Literature DB >> 24128777

What has been the effect on trial outcome assessments of a decade of patient participation in OMERACT?

Maarten P T de Wit1, Tineke A Abma, Marije S Koelewijn-van Loon, Sarah Collins, John Kirwan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Since 2002, 58 patients have participated as collaborating partners in 6 Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) conferences. Little is known about how they engage with researchers and how they have influenced conference outcomes.
METHODS: A responsive evaluation was carried out, including a thematic document analysis of conference proceedings and gray literature, participant observation, and 38 interviews with patients and professionals representing research, industry, and regulators. Interview transcripts were subjected to an inductive content analysis.
RESULTS: The role of patients has evolved from a single focus group in 2002 to full integration in all parts of the conference in 2012. Longterm engagement has made a significant change in the scope and conduct of rheumatology research. It has enriched the research agenda by identifying previously neglected outcome domains such as fatigue, sleep disturbances, and flares, and it has contributed to more patient-relevant outcomes in clinical trials. Facilitating factors have been a strong commitment of the leadership, adequate selection procedure, inclusive conference design, interactive and encouraging moderation style, and self-organized support. The intensity of the program and doubts regarding the representativeness of the patient group were still seen as challenges for the future.
CONCLUSION: Making patient participation an integral part of the vision and procedures of OMERACT has significantly contributed to the success of OMERACT. It has changed the perceptions and beliefs of many participants. Full use of patients' experiential knowledge before and during the conference is still challenging.

Entities:  

Keywords:  OMERACT; OUTCOME RESEARCH; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PATIENT RESEARCH PARTNER; RHEUMATOLOGY RESEARCH; USER INVOLVEMENT

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24128777     DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.130816

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Rheumatol        ISSN: 0315-162X            Impact factor:   4.666


  12 in total

Review 1.  Framework for Advancing the Reporting of Patient Engagement in Rheumatology Research Projects.

Authors:  Clayon B Hamilton; Jenny C Leese; Alison M Hoens; Linda C Li
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 4.592

2.  Health Equity Considerations for Developing and Reporting Patient-reported Outcomes in Clinical Trials: A Report from the OMERACT Equity Special Interest Group.

Authors:  Jennifer Petkovic; Jennifer L Barton; Caroline Flurey; Niti Goel; Christie M Bartels; Cheryl Barnabe; Maarten P T de Wit; Anne Lyddiatt; Diane Lacaille; Vivian Welch; Annelies Boonen; Beverley Shea; Robin Christensen; Lara J Maxwell; Willemina Campbell; Janet Jull; Karine Toupin-April; Jasvinder A Singh; Charles H Goldsmith; Antoine G Sreih; Christoph Pohl; Catherine Hofstetter; Dorcas E Beaton; Rachelle Buchbinder; Francis Guillemin; Peter S Tugwell
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 4.666

3.  International Society for Quality of Life Research commentary on the draft European Medicines Agency reflection paper on the use of patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures in oncology studies.

Authors:  Derek Kyte; Bryce B Reeve; Fabio Efficace; Kirstie Haywood; Rebecca Mercieca-Bebber; Madeleine T King; Josephine M Norquist; William R Lenderking; Claire Snyder; Lena Ring; Galina Velikova; Melanie Calvert
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2015-08-15       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  Increasing User Involvement in Health Care and Health Research Simultaneously: A Proto-Protocol for "Person-as-Researcher" and Online Decision Support Tools.

Authors:  Mette Kjer Kaltoft; Jesper Bo Nielsen; Glenn Salkeld; Jack Dowie
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2014-11-25

5.  Patient Participation at Health Care Conferences: Engaged Patients Increase Information Flow, Expand Propagation, and Deepen Engagement in the Conversation of Tweets Compared to Physicians or Researchers.

Authors:  Audun Utengen; Dara Rouholiman; Jamison G Gamble; Francisco Jose Grajales; Nisha Pradhan; Alicia C Staley; Liza Bernstein; Sean D Young; Kevin A Clauson; Larry F Chu
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2017-08-17       Impact factor: 5.428

6.  'Is it worth doing?' Measuring the impact of patient and public involvement in research.

Authors:  Kristina Staley
Journal:  Res Involv Engagem       Date:  2015-07-31

7.  Successful Stepwise Development of Patient Research Partnership: 14 Years' Experience of Actions and Consequences in Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT).

Authors:  Maarten de Wit; John R Kirwan; Peter Tugwell; Dorcas Beaton; Maarten Boers; Peter Brooks; Sarah Collins; Philip G Conaghan; Maria-Antonietta D'Agostino; Cathie Hofstetter; Rod Hughes; Amye Leong; Ann Lyddiatt; Lyn March; James May; Pamela Montie; Pamela Richards; Lee S Simon; Jasvinder A Singh; Vibeke Strand; Marieke Voshaar; Clifton O Bingham; Laure Gossec
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 3.883

8.  It's not evidence, it's insight: bringing patients' perspectives into health technology appraisal at NICE.

Authors:  Kristina Staley; Caroline Doherty
Journal:  Res Involv Engagem       Date:  2016-03-24

9.  The impact of involvement on researchers: a learning experience.

Authors:  Kristina Staley; Isabelle Abbey-Vital; Claire Nolan
Journal:  Res Involv Engagem       Date:  2017-09-18

10.  Understanding and using patient experiences as evidence in healthcare priority setting.

Authors:  Leah Rand; Michael Dunn; Ingrid Slade; Sheela Upadhyaya; Mark Sheehan
Journal:  Cost Eff Resour Alloc       Date:  2019-09-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.