Literature DB >> 26275646

Risk in homeopathy: Classification of adverse events and homeopathic aggravations--A cross sectional study among Norwegian homeopath patients.

Trine Stub1, Agnete E Kristoffersen2, Terje Alræk2, Frauke Musial2, Aslak Steinsbekk3.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: The registration of adverse events is important to identify treatment that might impose risk to patients. Homeopathic aggravation, a concept unique for homeopathy may impose a particular risk, as it is tolerant towards a worsening of the patients' symptoms. The aim of this study was to explore the classification of patient reported reactions as homeopathic aggravations or adverse drug reactions. DESIGN AND
SETTING: In a cross sectional survey, patients were asked to register any reactions they had experienced 14 days after taking homeopathic remedies. Worsening of symptoms was classified as homeopathic aggravation if it was (i) an increase of the patients' existing symptoms (ii) and/or a feeling of well-being that emerged 1-3 days after taking the remedy (iii) and/or headache and/or fatigue accompanying these symptoms.
RESULTS: A total of 26% of the participants reported worsening of symptoms. One third was classified as adverse events. Half of these were graded as minor and the other half as moderate according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. Two thirds were classified as homeopathic aggravations. Of these, 73% were classified as minor and 27% as moderate, giving a tendency towards milder severity for those classified as homeopathic aggravations (p=0.065).
CONCLUSION: Patients reported a substantial part of the short-term reactions after taking homeopathic remedy as a worsening of symptoms. These reactions were classified as mild and moderate. Hence, the risk connected to homeopathic treatment is minor. More studies are needed to confirm the existence of homeopathic aggravation and how to classify the concept in a clinically meaningful way.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adverse events; Cross sectional survey; Healing crisis; Homeopathic aggravations; Homeopathy; Risk assessment; Safety

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26275646     DOI: 10.1016/j.ctim.2015.06.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Complement Ther Med        ISSN: 0965-2299            Impact factor:   2.446


  5 in total

1.  The usage of over-the-counter products by private insured patients in Germany - a claims data analysis with focus on complementary medicine.

Authors:  Katja Goetz; Matthias Kalder; Ute-Susann Albert; Christian O Jacke
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-07-13       Impact factor: 2.655

2.  Paradigm-Specific Risk Conceptions, Patient Safety, and the Regulation of Traditional and Complementary Medicine Practitioners: The Case of Homeopathy in Ontario, Canada.

Authors:  Nadine Ijaz
Journal:  Front Sociol       Date:  2020-01-21

3.  Safety and use of complementary and alternative medicine in Norway during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic using an adapted version of the I-CAM-Q; a cross-sectional survey.

Authors:  Agnete Egilsdatter Kristoffersen; Miek C Jong; Johanna Hök Nordberg; Esther T van der Werf; Trine Stub
Journal:  BMC Complement Med Ther       Date:  2022-09-03

4.  Use of complementary and alternative medicine in patients with health complaints attributed to former dental amalgam fillings.

Authors:  Agnete E Kristoffersen; Frauke Musial; Harald J Hamre; Lars Björkman; Trine Stub; Anita Salamonsen; Terje Alræk
Journal:  BMC Complement Altern Med       Date:  2016-01-22       Impact factor: 3.659

5.  Emotional release and physical symptom improvement: a qualitative analysis of self-reported outcomes and mechanisms in patients treated with neural therapy.

Authors:  Heidemarie Haller; Felix J Saha; Barbara Ebner; Anna Kowoll; Dennis Anheyer; Gustav Dobos; Bettina Berger; Kyung-Eun Choi
Journal:  BMC Complement Altern Med       Date:  2018-11-27       Impact factor: 3.659

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.