Literature DB >> 26264178

Comparison of Alignment Correction Angles Between Fixed-Bearing and Mobile-Bearing UKA.

Atsuo Inoue1, Yuji Arai2, Shuji Nakagawa2, Hiroaki Inoue2, Shoichi Yamazoe1, Toshikazu Kubo2.   

Abstract

Good outcomes have been reported with both fixed-bearing and mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). However, overcorrected alignment could induce the progression of arthritis on the non-arthroplasty side. Changes of limb alignment after UKA with both types of bearings (fixed bearing: 24 knees, mobile bearing: 28 knees) were investigated. The mean difference between the preoperative standing femoral-tibial angle (FTA) and postoperative standing FTA was significantly larger in mobile bearing UKA group. In fixed-bearing UKA, there must be some laxity in MCL tension so that a 2-mm tension gauge can be inserted. In mobile-bearing UKA, appropriate MCL tension is needed to prevent bearing dislocation. This difference in MCL tension may have caused the difference in the correction angle between the groups.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MCL tension; femoral-tibial angle; fixed-bearing; mechanical axis; mobile-bearing; unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26264178     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2015.07.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  6 in total

Review 1.  [Recommendations for unicondylar knee replacement in the course of time : A current inventory].

Authors:  J Beckmann; M T Hirschmann; G Matziolis; J Holz; R V Eisenhart-Rothe; C Becher
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 2.  Mobile Bearing versus Fixed Bearing for Unicompartmental Arthroplasty in Monocompartmental Osteoarthritis of the Knee: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Filippo Migliorini; Nicola Maffulli; Francesco Cuozzo; Karen Elsner; Frank Hildebrand; Jörg Eschweiler; Arne Driessen
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-05-17       Impact factor: 4.964

3.  Assessment of radiolucent lines in patients with lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty and the relationship between these lines and the outcome.

Authors:  Long Xue; Huaming Xue; Tao Wen; Mengying Guan; Tao Yang; Tong Ma; Yihui Tu
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2021-06-26       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Arthroscopy combined with unicondylar knee arthroplasty for treatment of isolated unicompartmental knee arthritis: A long-term comparison.

Authors:  Hao-Ran Wang; Zhong-Li Li; Ji Li; Yu-Xing Wang; Zhi-Dong Zhao; Wei Li
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2019-12-26       Impact factor: 1.337

5.  Effects of a 1-mm difference in bearing thickness on intraoperative bearing movement and kinematics in Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Kohei Kawaguchi; Hiroshi Inui; Shuji Taketomi; Ryota Yamagami; Kenichi Kono; Shin Sameshima; Tomofumi Kage; Sakae Tanaka
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-04-09       Impact factor: 2.362

6.  Fixed- versus mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Wenchao Zhang; Jianpeng Wang; Hui Li; Wanchun Wang; Daniel M George; Tianlong Huang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-11-05       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.