Literature DB >> 19641050

A randomized trial comparing colloid preload to coload during spinal anesthesia for elective cesarean delivery.

Sahar M Siddik-Sayyid1, Viviane G Nasr, Samar K Taha, Reine A Zbeide, Jules-Marie A Shehade, Ashir A Al Alami, Farah H Mokadem, Faraj W Abdallah, Anis S Baraka, Marie T Aouad.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Hypotension after spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery is common. Previous studies have demonstrated that a crystalloid fluid "coload" (rapid administration of a fluid bolus starting at the time of intrathecal injection) is superior to the conventional crystalloid preload (fluid administered before the intrathecal injection) for preventing hypotension. Colloid preload provides a sustained increase in central blood volume. We hypothesized that, in contrast to crystalloid, a colloid preload may be more effective than colloid coload for reducing the incidence of spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension.
METHODS: In this double-blind study, 178 patients were randomly assigned to receive a preload of 500 mL of hydroxyethyl starch over a period of 15-20 min before initiation of spinal anesthesia (n = 90) or an identical fluid bolus of hydroxyethyl starch starting at the time of identification of cerebrospinal fluid (n = 88). Vasopressors (ephedrine or phenylephrine) were administered if systolic arterial blood pressure decreased less than 80% of the baseline pressure and <100 mm Hg, or with smaller decreases in blood pressure if accompanied by nausea, vomiting, or dizziness. The primary outcome was the incidence of hypotension (defined as the administration of at least one dose of vasopressor).
RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the groups in the incidence of hypotension (68% in preload group and 75% in coload group, 95% confidence interval of difference -6%-20%; P = 0.28), doses of ephedrine and phenylephrine, and number of vasopressor unit doses. The incidence of severe hypotension (systolic blood pressure <80 mm Hg) was 16% in the preload group and 22% in the coload group (P = 0.30). There were no differences in the incidence of nausea and/or vomiting, or neonatal outcome between the groups.
CONCLUSION: There was no difference in the incidence of hypotension in women who received colloid administration before the initiation of spinal anesthesia compared with at the time of initiation of anesthesia. Both modalities are inefficient as single interventions to prevent hypotension.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19641050     DOI: 10.1213/ane.0b013e3181b2bd6b

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  14 in total

1.  The Effect of Ringer versus Haemaccel Preload on Incidence of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting.

Authors:  Mansour Ghafourifard; Mohammad Zirak; Mohammad Hossein Broojerdi; Ali Bayendor; Abolfaz Moradi
Journal:  J Caring Sci       Date:  2015-06-01

2.  Blood volume determination in obese and normal-weight gravidas: the hydroxyethyl starch method.

Authors:  Laura K Vricella; Judette M Louis; Edward Chien; Brian M Mercer
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-05-14       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Fluid Administration Before Caesarean Delivery: Does Type and Timing Matter?

Authors:  Poonam Arora; Rupinder M Singh; Sandeep Kundra; Parshotam Lal Gautam
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2015-06-01

4.  Comparison of hemodynamic changes between phenylephrine and combined phenylephrine and glycopyrrolate groups after spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery.

Authors:  Hea-Jo Yoon; Hong-Jei Cho; In Ho Lee; Young Seok Jee; Soo Mi Kim
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2012-01-25

5.  Techniques for preventing hypotension during spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section.

Authors:  Cheryl Chooi; Julia J Cox; Richard S Lumb; Philippa Middleton; Mark Chemali; Richard S Emmett; Scott W Simmons; Allan M Cyna
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-07-01

6.  Influence of the timing of administration of crystalloid on maternal hypotension during spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery: preload versus coload.

Authors:  Ah-Young Oh; Jung-Won Hwang; In-Ae Song; Mi-Hyun Kim; Jung-Hee Ryu; Hee-Pyoung Park; Yeong-Tae Jeon; Sang-Hwan Do
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2014-05-16       Impact factor: 2.217

Review 7.  Co-loading or pre-loading for prevention of hypotension after spinal anaesthesia! a therapeutic dilemma.

Authors:  Sukhminder Jit Singh Bajwa; Ashish Kulshrestha; Ravi Jindal
Journal:  Anesth Essays Res       Date:  2013 May-Aug

8.  Comparison of colloid preload versus coload under low dose spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery.

Authors:  Rohit Varshney; Gaurav Jain
Journal:  Anesth Essays Res       Date:  2013 Sep-Dec

9.  Crystalloid and colloid preload for maintaining cardiac output in elderly patients undergoing total hip replacement under spinal anesthesia.

Authors:  Rufeng Xie; Lizhong Wang; Hongguang Bao
Journal:  J Biomed Res       Date:  2011-05

10.  Colloid cohydration and variable rate phenylephrine infusion effectively prevents postspinal hypotension in elective Cesarean deliveries.

Authors:  Indu Sen; Rozeeta Hirachan; Neerja Bhardwaj; Kajal Jain; Vanita Suri; Praveen Kumar
Journal:  J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2013-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.