off- and on-pump surgery provide excellent and comparable results in patients requiring surgical revascularization. The choice for either strategy should take into account the individual patient profile (comorbidities, life expectancy, etc.) and importantly, the surgeon's experience in performing on- or off-pump CABG in their routine practice.
© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CABG; Meta-analysis; OPCAB; Off-pump myocardial revascularization; On-pump myocardial revascularization

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26276839     DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezv268

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg        ISSN: 1010-7940            Impact factor:   4.191


  24 in total

1.  On vs. off pump coronary artery bypass grafting: the next chapter.

Authors:  Nicola King
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2017-03

2.  Coronary artery bypass grafting off-pump or on-pump: another brick in the wall.

Authors:  Antonio M Calafiore; Sotirios Prapas; Ahmed Osman; Michele Di Mauro
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2017-04

3.  Endotracheal bioimpedance cardiography improves immediate postoperative outcome: a case-control study in off-pump coronary surgery.

Authors:  Thomas Leclercq; Marc Lilot; Thomas Schulz; Alexandre Meyer; Fadi Farhat; Jean-Luc Fellahi
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2017-02-08       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 4.  [Cardioprotection in cardiac surgical patients : Everything good comes from the heart].

Authors:  C Stoppe; P Meybohm; M Coburn; A Goetzenich
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 5.  Impact of off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting on survival: current best available evidence.

Authors:  Pierpaolo Chivasso; Gustavo A Guida; Daniel Fudulu; Vito D Bruno; Roberto Marsico; Hristo Sedmakov; Mustafa Zakkar; Filippo Rapetto; Alan J Bryan; Gianni D Angelini
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 2.895

6.  Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: where are we now?

Authors:  Shahzad G Raja; Umberto Benedetto; David P Taggart
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 2.895

7.  Is there a long-term survival benefit with on pump coronary artery bypass grafting?

Authors:  Nicola King
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2017-12

8.  Incidence of perioperative stroke in clampless aortic anastomosis during off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting.

Authors:  Francesco Formica; Giuseppe Tata; Gurmeet Singh; Serena Mariani; Stefano D'Alessandro; Luigi Amerigo Messina; Fabio Sangalli; Giovanni Paolini
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 9.  Current outcomes of off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: evidence from randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Daniel Fudulu; Umberto Benedetto; Gustavo Guida Pecchinenda; Pierpaolo Chivasso; Vito Domenico Bruno; Filippo Rapetto; Alan Bryan; Gianni Davide Angelini
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 2.895

10.  Impact of diabetes mellitus on coagulation function before and after off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting.

Authors:  Dawei Wang; Yu Liu; Ziying Chen; Fei Yang; Zhenming Zhang; Yulei Wei
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 2.895

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.