Literature DB >> 26271779

Bayesian models of cognition.

Nick Chater1, Mike Oaksford2, Ulrike Hahn3, Evan Heit4.   

Abstract

There has been a recent explosion in research applying Bayesian models to cognitive phenomena. This development has resulted from the realization that across a wide variety of tasks the fundamental problem the cognitive system confronts is coping with uncertainty. From visual scene recognition to on-line language comprehension, from categorizing stimuli to determining to what degree an argument is convincing, people must deal with the incompleteness of the information they possess to perform these tasks, many of which have important survival-related consequences. This paper provides a review of Bayesian models of cognition, dividing them up by the different aspects of cognition to which they have been applied. The paper begins with a brief review of Bayesian inference. This falls short of a full technical introduction but the reader is referred to the relevant literature for further details. There follows reviews of Bayesian models in Perception, Categorization, Learning and Causality, Language Processing, Inductive Reasoning, Deductive Reasoning, and Argumentation. In all these areas, it is argued that sophisticated Bayesian models are enhancing our understanding of the underlying cognitive computations involved. It is concluded that a major challenge is to extend the evidential basis for these models, especially to accounts of higher level cognition. WIREs Cogn Sci 2010 1 811-823 For further resources related to this article, please visit the WIREs website.
Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Year:  2010        PMID: 26271779     DOI: 10.1002/wcs.79

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci        ISSN: 1939-5078


  11 in total

1.  Sure enough: efficient Bayesian learning and choice.

Authors:  Brad R Foley; Paul Marjoram
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 3.084

2.  Mind, rationality, and cognition: An interdisciplinary debate.

Authors:  Nick Chater; Teppo Felin; David C Funder; Gerd Gigerenzer; Jan J Koenderink; Joachim I Krueger; Denis Noble; Samuel A Nordli; Mike Oaksford; Barry Schwartz; Keith E Stanovich; Peter M Todd
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-04

Review 3.  Bayesian statistical approaches to evaluating cognitive models.

Authors:  Jeffrey Annis; Thomas J Palmeri
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci       Date:  2017-11-28

4.  The close proximity of threat: altered distance perception in the anticipation of pain.

Authors:  Abby Tabor; Mark J Catley; Simon C Gandevia; Michael A Thacker; Charles Spence; G L Moseley
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-05-13

Review 5.  The Bayesian boom: good thing or bad?

Authors:  Ulrike Hahn
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-08-08

6.  Probabilistic Inference: Task Dependency and Individual Differences of Probability Weighting Revealed by Hierarchical Bayesian Modeling.

Authors:  Moritz Boos; Caroline Seer; Florian Lange; Bruno Kopp
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-05-27

Review 7.  Pain: A Statistical Account.

Authors:  Abby Tabor; Michael A Thacker; G Lorimer Moseley; Konrad P Körding
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2017-01-12       Impact factor: 4.475

8.  Interaction in Spoken Word Recognition Models: Feedback Helps.

Authors:  James S Magnuson; Daniel Mirman; Sahil Luthra; Ted Strauss; Harlan D Harris
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-04-03

Review 9.  Rationality, perception, and the all-seeing eye.

Authors:  Teppo Felin; Jan Koenderink; Joachim I Krueger
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-08

10.  On Bayesian problem-solving: helping Bayesians solve simple Bayesian word problems.

Authors:  Miroslav Sirota; Gaëlle Vallée-Tourangeau; Frédéric Vallée-Tourangeau; Marie Juanchich
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-08-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.