| Literature DB >> 26264178 |
Atsuo Inoue1, Yuji Arai2, Shuji Nakagawa2, Hiroaki Inoue2, Shoichi Yamazoe1, Toshikazu Kubo2.
Abstract
Good outcomes have been reported with both fixed-bearing and mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). However, overcorrected alignment could induce the progression of arthritis on the non-arthroplasty side. Changes of limb alignment after UKA with both types of bearings (fixed bearing: 24 knees, mobile bearing: 28 knees) were investigated. The mean difference between the preoperative standing femoral-tibial angle (FTA) and postoperative standing FTA was significantly larger in mobile bearing UKA group. In fixed-bearing UKA, there must be some laxity in MCL tension so that a 2-mm tension gauge can be inserted. In mobile-bearing UKA, appropriate MCL tension is needed to prevent bearing dislocation. This difference in MCL tension may have caused the difference in the correction angle between the groups.Entities:
Keywords: MCL tension; femoral-tibial angle; fixed-bearing; mechanical axis; mobile-bearing; unicompartmental knee arthroplasty
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26264178 DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2015.07.024
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Arthroplasty ISSN: 0883-5403 Impact factor: 4.757