Literature DB >> 26266190

Fluid Administration Before Caesarean Delivery: Does Type and Timing Matter?

Poonam Arora1, Rupinder M Singh2, Sandeep Kundra3, Parshotam Lal Gautam2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of fluid preloading is in doubt, so co-loading has been attempted to reduce the incidence of spinal anaesthesia induced hypotension in caesarean patients. AIM: To compare crystalloid preloading, colloid preloading and colloid co-loading for prevention of maternal hypotension in caesarean delivery. SETTINGS AND
DESIGN: Study conducted in tertiary level hospital on 90 ASA I/II term parturients posted for elective caesarean section. Patients were randomly allocated to three Groups.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Group A (n=30) was given 10 ml/kg of 6% hydroxyethyl starch (HES) 20 minutes prior to spinal anaesthesia, Group B (n=30) was given 10 ml/kg of 6% HES by rapid infusion in 10 minutes immediately after spinal anaesthesia and Group C (n=30) was given 10 ml/kg of Ringer's Lactate 20 minutes prior to spinal anaesthesia. Intraoperatively, Heart rate, systolic, diastolic and mean arterial pressure were recorded every five minutes. Episodes of hypotension were recorded and treated with bolus of 5 mg of ephedrine and total amount of ephedrine was noted. Adverse effects, if any were recorded. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: ANNOVA for Quantitative Analysis and chi-Square test and Z-test for Qualitative Analysis.
RESULTS: Baseline parameters were similar in all the three Groups. Heart rate decreased from the baseline in all the three Groups, however, mean heart rate was highest in Group C. Heart rate was statistically similar in Groups A and B. MAP decreased in all three Groups from baseline, however, highest fall was recorded in Group C whereas, MAP was statistically similar in Groups A and B. Incidence of hypotension was 66.66% in Group C as compared to 36.66% in Groups A and 40% in Group B respectively. Group C patients received 5.33±4.54 mg of ephedrine as compared to 2.00±2.82 mg in Group A and 2.33±3.14 mg in Group B. Thus, the incidence of hypotension and ephedrine consumption was significantly higher in Group C as compared to Groups A and B whereas, this difference was statistically not significant among Groups A and B.
CONCLUSION: Colloid preloading and co-loading are equally effective and both are superior to crystalloid preloading for prevention of maternal hypotension in caesarean section patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Co-loading; Crystalloids; Preloading

Year:  2015        PMID: 26266190      PMCID: PMC4525580          DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2015/12083.6008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res        ISSN: 0973-709X


  14 in total

Review 1.  Pathophysiology and clinical implications of perioperative fluid excess.

Authors:  K Holte; N E Sharrock; H Kehlet
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 9.166

2.  Combined use of crystalloid preload and low dose spinal anesthesia for preventing hypotension in spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Sonia Ouerghi; Mohamed A Bougacha; Nabil Frikha; Taher Mestiri; Mohamed S Ben Ammar; Mhamed S Mebazaa
Journal:  Middle East J Anaesthesiol       Date:  2010-06

3.  Hetastarch co-loading is as effective as pre-loading for the prevention of hypotension following spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery.

Authors:  B Carvalho; F J Mercier; E T Riley; C Brummel; S E Cohen
Journal:  Int J Obstet Anesth       Date:  2009-02-14       Impact factor: 2.603

4.  Effect of intravenous fluid preload on vasoactive peptide secretion during Caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia.

Authors:  A M Pouta; J Karinen; O J Vuolteenaho; T J Laatikainen
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 6.955

5.  Influence of volume preloading on uteroplacental and fetal circulation during spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section in uncomplicated singleton pregnancies.

Authors:  Sevgi Tercanli; Markus Schneider; Eva Visca; Irene Hösli; Carolyn Troeger; Regina Peukert; Wolfgang Holzgreve
Journal:  Fetal Diagn Ther       Date:  2002 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.587

6.  Colloid vs. crystalloid preloading to prevent maternal hypotension during spinal anesthesia for elective cesarean section.

Authors:  G Dahlgren; F Granath; K Pregner; P G Rösblad; H Wessel; L Irestedt
Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.105

7.  Colloid preload versus coload for spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery: the effects on maternal cardiac output.

Authors:  Wendy H L Teoh; Alex T H Sia
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 5.108

8.  A randomized trial comparing colloid preload to coload during spinal anesthesia for elective cesarean delivery.

Authors:  Sahar M Siddik-Sayyid; Viviane G Nasr; Samar K Taha; Reine A Zbeide; Jules-Marie A Shehade; Ashir A Al Alami; Farah H Mokadem; Faraj W Abdallah; Anis S Baraka; Marie T Aouad
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2009-07-29       Impact factor: 5.108

9.  Preload or coload for spinal anesthesia for elective Cesarean delivery: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Arnab Banerjee; Renato M Stocche; Pamela Angle; Stephen H Halpern
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  2009-10-27       Impact factor: 5.063

10.  The effects of intravenous ephedrine during spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Iclal Ozdemir Kol; Kenan Kaygusuz; Sinan Gursoy; Ali Cetin; Zeki Kahramanoglu; Fikret Ozkan; Caner Mimaroglu
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2009-09-23       Impact factor: 2.153

View more
  6 in total

1.  Hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 versus crystalloid co-loading during general anesthesia induction: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Takashi Juri; Koichi Suehiro; Shigemune Kuwata; Sayaka Tsujimoto; Akira Mukai; Katsuaki Tanaka; Tokuhiro Yamada; Takashi Mori; Kiyonobu Nishikawa
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2017-10-25       Impact factor: 2.078

2.  Techniques for preventing hypotension during spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section.

Authors:  Cheryl Chooi; Julia J Cox; Richard S Lumb; Philippa Middleton; Mark Chemali; Richard S Emmett; Scott W Simmons; Allan M Cyna
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-07-01

3.  Effect of Glucose Containing Crystalloid Infusion on Maternal Hemodynamic Status After Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Section.

Authors:  Simin Atashkhoei; Reyhaneh Abri; Bahman Naghipour; Pouya Hatami Marandi; Mohammad Taher Fazeli Danesh
Journal:  Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2018-08-25

4.  Colloid preloading versus crystalloid preloading to prevent hypotension after spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yuchao Shang; Huafeng Li; Junmei Ma; Ling Tan; Shuying Li; Ping Li; Bo Sheng; Rurong Wang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-02-19       Impact factor: 1.817

5.  Comparative Dose-Response Study on the Infusion of Norepinephrine Combined with Crystalloid Coload versus Colloid Coload for Preventing Hypotension During Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Delivery.

Authors:  Wei-Dong Jin; Jun-Qin Mao; Jie Liu; Gang Liang; Chao Jiang; Zhi-Min Sheng
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2022-08-06       Impact factor: 4.319

6.  Fluid loading therapy to prevent spinal hypotension in women undergoing elective caesarean section: Network meta-analysis, trial sequential analysis and meta-regression.

Authors:  Koen Rijs; Frédéric J Mercier; D Nuala Lucas; Rolf Rossaint; Markus Klimek; Michael Heesen
Journal:  Eur J Anaesthesiol       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 4.183

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.