| Literature DB >> 26266793 |
Emre Almac1, Tanja Johannes, Rick Bezemer, Egbert G Mik, Klaus E Unertl, A B Johan Groeneveld, Can Ince.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: We aimed to test whether continuous recombinant human activated protein C (APC) administration would be able to protect renal oxygenation and function during endotoxemia in order to provide more insight into the role of coagulation and inflammation in the development of septic acute kidney injury.Entities:
Year: 2013 PMID: 26266793 PMCID: PMC4796218 DOI: 10.1186/2197-425X-1-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Intensive Care Med Exp ISSN: 2197-425X
Systemic and renal hemodynamic variables in the renal cortex and medulla at three sampling points
| BL ( | LPS ( | FR ( | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MAP (mmHg) | ||||||||
| Time control | 99 | (97–103) | 99 | (94–99) | 90 | (85–94) | ||
| LPS + FR | 102 | (96–109) | 77 | (73–93) |
| 68 | (44–79) |
|
| APC10 | 100 | (99–102) | 76 | (69–84) |
| 72 | (59–78) |
|
| APC100 | 102 | (102–103) | 78 | (76–92) |
| 81 | (70–89) |
|
| RBF (mL/min) | ||||||||
| Time control | 6.2 | (5.8-6.3) | 5.9 | (4.7-6.1) | 5.1 | (4.7-5.8) | ||
| LPS + FR | 6.8 | (6.0-6.8) | 3.1 | (3.1-3.3) |
| 4.6 | (2.2-5.1) |
|
| APC10 | 6.6 | (5.0-7.1) | 3.2 | (1.7-4.5) |
| 4.1 | (2.8-5.1) |
|
| APC100 | 6.0 | (5.9-6.8) | 3.2 | (2.3-4.2) |
| 4.2 | (2.8-4.7) |
|
| RVR (dyn s−1 cm−5) | ||||||||
| Time control | 1,319 | (1,251-1,373) | 1,347 | (1,301-1,579) | 1,332 | (1,280-1,558) | ||
| LPS + FR | 1,276 | (1,183-1,407) | 1,901 | (1,620-2,673) |
| 1,311 | (828–2,314) | |
| APC10 | 1,267 | (1,124-1,635) | 2,086 | (1,353-3,222) |
| 1,371 | (938–2,038) | |
| APC100 | 1,331 | (1,203-1,407) | 2,024 | (1,761-2,743) |
| 1,636 | (1,383-1,864) | |
| Hb (g/dL) | ||||||||
| Time control | 0.19 | (0.18-0.20) | 0.18 | (0.17-0.20) | 0.18 | (0.15-0.19) | ||
| LPS + FR | 0.19 | (0.17-0.20) | 0.17 | (0.17-0.18) | 0.13 | (0.12-0.14) |
| |
| APC10 | 0.19 | (0.18-0.20) | 0.19 | (0.17-0.20) | 0.13 | (0.12-0.14) |
| |
| APC100 | 0.19 | (0.18-0.19) | 0.18 | (0.17-0.19) | 0.13 | (0.11-0.14) |
| |
| DO2 (mL O2/min/g) | ||||||||
| Time control | 0.90 | (0.82-0.95) | 0.80 | (0.60-0.93) | 0.69 | (0.56-0.78) | ||
| LPS + FR | 0.87 | (0.77-0.96) | 0.39 | (0.37-0.43) |
| 0.46 | (0.22-0.48) |
|
| APC10 | 0.89 | (0.81-0.99) | 0.41 | (0.26-0.63) |
| 0.40 | (0.25-0.52) |
|
| APC100 | 0.85 | (0.80-0.97) | 0.45 | (0.28-0.61) |
| 0.37 | (0.29-0.49) |
|
| VO2 (mL O2/min/g) | ||||||||
| Time control | 0.16 | (0.12-0.20) | 0.18 | (0.08-0.26) | 0.18 | (0.16-0.19) | ||
| LPS + FR | 0.13 | (0.12-0.17) | 0.11 | (0.08-0.15) | 0.17 | (0.11-0.18) | ||
| APC10 | 0.18 | (0.12-0.19) | 0.13 | (0.07-0.16) | 0.14 | (0.11-0.20) | ||
| APC100 | 0.17 | (0.13-0.24) | 0.12 | (0.10-0.17) | 0.16 | (0.14-0.21) | ||
| CμPO2 (mmHg) | ||||||||
| Time control | 86 | (82–87) | 85 | (78–92) | 71 | (66–79) | ||
| LPS + FR | 83 | (77–87) | 69 | (65–77) |
| 49 | (43–51) |
|
| APC10 | 82 | (81–87) | 75 | (65–83) |
| 56 | (49–59) |
|
| APC100 | 80 | (75–88) | 67 | (64–75) |
| 68 | (54–71) | |
| MμPO2 (mmHg) | ||||||||
| Time control | 65 | (59–66) | 62 | (57–67) | 58 | (53–60) | ||
| LPS + FR | 55 | (51–66) | 55 | (50–57) |
| 40 | (35–44) |
|
| APC10 | 62 | (55–64) | 53 | (47–60) |
| 45 | (39–49) |
|
| APC100 | 59 | (55–69) | 55 | (49–59) |
| 55 | (49–58) | |
Data are presented as median (25% to 75% percentiles). MAP, mean arterial pressure; RBF, renal blood flow; RVR, renal vascular resistance; Hb, arterial hemoglobin level; DO2, renal oxygen delivery; VO2, renal oxygen consumption; CμPO2, microvascular oxygen tension in the renal cortex; microvascular oxygen tension in the medulla (MμPO2); BL, baseline (BL); LPS, lipopolysaccharide; FR, fluid resuscitation. T p < 0.05 vs time control.
Figure 1DO , VO , T , VO / T , and creatinine clearance rate at the end of protocol. Data are presented as Whisker boxes and range. T p < 0.05 vs time control; F p < 0.05 vs LPS + FR. (A) Renal oxygen delivery and consumption, (B) renal sodium reabsorption, (C) renal oxygen handling, and (D) renal creatinine clearance rate.
Figure 2Renal sodium reabsorption (T ) versus the microvascular oxygenation. In the renal cortex (A) and medulla (B) at the end of the protocol in all groups.