Literature DB >> 26263874

Surgeon-performed ultrasound: accurate, reproducible, and more efficient.

Deidre L Wyrick1, Samuel D Smith2, Jeffrey M Burford2, Melvin S Dassinger2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: A study previously performed at our institution demonstrated that surgeon-performed ultrasound (SPUS) was accurate compared to radiology department ultrasound (RDUS) when evaluating children with suspected appendicitis. The purpose of this study was to determine if these results were reproducible and if SPUS decreased time to definitive diagnosis.
METHODS: A surgery resident performed examinations and ultrasounds on children with suspected appendicitis. Final diagnosis was confirmed by pathology. Results were compared to RDUS and combined with the previous study for a final comparison with RDUS. Mean time to diagnosis was recorded. Data were analyzed using Fisher exact and Student's t test.
RESULTS: Fifty-eight patients underwent SPUS, of these 35 had RDUS. The accuracy of SPUS alone was 93% (54/58) and RDUS accuracy was 94% (33/35) (p = 1). When SPUS was combined with clinical examination accuracy increased to 95% (55/58). When results were combined with the previous study, overall accuracy of SPUS was 90% (101/112) compared to overall RDUS accuracy of 89 % (50/56). Mean time to diagnosis for RDUS was 135 min (n = 35), whereas mean time to diagnosis for SPUS was 30 min (n = 58; p = 0.0001).
CONCLUSION: SPUS is accurate and reproducible in evaluating children with suspected appendicitis. SPUS potentially decreases time to definitive therapy and emergency department wait times.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Appendicitis; SPUS; Surgeon-performed ultrasound; Ultrasound

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26263874     DOI: 10.1007/s00383-015-3758-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int        ISSN: 0179-0358            Impact factor:   1.827


  10 in total

Review 1.  The optimal initial management of children with suspected appendicitis: a decision analysis.

Authors:  Benjamin A Hagendorf; John R Clarke; Randall S Burd
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.545

Review 2.  When appendicitis is suspected in children.

Authors:  C J Sivit; M J Siegel; K E Applegate; K D Newman
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2001 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.333

3.  Surgeon-performed ultrasound as a diagnostic tool in appendicitis.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Burford; Melvin S Dassinger; Samuel D Smith
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 2.545

4.  Effect of computed tomography of the appendix on treatment of patients and use of hospital resources.

Authors:  P M Rao; J T Rhea; R A Novelline; A A Mostafavi; C J McCabe
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1998-01-15       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 5.  Imaging acute appendicitis.

Authors:  Michele A Brown
Journal:  Semin Ultrasound CT MR       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 1.875

6.  Ultrasound as a diagnostic tool used by surgeons in pyloric stenosis.

Authors:  Cristiano Boneti; Marcene R McVay; Evan R Kokoska; Richard J Jackson; Samuel D Smith
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 2.545

7.  Acute appendicitis: US evaluation using graded compression.

Authors:  J B Puylaert
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Surgeon-performed ultrasound for diagnosis of pyloric stenosis is accurate, reproducible, and clinically valuable.

Authors:  Marcene R McVay; Daniel R Copeland; Lisa E McMahon; Graham H Cosper; Theresa G McCallie; Evan R Kokoska; Richard J Jackson; Samuel D Smith
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 2.545

Review 9.  Surgeon-performed ultrasound: its use in clinical practice.

Authors:  G S Rozycki
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Return of the surgeon in the diagnosis of pyloric stenosis.

Authors:  Daniel R Copeland; Graham H Cosper; Lisa E McMahon; Cristiano Boneti; Danny C Little; Melvin S Dassinger; Evan R Kokoska; Richard J Jackson; Samuel D Smith
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 2.545

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.