Maarten P T de Wit1, Tineke A Abma, Marije S Koelewijn-van Loon, Sarah Collins, John Kirwan. 1. From the Department of Medical Humanities, VU Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; CAPHRI School for Public Health and Primary Care, Department of General Practice, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands; School of Clinical Sciences, University of Bristol, and Academic Rheumatology Unit, Bristol Royal Infirmary, Bristol, UK.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Since 2002, 58 patients have participated as collaborating partners in 6 Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) conferences. Little is known about how they engage with researchers and how they have influenced conference outcomes. METHODS: A responsive evaluation was carried out, including a thematic document analysis of conference proceedings and gray literature, participant observation, and 38 interviews with patients and professionals representing research, industry, and regulators. Interview transcripts were subjected to an inductive content analysis. RESULTS: The role of patients has evolved from a single focus group in 2002 to full integration in all parts of the conference in 2012. Longterm engagement has made a significant change in the scope and conduct of rheumatology research. It has enriched the research agenda by identifying previously neglected outcome domains such as fatigue, sleep disturbances, and flares, and it has contributed to more patient-relevant outcomes in clinical trials. Facilitating factors have been a strong commitment of the leadership, adequate selection procedure, inclusive conference design, interactive and encouraging moderation style, and self-organized support. The intensity of the program and doubts regarding the representativeness of the patient group were still seen as challenges for the future. CONCLUSION: Making patient participation an integral part of the vision and procedures of OMERACT has significantly contributed to the success of OMERACT. It has changed the perceptions and beliefs of many participants. Full use of patients' experiential knowledge before and during the conference is still challenging.
OBJECTIVE: Since 2002, 58 patients have participated as collaborating partners in 6 Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) conferences. Little is known about how they engage with researchers and how they have influenced conference outcomes. METHODS: A responsive evaluation was carried out, including a thematic document analysis of conference proceedings and gray literature, participant observation, and 38 interviews with patients and professionals representing research, industry, and regulators. Interview transcripts were subjected to an inductive content analysis. RESULTS: The role of patients has evolved from a single focus group in 2002 to full integration in all parts of the conference in 2012. Longterm engagement has made a significant change in the scope and conduct of rheumatology research. It has enriched the research agenda by identifying previously neglected outcome domains such as fatigue, sleep disturbances, and flares, and it has contributed to more patient-relevant outcomes in clinical trials. Facilitating factors have been a strong commitment of the leadership, adequate selection procedure, inclusive conference design, interactive and encouraging moderation style, and self-organized support. The intensity of the program and doubts regarding the representativeness of the patient group were still seen as challenges for the future. CONCLUSION: Making patient participation an integral part of the vision and procedures of OMERACT has significantly contributed to the success of OMERACT. It has changed the perceptions and beliefs of many participants. Full use of patients' experiential knowledge before and during the conference is still challenging.
Entities:
Keywords:
OMERACT; OUTCOME RESEARCH; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PATIENT RESEARCH PARTNER; RHEUMATOLOGY RESEARCH; USER INVOLVEMENT
Authors: Jennifer Petkovic; Jennifer L Barton; Caroline Flurey; Niti Goel; Christie M Bartels; Cheryl Barnabe; Maarten P T de Wit; Anne Lyddiatt; Diane Lacaille; Vivian Welch; Annelies Boonen; Beverley Shea; Robin Christensen; Lara J Maxwell; Willemina Campbell; Janet Jull; Karine Toupin-April; Jasvinder A Singh; Charles H Goldsmith; Antoine G Sreih; Christoph Pohl; Catherine Hofstetter; Dorcas E Beaton; Rachelle Buchbinder; Francis Guillemin; Peter S Tugwell Journal: J Rheumatol Date: 2017-02-15 Impact factor: 4.666
Authors: Derek Kyte; Bryce B Reeve; Fabio Efficace; Kirstie Haywood; Rebecca Mercieca-Bebber; Madeleine T King; Josephine M Norquist; William R Lenderking; Claire Snyder; Lena Ring; Galina Velikova; Melanie Calvert Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2015-08-15 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Audun Utengen; Dara Rouholiman; Jamison G Gamble; Francisco Jose Grajales; Nisha Pradhan; Alicia C Staley; Liza Bernstein; Sean D Young; Kevin A Clauson; Larry F Chu Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2017-08-17 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Maarten de Wit; John R Kirwan; Peter Tugwell; Dorcas Beaton; Maarten Boers; Peter Brooks; Sarah Collins; Philip G Conaghan; Maria-Antonietta D'Agostino; Cathie Hofstetter; Rod Hughes; Amye Leong; Ann Lyddiatt; Lyn March; James May; Pamela Montie; Pamela Richards; Lee S Simon; Jasvinder A Singh; Vibeke Strand; Marieke Voshaar; Clifton O Bingham; Laure Gossec Journal: Patient Date: 2017-04 Impact factor: 3.883