Andrea Cercek1, Jennifer Wheler2, Peter E Murray3, Shawn Zhou3, Leonard Saltz4. 1. Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 300 East 66th Street, New York, NY, 10065, USA. cerceka@mkscc.org. 2. MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA. 3. Aptose Biosciences, San Diego, CA, USA. 4. Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 300 East 66th Street, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: This phase I, multicenter, open-label, single-arm, dose-escalation study evaluated the safety, pharmacokinetics and antitumor activity of APTO-253, an inducer of the transcription factor KLF4, in adults with advanced solid tumors. METHODS: APTO-253 was administered IV on days 1 and 2, and 15 and 16 of each 28 day cycle; the dose were escalated from 20 to 387 mg/m(2) in 9 cohorts until DLT was observed. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients were treated on this trial (50 % colon cancer, 22 % other gastrointenstinal malignancies and 18 % non-small cell lung cancer). Fatigue was the only drug-related treatment-emergent adverse event to occur in >10 % of patients. Dose-limiting toxicities of hypersensitivity reaction and transient hypotension despite prophylaxis occurred at 387 mg/m(2) which led to identification of 298 mg/m(2) as the MTD. Only 1 patient had any drug-related treatment-emergent grade 3 adverse event at or below 229 mg/m(2). A total of 21 patients underwent at least one restaging after 2 cycles; 11 patients discontinued prior to the end of cycle 2 due to adverse events (9) or disease progression (2). The best overall response was stable disease (SD) in 5 of these 21 (23.8 %) with durations ranging from 3.6 to 8.4 months. CONCLUSION: APTO-253 was well tolerated at the Phase 2 recommended dose and produced evidence of antitumor activity in the form of stable disease in patients with advanced solid tumors. Based on the drug levels achieved and the lower frequency of treatment-emergent adverse events encountered, 229 mg/m(2) was selected as the recommended Phase 2 dose. Overall APTO-253 was found to be well tolerated and to have favorable pharmacokinetics, and treatment was associated with stable disease in 5 of 21 (24 %) of patients with far advanced solid tumors.
INTRODUCTION: This phase I, multicenter, open-label, single-arm, dose-escalation study evaluated the safety, pharmacokinetics and antitumor activity of APTO-253, an inducer of the transcription factor KLF4, in adults with advanced solid tumors. METHODS: APTO-253 was administered IV on days 1 and 2, and 15 and 16 of each 28 day cycle; the dose were escalated from 20 to 387 mg/m(2) in 9 cohorts until DLT was observed. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients were treated on this trial (50 % colon cancer, 22 % other gastrointenstinal malignancies and 18 % non-small cell lung cancer). Fatigue was the only drug-related treatment-emergent adverse event to occur in >10 % of patients. Dose-limiting toxicities of hypersensitivity reaction and transient hypotension despite prophylaxis occurred at 387 mg/m(2) which led to identification of 298 mg/m(2) as the MTD. Only 1 patient had any drug-related treatment-emergent grade 3 adverse event at or below 229 mg/m(2). A total of 21 patients underwent at least one restaging after 2 cycles; 11 patients discontinued prior to the end of cycle 2 due to adverse events (9) or disease progression (2). The best overall response was stable disease (SD) in 5 of these 21 (23.8 %) with durations ranging from 3.6 to 8.4 months. CONCLUSION: APTO-253 was well tolerated at the Phase 2 recommended dose and produced evidence of antitumor activity in the form of stable disease in patients with advanced solid tumors. Based on the drug levels achieved and the lower frequency of treatment-emergent adverse events encountered, 229 mg/m(2) was selected as the recommended Phase 2 dose. Overall APTO-253 was found to be well tolerated and to have favorable pharmacokinetics, and treatment was associated with stable disease in 5 of 21 (24 %) of patients with far advanced solid tumors.
Authors: W Zhang; D E Geiman; J M Shields; D T Dang; C S Mahatan; K H Kaestner; J R Biggs; A S Kraft; V W Yang Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2000-06-16 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Weidong Zhao; Irfan M Hisamuddin; Mandayam O Nandan; Brian A Babbin; Neil E Lamb; Vincent W Yang Journal: Oncogene Date: 2004-01-15 Impact factor: 9.867
Authors: E A Eisenhauer; P Therasse; J Bogaerts; L H Schwartz; D Sargent; R Ford; J Dancey; S Arbuck; S Gwyther; M Mooney; L Rubinstein; L Shankar; L Dodd; R Kaplan; D Lacombe; J Verweij Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 2009-01 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: Wenxian Hu; Wayne L Hofstetter; Hong Li; Yanbin Zhou; Yong He; Abujiang Pataer; Li Wang; Keping Xie; Stephen G Swisher; Bingliang Fang Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2009-09-08 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Cheng-Yu Tsai; Si Sun; Hongying Zhang; Andrea Local; Yongxuan Su; Larry A Gross; William G Rice; Stephen B Howell Journal: Mol Cancer Ther Date: 2018-04-06 Impact factor: 6.261
Authors: Ana E Paiva; Luiza Lousado; Daniel A P Guerra; Patrick O Azevedo; Isadora F G Sena; Julia P Andreotti; Gabryella S P Santos; Ricardo Gonçalves; Akiva Mintz; Alexander Birbrair Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2018-05-22 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Rongrong Zhao; Zhengxia Liu; Wenting Xu; Le Song; Haifeng Ren; Yang Ou; Yakun Liu; Siying Wang Journal: Cancer Med Date: 2020-02-04 Impact factor: 4.452