Literature DB >> 19243762

Therapeutic ERCP and pregnancy: is the radiation risk for the conceptus trivial?

Eleni T Samara1, John Stratakis, Jean M Enele Melono, Ioannis A Mouzas, Konstantinos Perisinakis, John Damilakis.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Symptomatic choledocholithiasis can be treated during pregnancy. Conceptus doses ranged from 0.1 mGy to 3 mGy in previous studies.
OBJECTIVE: The objectives of the current study were to investigate whether the conceptus dose may exceed the threshold of 10 mGy in the case of a pregnant patient undergoing ERCP, and to provide data for the accurate assessment of a conceptus dose.
DESIGN: Monte Carlo methodology and mathematical anthropomorphic phantoms were used to determine normalized conceptus dose data. Phantoms simulated pregnant patients of different body sizes and gestational stages. Monte Carlo simulations were performed to estimate the efficiency of external shielding.
SETTING: University hospital. PATIENTS: Twenty-four consecutive patients.
INTERVENTIONS: All patients underwent therapeutic ERCP. Exposure parameters and dose-area product were recorded during the procedures. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: The total dose-area product recorded during ERCP procedures ranged between 62 x 10(3) and 491 x 10(3) mGy . cm(2).
RESULTS: Monte Carlo normalized conceptus dose data are presented as a function of kV(p), total filtration, gestational stage, and body mass index. The conceptus dose may exceed 10 mGy when the total dose-area product surpasses 130 mGy . cm(2). LIMITATIONS: Variations of conceptus location and size from the average.
CONCLUSIONS: Conceptus dose from ERCP may occasionally exceed 10 mGy, the dose above which the analytical dose calculation is recommended. The use of external shielding is unnecessary because the associated dose reduction is negligible. The normalized dose data may be used for the accurate estimation of conceptus dose from an ERCP procedure performed on a pregnant patient, regardless of body size, gestational stage, operating parameters, and equipment used.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19243762     DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.05.068

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  16 in total

Review 1.  Risks versus benefits of gastrointestinal endoscopy during pregnancy.

Authors:  Mitchell S Cappell
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2011-10-04       Impact factor: 46.802

2.  ERCP in pregnancy: is it safe?

Authors:  Adel Y Daas; Amir Agha; Haim Pinkas; Jay Mamel; Patrick G Brady
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2009-12

Review 3.  Risks to the fetus from diagnostic imaging during pregnancy: review and proposal of a clinical protocol.

Authors:  Mafalda Gomes; Alexandra Matias; Filipe Macedo
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2015-08-14

4.  Nonradiation ERCP with endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy plus papillary balloon dilation for the treatment of choledocholithiasis during pregnancy.

Authors:  Galip Ersoz; Ilker Turan; Fatih Tekin; Omer Ozutemiz; Oktay Tekesin
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-04-04       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Radiation-Free ERCP in Pregnancy: A "Sound" Approach to Leaving No Stone Unturned.

Authors:  Saurabh Sethi; Nirav Thosani; Subhas Banerjee
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 3.199

6.  Non-radiation endoscopic removal of common bile duct stone assisted with abdominal ultrasonography in a pregnant patient.

Authors:  Qiyang Huang; Yukun Luo; Xiangdong Wang; Jiangyun Meng; Yunsheng Yang
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2014-03-08       Impact factor: 1.314

7.  Radiation dose to patients during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.

Authors:  Jaume Boix; Vicente Lorenzo-Zúñiga
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2011-07-16

8.  Radiation doses to ERCP patients are significantly lower with experienced endoscopists.

Authors:  Jennifer E Jorgensen; Joel H Rubenstein; Mitchell M Goodsitt; Grace H Elta
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2010-04-24       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 9.  ERCP in the management of choledocholithiasis in pregnancy.

Authors:  Calvin H Y Chan; Robert A Enns
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2012-12

10.  Safety of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in pregnancy: Fluoroscopy time and fetal exposure, does it matter?

Authors:  Ioana Smith; Monica Gaidhane; Allen Goode; Michel Kahaleh
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2013-04-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.