| Literature DB >> 26271602 |
Xinhua Xie1, Erik Lötstedt2, Stefan Roither1, Markus Schöffler1, Daniil Kartashov1, Katsumi Midorikawa3, Andrius Baltuška1, Kaoru Yamanouchi4, Markus Kitzler1.
Abstract
Control over the breakage of a certain chemical bond in a molecule by an ultrashort laser pulse has been considered for decades. With the availability of intense non-resonant laser fields it became possible to pre-determine femtosecond to picosecond molecular bond breakage dynamics by controlled distortions of the electronic molecular system on sub-femtosecond time scales using field-sensitive processes such as strong-field ionization or excitation. So far, all successful demonstrations in this area considered only fragmentation reactions, where only one bond is broken and the molecule is split into merely two moieties. Here, using ethylene (C2H4) as an example, we experimentally investigate whether complex fragmentation reactions that involve the breakage of more than one chemical bond can be influenced by parameters of an ultrashort intense laser pulse. We show that the dynamics of removing three electrons by strong-field ionization determines the ratio of fragmentation of the molecular trication into two respectively three moieties. We observe a relative increase of two-body fragmentations with the laser pulse duration by almost an order of magnitude. Supported by quantum chemical simulations we explain our experimental results by the interplay between the dynamics of electron removal and nuclear motion.Entities:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26271602 PMCID: PMC4536518 DOI: 10.1038/srep12877
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1(a) Momentum correlation map for the final products . (b) Fragmentation yield over proton momentum and the asymmetry parameter A as defined in the text for the final products . (c) Momentum distribution in the laser polarization plane for the reaction shown in (b). (d,e) Proton spectra in the laser polarization plane decomposed from (c) based on the asymmetry parameter A. The proton spectra ejected via the concerted () and sequential () fragmentation pathway are shown (d) and (e), respectively. The laser pulse duration and peak intensity are 25 fs and 8 × 1014W/cm2 for all panels. Here and throughout the paper a.u. denotes atomic units.
Figure 2(a) Normalized yield of channels (1) and (2) as a function of laser pulse duration. (b) Normalized yield of channels (3) and (4) as a function of laser pulse duration. The yield of channel (4) is divided into that of the concerted (7) and sequential (8) fragmentation dynamics, respectively. Normalization is such that the sum of the yields of channels (1) to (4) is 1 at each pulse duration. (c) Ratio of two-body vs. three-body yield as a function of laser pulse duration. The laser peak intensity is 8 × 1014W/cm2 for all data points in all panels. All lines are only to guide the eye. (d) Schematics of molecular valence orbitals of neutral ethylene calculated by GAMESS26.
Figure 3(a) Kinetic energy release (KER) distributions for the concerted (7) [red filled squares] and sequential fragmentation (8) [blue open circles] dynamics of fragmentation into the final products . (b) Proton energy spectra for the concerted fragmentation reaction (7) [green triangles] and the first [red squares] and second [blue circles] proton ejected during the sequential fragmentation reaction (8) for a laser pulse duration of 25 fs [light full symbols] and 4.5 fs [dark open symbols]. (c,d) KER distributions for the two-body fragmentation reactions (1) [panel (c)] and (2) [panel (d)] for a laser pulse duration of 25 fs [red squares] and 4.5 fs [blue circles]. The laser peak intensity is 8×1014 W/cm2 for all data points in all panels.
Figure 4(a) Potential energy surfaces (PESs) in the ethylene dication (lower) and trication (upper) calculated by GAMESS as described in the text for the stretch motion of two C-H bonds marked by r1 and r2 in (b). (b) Schematics of the geometry used for the calculation of the PESs shown in (a). See text for details. (c,d) Simulated probability for fragmentation of into two (c) and three (d) moieties along the reactions (1) and (7), respectively, as a function of delay between the second and third ionization step.