Literature DB >> 26270461

Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty for Posttraumatic Sequelae.

Steven J Hattrup1, Robert Waldrop, Joaquin Sanchez-Sotelo.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The sequelae of proximal humeral fractures can produce severe shoulder dysfunction. We assessed the results of reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) for these complex problems.
DESIGN: Retrospective multicenter study.
SETTING: Tertiary care referral hospitals. PATIENTS: A total of 26 patients were identified who had undergone RSA for the sequelae of proximal humeral fractures. Twenty patients had follow-up beyond 2 years, averaging 44 months (range, 27-97). Patients with revision prosthetic surgery were not included in the study. The average age at surgery was 67 years (range, 31-89). INTERVENTION: All patients underwent RSA. In addition, 4 shoulders required allografts to compensate for bone loss, and 1 shoulder concomitant internal fixation of a humeral shaft nonunion. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: The main outcome measurement was the Neer scale. Pain relief, range of motion, and American shoulder and elbow surgeon and Simple shoulder test shoulder outcome scores were also assessed.
RESULTS: Overall results in the 20 patients were considered excellent in 8 shoulders, satisfactory in 6, and unsatisfactory in 6. There was significant improvement in the visual analog pain score to 1.9 (P = 0.005), forward elevation to 137 degrees (P < 0.001), and external rotation to 39 degrees (P = 0.0002). The mean American shoulder and elbow surgeon score was 65 and the mean Simple shoulder test 6. Complications included 1 deep infection, 2 transient brachial plexopathies, and 2 cases of dislocation.
CONCLUSIONS: Reconstruction of the deformed proximal humerus from fracture sequelae with RSA is complex and often requires advanced surgical techniques. Complications are not infrequent and may require further surgery. Nevertheless, satisfactory results can be achieved in most patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26270461     DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000416

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Trauma        ISSN: 0890-5339            Impact factor:   2.512


  12 in total

1.  Expanding roles for reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Peter N Chalmers; Jay D Keener
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2016-03

Review 2.  Primary Versus Salvage Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty for Displaced Proximal Humerus Fractures in the Elderly: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Patrick A Nelson; Changyow C Kwan; Vehniah K Tjong; Michael A Terry; Ujash Sheth
Journal:  J Shoulder Elb Arthroplast       Date:  2020-09-15

3.  Delta Xtend reverse shoulder arthroplasty - Results at a minimum of five years.

Authors:  Craig M Ball
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2019-03-06

Review 4.  The Role of Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty in Management of Proximal Humerus Fractures with Fracture Sequelae: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Authors:  James Holton; Tahir Yousri; George Arealis; Ofer Levy
Journal:  Orthop Rev (Pavia)       Date:  2017-02-24

5.  Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty for Geriatric Proximal Humerus Fracture Dislocation With Concomitant Nerve Injury.

Authors:  Gregory Gasbarro; Jared A Crasto; Jorge Rocha; Sarah Henry; Daiji Kano; Ivan S Tarkin
Journal:  Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil       Date:  2019-06-10

6.  Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for fracture sequelae: How the initial fracture treatment influences the outcomes of joint replacement.

Authors:  Fernando Santana; Eduard Alentorn-Geli; Pau Guirro; Carlos Torrens
Journal:  Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc       Date:  2019-04-11       Impact factor: 1.511

Review 7.  Reverse shoulder arthroplasty in patients aged 65 years or younger: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Mikaël Chelli; Lucas Lo Cunsolo; Marc-Olivier Gauci; Jean-François Gonzalez; Peter Domos; Nicolas Bronsard; Pascal Boileau
Journal:  JSES Open Access       Date:  2019-09-11

Review 8.  The modern reverse shoulder arthroplasty and an updated systematic review for each complication: part I.

Authors:  Sarav S Shah; Benjamin T Gaal; Alexander M Roche; Surena Namdari; Brian M Grawe; Macy Lawler; Stewart Dalton; Joseph J King; Joshua Helmkamp; Grant E Garrigues; Thomas W Wright; Bradley S Schoch; Kyle Flik; Randall J Otto; Richard Jones; Andrew Jawa; Peter McCann; Joseph Abboud; Gabe Horneff; Glen Ross; Richard Friedman; Eric T Ricchetti; Douglas Boardman; Robert Z Tashjian; Lawrence V Gulotta
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2020-09-07

Review 9.  The modern reverse shoulder arthroplasty and an updated systematic review for each complication: part II.

Authors:  Sarav S Shah; Alexander M Roche; Spencer W Sullivan; Benjamin T Gaal; Stewart Dalton; Arjun Sharma; Joseph J King; Brian M Grawe; Surena Namdari; Macy Lawler; Joshua Helmkamp; Grant E Garrigues; Thomas W Wright; Bradley S Schoch; Kyle Flik; Randall J Otto; Richard Jones; Andrew Jawa; Peter McCann; Joseph Abboud; Gabe Horneff; Glen Ross; Richard Friedman; Eric T Ricchetti; Douglas Boardman; Robert Z Tashjian; Lawrence V Gulotta
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2020-09-10

10.  Polyethylene dislocation after a reverse total shoulder arthroplasty with an intact glenohumeral joint.

Authors:  Ethan R Wren; Patrick Noud
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2019-12-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.