Literature DB >> 26269932

Prognostic Factors of Cholangiocarcinoma After Surgical Resection: A Retrospective Study of 293 Patients.

Zhi-yuan Mao1, Xiao-chuan Guo2, Dan Su2, Li-jie Wang2, Ting-ting Zhang2, Li Bai2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cholangiocarcinoma is one of the most common malignancies in China. Surgical resection is the only treatment option; however, diagnosis at advanced stage precludes surgery. Comprehensive knowledge of prognostic markers is missing. Hence, the aim of this study was to determine clinicopathological indexes that would be indicative of prognosis in post-operative cases of cholangiocarcinoma.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 293 cases of cholangiocarcinoma patients attending the 301 Military Hospital in Beijing, China between January 2004 and December 2010 were included in the study. The patients had follow-up history until August 2012. Cox proportional hazards model analysis was performed to identify indexes of prognosis. All indicators were analyzed by univariate and multivariate analysis.
RESULTS: The median follow-up time was 55.90 months, with recurrence and metastasis in 162 cases (55.3%) and death in 223 cases (76.1%). The 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year survival rates were 71.7%, 38.2%, and 10.6%, respectively. The independent risk factors of overall survival were degree of tumor differentiation, TNM stage, surgical margin, intraoperative blood transfusion, tumor location, alkaline phosphatase levels in blood, and relapse.
CONCLUSIONS: Good prognosis in cholangiocarcinoma patients is indicated by highly differentiated tumor, early stages of TNM staging, no resection margin invaded, no intraoperative blood transfusion, intrahepatic tumor, normal alkaline phosphatase levels, and no relapse.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26269932      PMCID: PMC4540057          DOI: 10.12659/MSM.893586

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Sci Monit        ISSN: 1234-1010


Background

Cholangiocarcinoma, a rare form neoplasm originating from the intra- or extra-hepatic bile duct epithelium, accounts for about 3% of gastroenteric tumors and is the second most common primary hepatic neoplasia [1,2]; however, its incidence rate is increasing [3]. Cholangiocarcinoma is also one of the most common cancers in China [4]. Surgical resection is the only curative approach [3]; however, due to delayed diagnosis, resection rates are low. Although some patients undergo surgical therapy, the recurrence rate in those patients is very high [5,6]. The poor prognosis is dependent on a multitude of factors, including tumor differentiation, tumor staging, lymph node metastasis, nerve invasion, intravascular cancer emboli, the depth and distribution of infiltration, tumor size, successful tumor resection, and location of tumor. It has been shown that perioperative blood transfusion is a strong predictor of poor survival after radical hepatectomy for hilar cholangiocarcinoma [7]. Another study showed that a positive resection margin is associated with poor overall survival in peripheral cholangiocarcinoma patients undergoing hepatectomy [8]. In a population-based study, poor performance status, primary tumor location, and sites of advanced disease were found to be relevant to prognosis [9]. Furthermore, patients with unresectable cholangiocarcinoma have limited treatment options with only modest survival advantages [10,11]. All of the aforementioned indices can thus be important indicators for chemotherapeutic decision-making post-surgery. Hence, investigating biological characteristics of cholangiocarcinoma and the associated factors that would inform successful therapeutic regimen is of paramount importance.

Material and Methods

Patients

The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the General Hospital of the Chinese PLA, Beijing, China. Between 2004 and 2010, a total of 397 consecutive patients diagnosed with cholangiocarcinoma underwent surgery in the General Hospital of the Chinese PLA. Of the 397 patients, a total of 293 had follow-up results available and were enrolled in the current study.

Statistical analyses

Unless designated otherwise, results are presented as mean ± standard error of mean (SEM). SPSS19.0 software was used for data analysis. Log-rank test was used for single-factor analysis and Cox regression analysis was used for multivariable survival analysis. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

The 293 enrolled patients included 202 men and 91 women (average 64 years old) with age of onset of cholangiocarcinoma ranging between 40 and 85 years. The clinicopathological characteristics of the enrolled patients are summarized in Table 1. The peak of the onset age was from 50 to 60 years old. Men were comparatively more predisposed to cholangiocarcinoma than females (sex ratio of male to female ranged from 1.5 to 3.0). There were 74 and 219 cases of intra- and extrahepatic tumors, respectively. Classified according to TMN stage, there were 150 in stage 1, 88 in stage 2, 41 in stage 3, and 14 in stage 4. There were 19 cases of well-differentiated, 159 cases of moderately differentiated and 115 cases of poorly differentiated tumors.
Table 1

Clinicopathological characteristics of the enrolled patients.

ProgramGroupPatientsPercentage
GenderMale20268.9
Female9131.1
Age<6413646.4
≥6415753.6
Tumor locationIntrahepatic7425.3
Extrahepatic21974.7
Tumor Size<3 cm16154.9
≥3 cm13245.1
Depth of InvasionTotal infiltration16757.0
Local infiltration12643.0
Lymphatic metastasisYes5117.4
No24282.6
DifferentiationHigh196.5
Medium15954.3
Low11539.2
Nerve InvasionYes9331.7
No20068.3
Vascular cancer embolusYes175.8
No27694.2
TNM StagingI15051.2
II8830.0
III4114.0
IV144.8
Resection MarginPositive7425.3
Negative21974.7
Intraoperative blood loss<500 ml18663.5
≥500 ml10736.5
Blood transfusionYes8930.4
No20469.6
RelapseYes15853.9
No13546.1
ChemotherapyYes41.4
No28998.6
TBILNormal8328.3
High21071.7
DBILNormal8529.0
High20871.0
ALPNormal8228.0
High21172.0
ALTNormal8228.0
High21172.0
Aspartate TransaminaseNormal8729.7
High20670.3
GGTNormal7324.9
High22075.1
Surgical methodNot combined with portal vein resection and repair28496.9
Combined with portal vein resection and repair93.1
History of hepatitisYes186.1
No27593.9
StoneYes3110.6
No26289.4
Cholecystectomy before the illnessYes3612.3
No25787.7
Patients were followed up until August 31, 2012, with an interval of 6 months. The 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year survival rates were 71.7%, 38.2%, and 10.9%, respectively. We next determined the relationship of all observed indexes and postoperative prognosis using log-rank single-factor analysis (Table 2). Thirteen indexes were significantly correlated (P<0.05): depth of invasion, lymphatic metastasis, tumor differentiation, TNM staging, resection margin invasion, blood transfusion during surgery, total bilirubin (TBIL), conjugated or direct bilirubin (DBIL), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), alanine transaminase (ALT), aspartate transaminase (AST), gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT), and relapse status (Table 2).
Table 2

Single factor analysis for cholangiocarcinoma clinical data and treatment characteristics.

FactorGroupPatientsMedian survival time (months)95%CIP-value
GenderMale20221.2015.629~26.7710.981
Female9120.6711.662~29.678
Age<6413621.2015.649~26.7510.585
≥6415720.9714.108~27.832
Tumor locationIntrahepatic7421.2011.863~30.5370.725
Extrahepatic21920.9715.377~26.563
Tumor size<3 cm16125.0017.225~32.7750.328
≥3 cm13217.4312.146~22.714
Depth of invasionTotal infiltration16727.4717.339~37.6010.012
Local infiltration12615.8314.078~17.582
Lymphatic metastasisYes5126.2320.032~32.4280.000
No24214.2711.711~16.829
DifferentiationHigh1949.7728.916~70.6240.001
Medium15927.4719.620~35.320
Low11515.2313.128~17.332
Nerve InvasionYes9317.4712.229~22.7110.157
No20024.0316.733~31.327
Vascular cancer embolusYes1714.676.737~22.6030.227
No27621.5016.151~26.849
TNM stagingI15037.3329.075~45.5850.000
II8815.6713.372~17.968
III4116.937.232~26.628
IV147.401.955~12.845
Resection MarginPositive7420.6714.365~26.9750.010
Negative21922.4015.055~29.745
Intraoperative blood loss<500 ml18626.2718.545~33.9950.199
≥500 ml10715.9010.131~21.669
Blood transfusionYes8913.4311.037~15.8230.001
No20427.9320.505~35.355
RelapseYes15818.1014.458~21.7420.000
No13531.503.236~59.764
ChemotherapyYes418.100.000~41.7470.745
No28921.2016.030~26.370
TBILNormal8328.9315.172~42.6880.025
High21018.1014.466~21.734
DBILNormal8528.9315.007~42.8530.032
High20818.1014.483~21.717
ALPNormal8236.5318.820~54.2400.002
High21117.4314.230~20.630
ALTNormal8236.9019.399~54.4010.002
High21118.1014.105~21.795
ASTNormal8730.5711.745~49.3950.014
High20618.1313.635~22.625
GGTNormal7341.3022.698~59.9020.003
High22017.4314.034~20.826
Surgical methodNot combined with portal vein resection and repair28420.9716.048~25.8920.320
Combined with portal vein resection and repair925.370.000~80.796
History of hepatitisYes1841.3015.171~67.4290.072
No27520.5316.086~24.974
StoneYes3115.9011.646~20.1540.099
No26221.5016.418~26.582
Cholecystectomy before the illnessYes3616.4014.783~18.0170.243
No25721.7316.743~26.717
The risk of death with poor differentiation was 1.356 times that of medium differentiation, while the latter is 1.356 times that of high differentiation. The risk of death increased by 1.379 times as TNM staging increases a level. The risk of death on patients with positive resection margins was 1.404 times that of patients with negative resection margins. Intrahepatic tumors caused a risk of death 0.594 times that of extrahepatic ones. Patients who received blood transfusion during the operation had a risk of death 1.493 times that of those who did not receive a transfusion. Relapsed patients had a risk of death 1.962 times that of those who did not exhibit a relapse. Patients who had high ALP in blood had a risk of death 1.954 times that of those who had normal ALP. All 13 indexes were used in Cox model regression analysis. With α=0.05, we were able to import independent factors related to cholangiocarcinoma postoperative prognosis because all variables passed the Cox multivariable analysis (Table 3).
Table 3

Multivariable regression analysis of cholangiocarcinoma using Cox proportional hazard model.

ParameterRegression parameter estimation (B)Standard errors (BE)WaldDegree of freedomP-value (Sig)Relative risk (B)95% CI for Exp (B)
Differentiation0.3040.1156.95310.0081.3561.081~1.699
TNM staging0.3220.07916.54810.0001.3791.181~1.610
Resection margin0.3390.1544.83210.0281.4041.037~1.899
Tumor location−0.5200.1907.49610.0060.5940.410~0.863
Blood transfusion0.4010.1447.70410.0061.4931.125~1.982
Relapse0.6740.14920.51110.0001.9621.466~2.627
ALP0.6700.19212.23510.0001.9541.342~2.844

Discussion

The morbidity of cholangiocarcinoma has been increasing in recent years. The prognoses of advanced cholangiocarcinoma cases are very poor, with median survival time less than 1 year [12]. Thus, it is imperative to develop comprehensive treatment strategies that consider all 13 factors that affect treatment outcome. Most cholangiocarcinoma patients are diagnosed at an advanced, unresectable stage. Even in those who can receive resection, there is high risk of relapse. We thus performed the initial single-factor analysis, which would allow subsequent multi-factor analysis with a subset of indicator indexes. As summarized in Table 2, our analysis revealed 13 indexes that could affect prognosis in cholangiocarcinoma patients. It has been previously shown that portal involvement by hilar cholangiocarcinoma was not a significant contraindication for surgical resection [13-15]. Given that most diagnosed cases are in advanced stage of the disease and do not receive surgical resection, it is difficult to investigate the true effect of surgical resection and disease prognosis. Tumor differentiation status was also previously shown to have significant effect on prognosis [14,15]. Prognoses are poorer on low-differentiated tumors than on high-differentiated ones. This is mainly because low-differentiated cancers are prone to early metastasis. Our research also shows that prognoses of cancers with low differentiation are poorer than of those with medium or high differentiation. Thus, making sure about the degree of differentiation as early as possible can help in deciding the best treating method. There are 2 possible methods to help in diagnosis: one is preoperative biopsy diagnosis and the other is intraoperative frozen pathological diagnosis. Tumor stages have also been related with prognosis [16]. Early stages indicate that tumors are confined to local metastasis, and late stages indicate that tumors might have already had distant metastasis. Locally-confined tumors are easier to totally resect. However, tumors that have already had distant metastasis are not likely to be totally removed by surgery. Early stages of cholangiocarcinoma do not have obvious clinical manifestation; instead, there could only be jaundice or pruritus. Existence of obvious clinical manifestation means that cholangiocarcinoma is already in advanced stage. Recently, more methods are used to diagnose cholangiocarcinoma. Imaging diagnosis can find cholangiectasis at early stages. It is widely believed that resection margin infiltrated by cancer cells indicate a poor prognosis [17]. A positive resection margin usually indicates that tumor is removed generally, but not a complete cure when examined microscopically. It has been shown that the length of cholangiocarcinoma cells invaded mucosa are usually shorter than 10 mm [17]. Thus, surgical resects 10 mm away from the tumor could achieve a non-invaded resection margin. As we performed single-factor analysis, the statistical tests on tumor location have no statistical interpretation. But when doing multi-factor analysis, tumor location has difference in statistical tests, which indicates multi-factor interaction influences. It has been shown that the 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year survival rates for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma are 62%, 24%, and 20%, respectively, and the median survival time is 16.9 months. The 1-year, 3-year and 5-year survival rates for hilar cholangiocarcinoma are 49%, 16%, and 8%, respectively, and the median survival time is 11.7 months [3]. Statistical differences exist within the survival time, which corroborates the findings of the current study. It has been suggested before that intraoperative blood transfusion could increase the chance of relapse of malignant tumors [18]. Whether blood transfusion is taken during the operation indicates intraoperative blood loss or preoperative anemia. The exact mechanism by which intraoperative blood transfusion effects prognosis is still not clear, but research shows that blood transfusion could cause immune system adjustment by inhibiting the immune function of recipients and causing a drop in antibody level. Thus, if intraoperative blood transfusion is necessary, autologous transfusion, blood component transfusion, and in-need transfusion are available.

Conclusions

Highly differentiated tumor, early stages of TNM staging, no resection margin invaded, no intraoperative blood transfusion, intrahepatic tumor, normal ALP levels and no relapse are associated with good prognosis of cholangiocarcinoma. Initial results from ongoing clinical trials have indicated that chemotherapy response rate, disease control rate, and overall survival have a significant correlation [19-23]. Thus it is imperative to explore adjuvant, neoadjuvant, and first-line chemotherapy to gain understanding and provide reference value for comprehensive treatment strategies for cholangiocarcinoma.
  23 in total

Review 1.  Biliary tract cancers.

Authors:  P C de Groen; G J Gores; N F LaRusso; L L Gunderson; D M Nagorney
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1999-10-28       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Treatment of inoperable and/or metastatic biliary tree carcinomas with single-agent gemcitabine or in combination with levofolinic acid and infusional fluorouracil: results of a multicenter phase II study.

Authors:  V Gebbia; F Giuliani; E Maiello; G Colucci; F Verderame; N Borsellino; G Mauceri; M Caruso; M L Tirrito; M Valdesi
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2001-10-15       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Hilar cholangiocarcinoma involving the portal vein bifurcation: long-term results after resection.

Authors:  Luis Muñoz; Sasan Roayaie; Daniel Maman; Thomas Fishbein; Patricia Sheiner; Sukru Emre; Charles Miller; Myron E Schwartz
Journal:  J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg       Date:  2002

4.  Cisplatin plus gemcitabine versus gemcitabine for biliary tract cancer.

Authors:  Juan Valle; Harpreet Wasan; Daniel H Palmer; David Cunningham; Alan Anthoney; Anthony Maraveyas; Srinivasan Madhusudan; Tim Iveson; Sharon Hughes; Stephen P Pereira; Michael Roughton; John Bridgewater
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-04-08       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Epidemiology of primary and secondary liver cancers.

Authors:  Ashwin Ananthakrishnan; Veena Gogineni; Kia Saeian
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 1.513

Review 6.  Reports from the International Liver Cancer Association (ILCA) congress 2014.

Authors:  Jean-Charles Nault
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  2014-11-22       Impact factor: 25.083

7.  Major hepatic resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: analysis of 46 patients.

Authors:  David J Rea; Manuel Munoz-Juarez; Michael B Farnell; John H Donohue; Florencia G Que; Brian Crownhart; Dirk Larson; David M Nagorney
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2004-05

8.  Mitomycin C in combination with capecitabine or biweekly high-dose gemcitabine in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer: a randomised phase II trial.

Authors:  G V Kornek; B Schuell; F Laengle; T Gruenberger; M Penz; K Karall; D Depisch; F Lang; W Scheithauer
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 32.976

9.  Phase III study of 5FU, etoposide and leucovorin (FELV) compared to epirubicin, cisplatin and 5FU (ECF) in previously untreated patients with advanced biliary cancer.

Authors:  S Rao; D Cunningham; R E Hawkins; M E Hill; D Smith; F Daniel; P J Ross; J Oates; A R Norman
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2005-05-09       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 10.  Advances in diagnosis and treatment of hilar cholangiocarcinoma -- a review.

Authors:  Geng Zhimin; Hidayatullah Noor; Zheng Jian-Bo; Wang Lin; Rajiv Kumar Jha
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2013-08-07
View more
  7 in total

1.  Impact of adjuvant chemoradiation on survival in patients with resectable cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Laura L Dover; Robert A Oster; Andrew M McDonald; Derek A DuBay; Thomas N Wang; Rojymon Jacob
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2016-08-16       Impact factor: 3.647

Review 2.  Novel approaches in search for biomarkers of cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Lavinia-Patricia Mocan; Maria Ilieș; Carmen Stanca Melincovici; Mihaela Spârchez; Rareș Crăciun; Iuliana Nenu; Adelina Horhat; Cristian Tefas; Zeno Spârchez; Cristina Adela Iuga; Tudor Mocan; Carmen Mihaela Mihu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2022-04-21       Impact factor: 5.374

3.  Downregulated Expression of Tropomyosin 1 in Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: A Predictor of Recurrence and Prognosis.

Authors:  Yan Chen; Zhixian Hong; Shanshan Lu; Ning Zhang; Guanghua Rong; Xiujuan Chang; Ze Liu; Wenlin Bai; Zheng Dong; Xudong Gao; Zhen Zeng; Yinying Lu
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2018-11-03

Review 4.  The Significance of Adjuvant Therapy for Extrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma After Surgery.

Authors:  Lijuan Ding; Lihua Dong; Gaoyuan Wang; Qiang Wang; Xia Fan
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2019-12-30       Impact factor: 3.989

5.  Adaptor protein XB130 regulates the aggressiveness of cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Pirawan Poosekeaw; Chawalit Pairojkul; Banchob Sripa; Prakasit Sa Ngiamwibool; Sitthichai Iamsaard; Chadamas Sakonsinsiri; Raynoo Thanan; Piti Ungarreevittaya
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-11-15       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Machine learning-based Radiomics analysis for differentiation degree and lymphatic node metastasis of extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Yong Tang; Chun Mei Yang; Song Su; Wei Jia Wang; Li Ping Fan; Jian Shu
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2021-11-24       Impact factor: 4.430

7.  Comparison of the clinical results of surgical resection for extrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas: Hilar cholangiocarcinoma and mid-to-distal cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Pyung Jung; Eung-Ho Cho; Sang-Bum Kim; Ryoung-Go Kim
Journal:  Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg       Date:  2019-11-29
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.