Literature DB >> 2627294

A comparison of the CHARMM, AMBER and ECEPP potentials for peptides. II. Phi-psi maps for N-acetyl alanine N'-methyl amide: comparisons, contrasts and simple experimental tests.

I K Roterman1, M H Lambert, K D Gibson, H A Scheraga.   

Abstract

phi-psi maps of N-acetyl alanine N'-methyl amide have been computed using the CHARMM potential, the all-atom AMBER potential, and the ECEPP/2 potential, before and after adiabatic relaxation. Maps using the CHARMM and AMBER potentials were determined with values of 1.0 and 4.0 for the dielectric constant epsilon, and with a distance dependent dielectric constant. Adiabatic relaxation was carried out using flexible geometry for the CHARMM and AMBER potentials, and using rigid geometry for the AMBER and ECEPP potentials. In all cases, the lowest energy was found in the C7eq region (phi approximately -70 degrees, psi approximately 70 degrees). The maps with CHARMM and AMBER with epsilon = 4.0 and with ECEPP, without adiabatic relaxation, were broadly similar but differed in the relative energies allotted to high-energy regions of the map. After adiabatic relaxation with rigid geometry, the map with ECEPP, and the map with AMBER using a distance-dependent dielectric constant, agreed fairly well apart from differences in the relative energies of the alpha R, alpha L, and C7ax regions. After adiabatic relaxation with flexible geometry, the maps with CHARMM and AMBER became very similar; the lowest energies were observed in the C7eq region, the C5 region (phi approximately -150 degrees, psi approximately 150 degrees) and the C7ax region (phi approximately 70 degrees, psi approximately -70 degrees). Breakdown of the energies, after adiabatic relaxation, into electrostatic, nonbonded, and geometric (including torsional) contributions, showed that (1) with fixed geometry, the nonbonded and torsional contribution to the ECEPP and AMBER potentials were very similar, but the electrostatic contributions were markedly different; (2) with flexible geometry, the nonbonded contribution to the CHARMM and AMBER potentials did not vary greatly over the whole map. The phi-psi maps were subjected to three simple comparisons with experiment. (1) The maps were used to predict the characteristic ratio for poly-L-alanine, and the results were compared with experimental findings (D.A. Brant and P.J. Flory, J. Amer. Chem. Soc. 87, 2788-2791, 1965). The agreement with experiment was acceptable for ECEPP, and for CHARMM after adiabatic relaxation, marginal for AMBER after adiabatic relaxation, and unsatisfactory for CHARMM or AMBER without adiabatic relaxation. (2) Deviations of bond angles from their equilibrium values, in energy-minimized conformations, were compared with values deduced from crystals of terminally-blocked amino acids. With both the CHARMM and AMBER potentials using flexible geometry, one or more excessive deviations was observed in the C7ax local minimum.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2627294     DOI: 10.1080/07391102.1989.10508503

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomol Struct Dyn        ISSN: 0739-1102


  16 in total

1.  A simple model for polyproline II structure in unfolded states of alanine-based peptides.

Authors:  Rohit V Pappu; George D Rose
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 6.725

2.  Computational simulations of the conformational behaviour of the adhesive proteins RGDS fragment.

Authors:  M Cotrait; M Kreissler; J Hoflack; J M Lehn; B Maigret
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 3.686

3.  Investigation of a physical basis for conformational similarity in proteins.

Authors:  L Glasser; H A Scheraga
Journal:  J Protein Chem       Date:  1991-06

4.  An energy-based approach to packing the 7-helix bundle of bacteriorhodopsin.

Authors:  K C Chou; L Carlacci; G M Maggiora; L A Parodi; M W Schulz
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 6.725

5.  Libraries of atomic multipole moments for precise modeling of electrostatic properties of amino acids.

Authors:  W Sokalski
Journal:  Amino Acids       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 3.520

6.  Modelling of peptide and protein structures.

Authors:  S Fraga; J M Parker
Journal:  Amino Acids       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 3.520

7.  Generalized pattern search algorithm for Peptide structure prediction.

Authors:  Giuseppe Nicosia; Giovanni Stracquadanio
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2008-05-16       Impact factor: 4.033

8.  Experimentally observed conformation-dependent geometry and hidden strain in proteins.

Authors:  P A Karplus
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 6.725

Review 9.  Semiempirical Quantum Mechanical Methods for Noncovalent Interactions for Chemical and Biochemical Applications.

Authors:  Anders S Christensen; Tomáš Kubař; Qiang Cui; Marcus Elstner
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2016-04-13       Impact factor: 60.622

Review 10.  My 65 years in protein chemistry.

Authors:  Harold A Scheraga
Journal:  Q Rev Biophys       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 5.318

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.