Literature DB >> 2626829

The gap effect revisited: slow changes in chromatic sensitivity as affected by luminance and chromatic borders.

R T Eskew1.   

Abstract

Chromatic discrimination was studied with two half-fields that were either precisely juxtaposed or were separated by a narrow gap. When present, the gap was in some conditions filled with light isoluminant to the test fields. When the fields were juxtaposed, chromatic sensitivity declined with viewing duration. For a discrimination based solely on S cone activity, separating steadily-viewed fields by either a luminance or a purely chromatic gap caused similar enhancements of sensitivity. Neither type of gap had much effect when the fields were flashed. The results may be interpreted as showing that either a luminance or chromatic contour can spatially delimit the two half-fields, thus preventing a slow spatial integration from reducing the discriminability of the two sides of the field.

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2626829     DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(89)90034-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  4 in total

1.  Neural dynamics of motion perception: direction fields, apertures, and resonant grouping.

Authors:  S Grossberg; E Mingolla
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1993-03

Review 2.  3-D vision and figure-ground separation by visual cortex.

Authors:  S Grossberg
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1994-01

3.  The gap effect is exaggerated in parafovea.

Authors:  Marina Danilova; John Mollon
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  2006 May-Aug       Impact factor: 3.241

Review 4.  Visual search, visual streams, and visual architectures.

Authors:  M Green
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1991-10
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.