Literature DB >> 26272600

Detection of proneural/mesenchymal marker expression in glioblastoma: temporospatial dynamics and association with chromatin-modifying gene expression.

Hideki Murata1, Koji Yoshimoto2, Ryusuke Hatae1, Yojiro Akagi1, Masahiro Mizoguchi1, Nobuhiro Hata3, Daisuke Kuga1, Akira Nakamizo4, Toshiyuki Amano1, Tetsuro Sayama1, Koji Iihara1.   

Abstract

Proneural and mesenchymal are two subtypes of glioblastoma identified by gene expression profiling. In this study, the primary aim was to detect markers to develop a clinically applicable method for distinguishing proneural and mesenchymal glioblastoma. The secondary aims were to investigate the temporospatial dynamics of these markers and to explore the association between these markers and the expression of chromatin-modifying genes. One hundred thirty-three glioma samples (grade II: 14 samples, grade III: 18, grade IV: 101) were analyzed. We quantified the expression of 6 signature genes associated with proneural and mesenchymal glioblastoma by quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction. We assigned proneural (PN) and mesenchymal (MES) scores based on the average of the 6 markers and calculated a predominant metagene (P-M) score by subtracting the MES from the PN score. We used these scores to analyze correlations with malignant transformation, tumor recurrence, tumor heterogeneity, chromatin-modifying gene expression, and HDAC7 expression. The MES score positively correlated with tumor grade, whereas the PN score did not. The P-M score was able to distinguish the proneural and mesenchymal subtypes. It was decreased in cases of tumor recurrence and malignant transformation and showed variability within a tumor, suggesting intratumoral heterogeneity. The PN score correlated with the expression of multiple histone-modifying genes, whereas the MES score was associated only with HDAC7 expression. Thus, we demonstrated a simple and straightforward method of quantifying proneural/mesenchymal markers in glioblastoma. Of note, HDAC7 expression might be a novel therapeutic target in glioblastoma treatment.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Glioblastoma; HDAC7; Mesenchymal; P-M score; Proneural

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26272600     DOI: 10.1007/s11060-015-1886-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurooncol        ISSN: 0167-594X            Impact factor:   4.130


  32 in total

Review 1.  Histone lysine methylation and demethylation pathways in cancer.

Authors:  Radhika A Varier; H T Marc Timmers
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2010-10-15

Review 2.  Epigenetic modifications and human disease.

Authors:  Anna Portela; Manel Esteller
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 54.908

Review 3.  Histone deacetylases and cancer.

Authors:  Bruna Barneda-Zahonero; Maribel Parra
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2012-08-27       Impact factor: 6.603

4.  Single-cell RNA-seq highlights intratumoral heterogeneity in primary glioblastoma.

Authors:  Anoop P Patel; Itay Tirosh; John J Trombetta; Alex K Shalek; Shawn M Gillespie; Hiroaki Wakimoto; Daniel P Cahill; Brian V Nahed; William T Curry; Robert L Martuza; David N Louis; Orit Rozenblatt-Rosen; Mario L Suvà; Aviv Regev; Bradley E Bernstein
Journal:  Science       Date:  2014-06-12       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Histone deacetylase 7 promotes Toll-like receptor 4-dependent proinflammatory gene expression in macrophages.

Authors:  Melanie R Shakespear; Daniel M Hohenhaus; Greg M Kelly; Nabilah A Kamal; Praveer Gupta; Larisa I Labzin; Kate Schroder; Valerie Garceau; Sheila Barbero; Abishek Iyer; David A Hume; Robert C Reid; Katharine M Irvine; David P Fairlie; Matthew J Sweet
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2013-07-12       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  Associations between microRNA expression and mesenchymal marker gene expression in glioblastoma.

Authors:  Xinlong Ma; Koji Yoshimoto; Yaulei Guan; Nobuhiro Hata; Masahiro Mizoguchi; Noriaki Sagata; Hideki Murata; Daisuke Kuga; Toshiyuki Amano; Akira Nakamizo; Tomio Sasaki
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2012-07-27       Impact factor: 12.300

7.  Molecular subclasses of high-grade glioma predict prognosis, delineate a pattern of disease progression, and resemble stages in neurogenesis.

Authors:  Heidi S Phillips; Samir Kharbanda; Ruihuan Chen; William F Forrest; Robert H Soriano; Thomas D Wu; Anjan Misra; Janice M Nigro; Howard Colman; Liliana Soroceanu; P Mickey Williams; Zora Modrusan; Burt G Feuerstein; Ken Aldape
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 31.743

8.  Hotspot mutations in H3F3A and IDH1 define distinct epigenetic and biological subgroups of glioblastoma.

Authors:  Dominik Sturm; Hendrik Witt; Volker Hovestadt; Dong-Anh Khuong-Quang; David T W Jones; Carolin Konermann; Elke Pfaff; Martje Tönjes; Martin Sill; Sebastian Bender; Marcel Kool; Marc Zapatka; Natalia Becker; Manuela Zucknick; Thomas Hielscher; Xiao-Yang Liu; Adam M Fontebasso; Marina Ryzhova; Steffen Albrecht; Karine Jacob; Marietta Wolter; Martin Ebinger; Martin U Schuhmann; Timothy van Meter; Michael C Frühwald; Holger Hauch; Arnulf Pekrun; Bernhard Radlwimmer; Tim Niehues; Gregor von Komorowski; Matthias Dürken; Andreas E Kulozik; Jenny Madden; Andrew Donson; Nicholas K Foreman; Rachid Drissi; Maryam Fouladi; Wolfram Scheurlen; Andreas von Deimling; Camelia Monoranu; Wolfgang Roggendorf; Christel Herold-Mende; Andreas Unterberg; Christof M Kramm; Jörg Felsberg; Christian Hartmann; Benedikt Wiestler; Wolfgang Wick; Till Milde; Olaf Witt; Anders M Lindroth; Jeremy Schwartzentruber; Damien Faury; Adam Fleming; Magdalena Zakrzewska; Pawel P Liberski; Krzysztof Zakrzewski; Peter Hauser; Miklos Garami; Almos Klekner; Laszlo Bognar; Sorana Morrissy; Florence Cavalli; Michael D Taylor; Peter van Sluis; Jan Koster; Rogier Versteeg; Richard Volckmann; Tom Mikkelsen; Kenneth Aldape; Guido Reifenberger; V Peter Collins; Jacek Majewski; Andrey Korshunov; Peter Lichter; Christoph Plass; Nada Jabado; Stefan M Pfister
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2012-10-16       Impact factor: 31.743

Review 9.  Paediatric and adult glioblastoma: multiform (epi)genomic culprits emerge.

Authors:  Dominik Sturm; Sebastian Bender; David T W Jones; Peter Lichter; Jacques Grill; Oren Becher; Cynthia Hawkins; Jacek Majewski; Chris Jones; Joseph F Costello; Antonio Iavarone; Kenneth Aldape; Cameron W Brennan; Nada Jabado; Stefan M Pfister
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 60.716

10.  Genomic pathway analysis reveals that EZH2 and HDAC4 represent mutually exclusive epigenetic pathways across human cancers.

Authors:  Adam L Cohen; Stephen R Piccolo; Luis Cheng; Rafaella Soldi; Bing Han; W Evan Johnson; Andrea H Bild
Journal:  BMC Med Genomics       Date:  2013-09-30       Impact factor: 3.063

View more
  2 in total

1.  A Voxel-Based Radiographic Analysis Reveals the Biological Character of Proneural-Mesenchymal Transition in Glioblastoma.

Authors:  Tengfei Qi; Xiangqi Meng; Zhenyu Wang; Xinyu Wang; Nan Sun; Jianguang Ming; Lejia Ren; Chuanlu Jiang; Jinquan Cai
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 6.244

2.  Formin-like 1 (FMNL1) Is Associated with Glioblastoma Multiforme Mesenchymal Subtype and Independently Predicts Poor Prognosis.

Authors:  Nayuta Higa; Yoshinari Shinsato; Muhammad Kamil; Takuro Hirano; Tomoko Takajo; Michiko Shimokawa; Kentaro Minami; Masatatsu Yamamoto; Kohichi Kawahara; Hajime Yonezawa; Hirofumi Hirano; Tatsuhiko Furukawa; Koji Yoshimoto; Kazunori Arita
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 5.923

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.