AIM: Coronary artery calcium (CAC) score has a role in stratifying cardiovascular risk in patients with diabetes. Cardio-ankle vascular index (CAVI) is also a useful method to detect coronary artery calcification. This study compares CAC score with CAVI in the prediction of cardiovascular events in patients with diabetes. METHODS: From August 2006 to June 2008, a total of 626 patients with diabetes who received CAC score assessment with concomitant tests of ankle-brachial index and CAVI were included in this study. RESULTS: During 4 years of follow-up, 98 participants developed cardiovascular events. There is an increased incidence of coronary revascularization and total cardiovascular events with higher categories of CAC score (P ＜ 0.05 when CAC score ≥ 100). The logistic regression analyses revealed pooled odd ratios for coronary revascularization, and total cardiovascular events were 1.25 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.03- 1.51, P =0.021] and 1.23 (95% CI 1.07-1.42, P = 0.005), respectively, for high versus low CAVI (CAVI ≥ 9.0 vs CAVI ＜ 9.0). The logistic regression model revealed that a CACscore of ≥ 1000 rather than a CAVI of ≥ 9.0 had a higher predictive value for total cardiovascular events. CONCLUSIONS: A CAC score of ≥ 100 or a CAVI of ≥ 9.0 predicts future total cardiovascular events in asymptomatic patients with type 2 diabetes. Considering the advantages of CAVI, it can be used as one of the screening tools to reflect coronary atherosclerosis in these patients.
AIM: Coronary artery calcium (CAC) score has a role in stratifying cardiovascular risk in patients with diabetes. Cardio-ankle vascular index (CAVI) is also a useful method to detect coronary artery calcification. This study compares CAC score with CAVI in the prediction of cardiovascular events in patients with diabetes. METHODS: From August 2006 to June 2008, a total of 626 patients with diabetes who received CAC score assessment with concomitant tests of ankle-brachial index and CAVI were included in this study. RESULTS: During 4 years of follow-up, 98 participants developed cardiovascular events. There is an increased incidence of coronary revascularization and total cardiovascular events with higher categories of CAC score (P ＜ 0.05 when CAC score ≥ 100). The logistic regression analyses revealed pooled odd ratios for coronary revascularization, and total cardiovascular events were 1.25 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.03- 1.51, P =0.021] and 1.23 (95% CI 1.07-1.42, P = 0.005), respectively, for high versus low CAVI (CAVI ≥ 9.0 vs CAVI ＜ 9.0). The logistic regression model revealed that a CACscore of ≥ 1000 rather than a CAVI of ≥ 9.0 had a higher predictive value for total cardiovascular events. CONCLUSIONS: A CAC score of ≥ 100 or a CAVI of ≥ 9.0 predicts future total cardiovascular events in asymptomatic patients with type 2 diabetes. Considering the advantages of CAVI, it can be used as one of the screening tools to reflect coronary atherosclerosis in these patients.
Authors: Kunihiro Matsushita; Ning Ding; Esther D Kim; Matthew Budoff; Julio A Chirinos; Bo Fernhall; Naomi M Hamburg; Kazuomi Kario; Toru Miyoshi; Hirofumi Tanaka; Raymond Townsend Journal: J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) Date: 2018-11-19 Impact factor: 3.738