Comparison of the performance of zotarolimus- and everolimus-eluting stents by optical coherence tomography and coronary angioscopy.

Overall stent performance should be characterized by geometric luminal gain acquisition, neointimal coverage of the stent struts, and stabilization of the underlying inflammatory neoatheroma. The aim of this study was to compare the performance of zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES), everolimus-eluting stent (EES) and bare metal stent (BMS) using optical coherence tomography (OCT) and coronary angioscopy. For 36 stented coronary lesions (BMS, 12 lesions; ZES, 11 lesions; EES, 13 lesions) in 27 patients, we calculated neointimal area and uncovered stent strut rate based on OCT findings at 10 months after stent placement. The grades of neointimal coverage and yellow color, both of which were classified from 0 to 3, were also assessed by coronary angioscopy. The plaque area of the ZES lesions was larger than that of the EES lesions (P < 0.05) but smaller than that of the BMS lesions (P < 0.05). The OCT-based uncovered rate of the ZES lesions was less than that of the EES lesions (P < 0.01), but similar to that of the BMS lesions. The stent coverage grade by angioscopy was higher in the ZES lesions than in the EES lesions (P < 0.05), but similar to the BMS lesions. The yellow grade was less in the ZES lesions than in the EES lesions (P < 0.01), but similar to the BMS lesions. ZES might be better than BMS in terms of neointimal thickening, and better than EES in terms of neointimal coverage as well as prevention of neoatheroma formation. ZES may have superior performance compared with EES.