Literature DB >> 26268823

Functional imaging for chest pain in the emergency room: To do or not to do?

Himanshu Gupta1,2.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2015        PMID： 26268823     DOI： 10.1007/s12350-015-0225-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol        ISSN： 1071-3581            Impact factor:   5.952


× No keyword cloud information.
  7 in total

Review 1.  Finding the Gatekeeper to the Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory: Coronary CT Angiography or Stress Testing?

Authors:  Thomas H Marwick; Iksung Cho; Bríain Ó Hartaigh; James K Min
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2015-06-30       Impact factor: 24.094

2.  Outcomes of anatomical versus functional testing for coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Pamela S Douglas; Udo Hoffmann; Manesh R Patel; Daniel B Mark; Hussein R Al-Khalidi; Brendan Cavanaugh; Jason Cole; Rowena J Dolor; Christopher B Fordyce; Megan Huang; Muhammad Akram Khan; Andrzej S Kosinski; Mitchell W Krucoff; Vinay Malhotra; Michael H Picard; James E Udelson; Eric J Velazquez; Eric Yow; Lawton S Cooper; Kerry L Lee
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2015-03-14       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Cost-effectiveness of functional cardiac testing in the diagnosis and management of coronary artery disease: a randomised controlled trial. The CECaT trial.

Authors:  L Sharples; V Hughes; A Crean; M Dyer; M Buxton; K Goldsmith; D Stone
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 4.014

4.  Comparison of stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) with stress nuclear perfusion for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Ijaz G Ahmad; Raushan K Abdulla; Igor Klem; Roman Margulis; Alexander Ivanov; Ambreen Mohamed; Robert M Judd; Salvatore Borges-Neto; Raymond J Kim; John F Heitner
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2015-08-13       Impact factor: 5.952

5.  Design and rationale of the MR-INFORM study: stress perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging to guide the management of patients with stable coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Shazia T Hussain; Matthias Paul; Sven Plein; Gerry P McCann; Ajay M Shah; Michael S Marber; Amedeo Chiribiri; Geraint Morton; Simon Redwood; Philip MacCarthy; Andreas Schuster; Masaki Ishida; Mark A Westwood; Divaka Perera; Eike Nagel
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2012-09-19       Impact factor: 5.364

6.  Direct comparison of cardiovascular magnetic resonance and single-photon emission computed tomography for detection of coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lihua Chen; Xiao Wang; Jing Bao; Chengjun Geng; Yunbao Xia; Jian Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-10       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Rationale and design of the Clinical Evaluation of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Coronary heart disease 2 trial (CE-MARC 2): a prospective, multicenter, randomized trial of diagnostic strategies in suspected coronary heart disease.

Authors:  David P Ripley; Julia M Brown; Colin C Everett; Petra Bijsterveld; Simon Walker; Mark Sculpher; Gerry P McCann; Colin Berry; Sven Plein; John P Greenwood
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2014-10-22       Impact factor: 4.749
  7 in total
  1 in total

Review 1.  Review of cardiovascular imaging in the journal of nuclear cardiology in 2015. Part 1 of 2: Plaque imaging, positron emission tomography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Wael A AlJaroudi; Fadi G Hage
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2015-11-05       Impact factor: 5.952
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.