| Literature DB >> 26273610 |
Cheng Han1, Chenyan Li1, Jinyuan Mao1, Weiwei Wang1, Xiaochen Xie1, Weiwei Zhou2, Chenyang Li2, Bin Xu3, Lihua Bi4, Tao Meng5, Jianling Du6, Shaowei Zhang7, Zhengnan Gao8, Xiaomei Zhang9, Liu Yang10, Chenling Fan1, Weiping Teng1, Zhongyan Shan1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Maternal thyroid dysfunction in early pregnancy may increase the risk of adverse pregnancy complications and neurocognitive deficiencies in the developing fetus. Currently, some researchers demonstrated that body mass index (BMI) is associated with thyroid function in nonpregnant population. Hence, the American Thyroid Association recommended screening thyroid function in obese pregnant women; however, the evidence for this is weak. For this purpose, our study investigated the relationship between high BMI and thyroid functions during early pregnancy in Liaoning province, an iodine-sufficient region of China.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26273610 PMCID: PMC4530209 DOI: 10.1155/2015/351831
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Figure 1Flowchart of the study population.
Serum levels of TSH and FT4 in pregnant womena.
| BMI (Kg/m2) | TSH mIU/L | FT4 pmol/L | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Median | 2.5th–97.5th |
| Median | 2.5th–97.5th |
| |
| <18.5 | 1.85 | 0.17–5.50 | 16.52 | 12.95–22.18 | ||
| 18.5–24.9 | 1.86 | 0.27–6.10 | 0.642 | 16.10 | 12.25–21.10 | <0.001b |
| 25.0–29.9 | 2.11 | 0.37–6.78 | <0.001b | 15.34 | 11.90–19.68 | <0.001b |
| ≥30.0 | 2.50 | 0.56–13.82 | 0.004b | 14.67 | 10.25–18.77 | <0.001b |
TSH: thyroid stimulating hormone; FT4: free thyroxine.
aThe P value represent the median level of this group compared with the upper group.
b P < 0.008 was considered as a significant difference.
Figure 2Distribution of FT4 in different group in pregnant women. In comparison to normal and underweight groups, obese and overweight groups resulted with left-shifted FT4 distribution curves; hence, the FT4 level was lower in groups with higher BMI.
Prevalence of thyroid dysfunctionsb,c.
| BMI (Kg/m2) | Total | Overt | Subclinical hypothyroidism | Isolated | TPOAb positive | TgAb positive |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total | 6303 | 63 (1.0) | 203 (3.2) | 149 (2.4) | 578 (9.2) | 790 (12.5) |
| <18.5 | 870 | 2 (0.2) | 29 (3.3) | 11 (1.3) | 58 (6.7) | 94 (10.8) |
| 18.5–24.9 | 4547 | 42 (0.9) | 141 (3.1) | 87 (1.9) | 402 (8.8) | 564 (12.4) |
| 25.0–29.9 | 796 | 16 (2.0) | 26 (3.3) | 40 (5.0) | 97 (12.2) | 114 (14.3) |
| ≥30.0 | 90 | 3 (3.3) | 7 (7.8) | 11 (12.2) | 21 (23.3) | 18 (20.0) |
|
| <0.001 | 0.101 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.025 | |
|
| <0.001 | 0.340 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.004 |
a P value for trend.
b P < 0.05 was considered as a significant difference.
cThe diagnostic standards for thyroid abnormalities were according to the pregnant specific reference ranges of the 4th–8th gestational weeks.
Multivariate logistic regressiona.
| BMI (kg/m2) | Adjusted OR (95% CI) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TSH > 5.22 mIU/Lb | FT4 < 12.27 pmol/Lb | TPOAb > 34 IU/mLc | TgAb > 115 IU/mLd | |
| <18.5 | 0.90 (0.59–1.35) | 0.56 (0.31–1.00) | 0.80 (0.59–1.09) | 0.88 (0.68–1.13) |
| 18.5–24.9 | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref |
| 25.0–29.9 | 1.33 (0.93–1.91) | 2.43 (1.74–3.40) | 1.53 (1.19–1.96) | 1.02 (0.80–1.30) |
| ≥30.0 | 2.41 (1.16–4.99) | 5.34 (2.85–10.02) | 3.18 (1.86–5.44) | 0.89 (0.45–1.76) |
Ref: reference category.
aMultivariate logistic regression was carried out in a stepwise manner. P < 0.05 was considered as a significant difference.
bAdjusted for age, gestational weeks, TPOAb, TgAb, and UIC (stepwise manner).
cAdjusted for age, gestational weeks, UIC, and TgAb (stepwise manner).
dAdjusted for age, gestational weeks, UIC, and TPOAb (enter manner).
Figure 3Prevalence of isolated hypothyroxinemia with the increase in BMI. The figure clearly indicates that the prevalence of isolated hypothyroxinemia during the 4th–8th gestational weeks shows a rise when BMI > 24 kg/m2.