| Literature DB >> 26273336 |
Keke Yu1, Jie Zhang2, Xin Li3, Lei Xu3, Ye Zhang1, Jie Xing1, Jinchen Shao2, Lei Zhu2, Jinguo Liu2, Lanxiang Zhao2, Baohui Han4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The prevalence of lung cancer, a highly complex neoplasm, increases annually. Thus, a lung cancer biobank, which stores lung cancer tissue and blood matched according to standard methods, is needed to advance lung cancer research and develop promising therapies.Entities:
Keywords: Biobank; information; lung cancer; standardization
Year: 2015 PMID: 26273336 PMCID: PMC4448472 DOI: 10.1111/1759-7714.12144
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Thorac Cancer ISSN: 1759-7706 Impact factor: 3.500
Figure 1Specimen constituents. (a) Constituent ratio of gender was 61:39 (male vs. female patients); (b) Lung adenocarcinoma and lung squamous cell carcinoma accounted for the majority of the total surgical specimens: adenocarcinoma specimens represented 62.72% and squamous cell carcinomas comprised 20.66% of the samples. Small cell lung cancer patients may not be eligible for surgery because of early transfer and is often treated by radiotherapy and chemotherapy. (a) , male 61.08%; , female 38.92% (b) , adenocarcinoma 62.72%; , squamous cell carcinoma 20.66%; , small cell carcinoma 6.96%; , large cell carcinoma 0.97%; , other types 8.69%.
Figure 2Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining. (a) Frozen adenocarcinoma samples stained with H&E; (b) Formalin fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) sample from the same donor stained with H&E. (c) Frozen squamous cell carcinoma sample stained with H&E; (d) FFPE sample from the same donor stained with H&E. (×200).
OD values and concentration of biological specimen DNA and RNA from different storage methods
| DNA | OD260/280 | Ng/ul | RNA | OD260/280 | Ng/ul |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.93 | 106.48 | 1 | 1.91 | 132.65 |
| 2 | 1.95 | 144.33 | 2 | 1.95 | 131.9 |
| 3 | 1.87 | 81.56 | 3 | 1.98 | 199.43 |
| 4 | 1.89 | 98.92 | 4 | 1.97 | 187.43 |
| 5 | 1.97 | 147.56 | 5 | 1.95 | 140.15 |
| 6 | 1.81 | 90.97 | 6 | 1.98 | 178.45 |
| 7 | 1.93 | 98.08 | 7 | 1.91 | 150.71 |
| 8 | 1.8 | 81.56 | 8 | 1.92 | 133.73 |
| 9 | 1.87 | 58.34 | 9 | 1.89 | 111.63 |
| 10 | 1.83 | 86.56 | 10 | 1.93 | 128.47 |
| 11 | 1.89 | 82.15 | 11 | 1.82 | 79.43 |
| 12 | 1.81 | 75.27 | 12 | 1.83 | 85.71 |
| 13 | 1.91 | 80.99 | 13 | 1.84 | 88.64 |
| 14 | 1.81 | 74.82 | 14 | 1.81 | 74.01 |
| 15 | 1.86 | 76.49 | 15 | 1.82 | 80.48 |
OD, optical density; RNA, ribonucleic acid.
Figure 3DNA quality. (a) 1% agarose gel electrophoresis for genomic DNA;1–5 were extracted from frozen tissue samples, 6–10 were from the same donor's FFPE tissue samples. (b) 11–15 were extracted from the same donor's frozen blood samples.
Figure 4Ribonucleic acid (RNA) quality. (a) 1% agarose gel electrophoresisfor total RNA; 1–5 were extracted from frozen tissue samples, 6–10 were from the same donor's FFPE tissue samples. (b) 11–15 were extracted from the same donor's frozen blood samples. (c) TheRNA Integrity Number (RIN) evaluated with a NanoDrop 1000 ultraviolet spectrophotometer was greater than seven. See Figure 3 for the order of tested samples.
Figure 5Protein quality. From frozen samples, 1–5 protein was extracted and tested via Westernblot.