| Literature DB >> 26262604 |
Mejdi Snoussi1, Emira Noumi2, Najla Trabelsi3, Guido Flamini4, Adele Papetti5, Vincenzo De Feo6.
Abstract
Chemical composition, antioxidant and anti-Vibrio spp. activities of the essential oil isolated from the aerial parts of Mentha spicata L. (spearmint) are investigated in the present study. The effect of the essential oil on Vibrio spp. biofilm inhibition and eradication was tested using the XTT assay. A total of 63 chemical constituents were identified in spearmint oil using GC/MS, constituting 99.9% of the total identified compounds. The main components were carvone (40.8% ± 1.23%) and limonene (20.8% ± 1.12%). The antimicrobial activity against 30 Vibrio spp. strains (16 species) was evaluated by disc diffusion and microdilution assays. All microorganisms were strongly affected, indicating an appreciable antimicrobial potential of the oil. Moreover, the investigated oil exhibited high antioxidant potency, as assessed by four different tests in comparison with BHT. The ability of the oil, belonging to the carvone chemotype, to inhibit or reduce Vibrio spp. biofilm warrants further investigation to explore the use of natural products in antibiofilm adhesion and reinforce the possibility of its use in the pharmaceutical or food industry as a natural antibiotic and seafood preservative against Vibrio contamination.Entities:
Keywords: Mentha spicata; anti-Vibrio activity; antioxidant activity; chemical composition
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26262604 PMCID: PMC6332415 DOI: 10.3390/molecules200814402
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Chemical composition of Tunisian M. spicata essential oil.
| Components | I.r.i. a | Percent |
|---|---|---|
| α-pinene | 941 | 1.4 ± 0.17 |
| camphene | 955 | 0.2 ± 0.06 |
| sabinene | 977 | 1.4 ± 0.06 |
| β-pinene | 982 | 2.2 ± 0.25 |
| myrcene | 993 | 1.1 ± 0.15 |
| 3-octanol | 994 | 1.0 ± 0.21 |
| 1028 | 0.8 ± 0.06 | |
| limonene | 1032 | 20.8 ± 1.12 |
| 1,8-cineole | 1034 | 17.0 ± 0.60 |
| 1042 | 0.2 ± 0.06 | |
| 1070 | 1.6 ± 0.15 | |
| linalool | 1101 | 0.4 ± 0.12 |
| 1123 | 0.1 ± 0.00 | |
| 1138 | 0.1 ± 0.06 | |
| 1141 | 0.1 ± 0.00 | |
| borneol | 1171 | 0.1 ± 0.06 |
| δ-terpineol | 1172 | 0.4 ± 0.12 |
| 4-terpineol | 1179 | 1.3 ± 0.26 |
| α-terpineol | 1191 | 0.5 ± 0.10 |
| dihydrocarveol | 1194 | 1.7 ± 0.31 |
| 1195 | 1.9 ± 0.49 | |
| 1219 | 0.4 ± 0.06 | |
| 1231 | 0.6 ± 0.15 | |
| pulegone | 1239 | 0.3 ± 0.06 |
| carvone | 1244 | 40.8 ± 1.23 |
| isobornyl acetate | 1287 | 0.1 ± 0.00 |
| 1327 | 0.2 ± 0.06 | |
| β-bourbonene | 1385 | 0.9 ± 0.17 |
| β-elemene | 1392 | 0.3 ± 0.06 |
| β-caryophyllene | 1419 | 1.2 ± 0.25 |
| germacrene D | 1481 | 0.2 ± 0.06 |
| germacrene A | 1506 | 0.2 ± 0.15 |
| spathulenol | 1578 | 0.1 ± 0.00 |
| caryophyllene oxide | 1582 | 0.3 ± 0.06 |
| monoterpene hydrocarbons | 45.1 | |
| oxygenated monoterpenes | 50.6 | |
| sesquiterpene hydrocarbons | 2.8 | |
| oxygenated sesquiterpenes | 0.4 | |
| others | 1.0 | |
| total identified | 99.9 |
a l.r.i.: Linear Retention Index.
Antioxidant activity of M. spicata essential oil.
| Activity (µg/mL) | Spearmint Oil | BHT | BHA | Ascorbic Acid | EDTA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DPPH IC50 | 3.08 ± 0.07 | 11.48 ± 0.02 | - | - | - |
| Reducing Power EC50 | 2.49 ± 0.07 | - | - | 37.53 ± 0.39 | - |
| Chelating Power IC50 | 6.33 ± 0.12 | - | - | - | 32 ± 0 |
| β-Carotenes IC50 | 6.4 ± 0.07 | - | 48.00 ± 0.50 | - | - |
Growth inhibition zone (IZ, mm), MIC, MBC for M. spicata essential oil.
| Microorganisms | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| GIZ ± SD | MIC | MBC | |
| 13.67 ± 0.58 f,g | 0.023 | 12 | |
| 14.67 ± 0.58 f | 0.023 | 12 | |
| 13.33 ± 0.58 g | 0.023 | 6 | |
| 14.67 ± 0.58 e,f | 0.047 | 6 | |
| 13.67 ± 0.58 f,g | 0.023 | 6 | |
| 14.67 ± 0.58 e,f | 0.023 | 12 | |
| 15.67 ± 0.58 d | 0.023 | 12 | |
| 17.33 ± 0.58 c | 0.023 | 12 | |
| 19.33 ± 0.58 b | 0.047 | 6 | |
| 14.33 ± 0.58 f,g | 0.047 | 3 | |
| 10 ± 0 i | 0.047 | 12 | |
| 11.67 ± 0.58 h | 0.023 | 12 | |
| 18.67 ± 0.58 b | 0.023 | 24 | |
| 7 ± 0 j | 0.047 | 12 | |
| 21.33 ± 0.58 a | 0.047 | 12 | |
| 12.33 ± 0.58 h | 0.023 | 1.5 | |
| 13.67 ± 0.58 f,g | 0.023 | 0.75 | |
| 14.33 ± 0.58 f,g | 0.023 | 6 | |
| 14.33 ± 0.58 f,g | 0.047 | 6 | |
| 13.67 ± 0.58 f,g | 0.023 | 12 | |
| 14.33 ± 0.58 f,g | 0.023 | 12 | |
| 13.67 ± 0.58 f,g | 0.023 | 12 | |
| 15.67 ± 0.58 d | 0.047 | 12 | |
| 13.33 ± 0.58 g | 0.023 | 12 | |
| 13.67 ± 0.58 f,g | 0.023 | 12 | |
| 9.67 ± 0.58 i | 0.023 | 12 | |
| 13.67 ± 0.58 f,g | 0.047 | 12 | |
| 14.67 ± 0.58 e,f | 0.047 | 12 | |
| 14.57 ± 0.58 e,f | 0.023 | 12 | |
| 17.67 ± 0.58 c | 0.047 | 12 | |
| 14.67 ± 0.58 e,f | 0.023 | 12 | |
(a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j): Means followed by the same letters are not significantly different at P = 0.05 based on Duncan’s multiple range tests; GIZ ± SD: Inhibition zone around the discs impregnated with of essential oil (10 mg/disk), expressed as mean of three replicates (mm); SD: standard deviation. MIC: Minimal Inhibitory Concentration; MBC: Minimal Bactericidal Concentration expressed as (mg/mL).
Comparison between the growth inhibition zone (GIZ, mm), MIC (mg/mL) and MBC (mg/mL) obtained with Eugenia caryophyllata, Thymus vulgaris, Rosmarinus officianalis, Cuminum cyminum, M. pulegium, M. longifolia, and M. spicata essential oils against some Vibrio spp. strains.
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GIZ | 11.33 ± 0.57 | 10.66 ± 0.57 | 13.66 ± 0.57 | 12.33 ± 0.57 | 11.66 ± 0.57 | 10 ± 0 | |
| MIC | 0.15 | 0.31 | 0.156 | 0.156 | 0.156 | 0.156 | |
| MBC | 1.25 | 2.5 | >1.25 | 0.625 | 1.25 | 1.25 | |
| GIZ | 13.33 ± 0.57 | 14 ± 1 | 14.66 ± 0.57 | 22.33 ± 0.57 | 12.66 ± 0.57 | 13 ± 1 | |
| MIC | 0.078 | 0.156 | 0.156 | 0.156 | 0.156 | 0.156 | |
| MBC | 0.625 | 1.25 | 0.312 | 0.312 | 1.25 | 0.625 | |
| GIZ | - | 7 ± 0 | 9.33 ± 0.57 | 12.33 ± 0.57 | 14 ± 0 | 12 ± 1 | |
| MIC | 0.31 | 0.195 | 0.625 | 1.25 | 0.156 | 0.156 | |
| MBC | 5 | >5 | >2.5 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 2.5 | |
| GIZ | 11 ± 0 | 20.33 ± 0.58 | 15 ± 0 | 13.33 ± 0.58 | 12 ± 0 | 14.67 ± 0.58 | |
| MIC | 0.312 | 0.156 | 0.156 | 0.078 | 0.156 | 0.312 | |
| MBC | 0.625 | 0.625 | 1.25 | 0.625 | 1.25 | 1.25 | |
| GIZ | 10 ± 1 | 13.33 ± 0.57 | 9 ± 0 | 11 ± 0 | 7 ± 0 | 8 ± 0 | |
| MIC | 0.097 | 0.78 | 0.39 | 0.195 | 0.39 | 0.195 | |
| MBC | 3.125 | 6.25 | 3.125 | >1.56 | 3.125 | 3.125 | |
| GIZ | 9.33 ± 1.15 | 7.66 ± 0.57 | 8.66 ± 1.15 | 12 ± 0 | 11 ± 0 | 11 ± 0 | |
| MIC | 0.78 | 0.78 | 0.195 | 0.39 | 0.39 | 0.39 | |
| MBC | >3.125 | 6.25 | 3.125 | 1.56 | 6.25 | 6.25 | |
| GIZ | 18.67 ± 0.58 | 17.67 ± 0.58 | 14.67 ± 0.58 | 15.67 ± 0.58 | 13.33 ± 0.58 | 13.33 ± 0.58 | |
| MIC | 0.023 | 0.047 | 0.023 | 0.023 | 0.023 | 0.023 | |
| MBC | >24 | >12 | >12 | >12 | >6 | >12 | |
-: No inhibition; *: Snoussi et al., (2008); **: Hajlaoui et al., (2010); ***: This study. 1: V. alginolyticus ATCC 33787; 2: V. alginolyticus ATCC 17749; 3: V. parahaemolyticus ATCC 17802; 4: V. parahaemolyticus ATCC 43996; 5: V. vulnificus ATCC 27562; 6: V. fluvialis ATCC 33809.
Figure 1Effects of different concentrations of M. spicata essential oil on biofilm formation (expressed as percentage of inhibition evaluated by the XTT values) of Vibrio spp. strains.Errors bars represent standard deviations. Values are the average of at least three independent determinations.
Figure 2Effects of different concentrations of M. spicata essential oil on preformed biofilm (expressed as percentage of eradication evaluated by the XTT values) of Vibrio spp. strains. Errors bars represent standard deviation. Values are the average of at least three independent determinations.