Literature DB >> 26262006

Using EHRs and Machine Learning for Heart Failure Survival Analysis.

Maryam Panahiazar1, Vahid Taslimitehrani2, Naveen Pereira3, Jyotishman Pathak1.   

Abstract

"Heart failure (HF) is a frequent health problem with high morbidity and mortality, increasing prevalence and escalating healthcare costs" [1]. By calculating a HF survival risk score based on patient-specific characteristics from Electronic Health Records (EHRs), we can identify high-risk patients and apply individualized treatment and healthy living choices to potentially reduce their mortality risk. The Seattle Heart Failure Model (SHFM) is one of the most popular models to calculate HF survival risk that uses multiple clinical variables to predict HF prognosis and also incorporates impact of HF therapy on patient outcomes. Although the SHFM has been validated across multiple cohorts [1-5], these studies were primarily done using clinical trials databases that do not reflect routine clinical care in the community. Further, the impact of contemporary therapeutic interventions, such as beta-blockers or defibrillators, was incorporated in SHFM by extrapolation from external trials. In this study, we assess the performance of SHFM using EHRs at Mayo Clinic, and sought to develop a risk prediction model using machine learning techiniques that applies routine clinical care data. Our results shows the models which were built using EHR data are more accurate (11% improvement in AUC) with the convenience of being more readily applicable in routine clinical care. Furthermore, we demonstrate that new predictive markers (such as co-morbidities) when incorporated into our models improve prognostic performance significantly (8% improvement in AUC).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26262006      PMCID: PMC4905764     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform        ISSN: 0926-9630


  8 in total

1.  Support vector machine classification and validation of cancer tissue samples using microarray expression data.

Authors:  T S Furey; N Cristianini; N Duffy; D W Bednarski; M Schummer; D Haussler
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  Validation of the Seattle Heart Failure Model (SHFM) in heart failure population.

Authors:  Sajjad Hussain; Azhar Mahmood Kayani; Rubab Munir; Irum Abid
Journal:  J Coll Physicians Surg Pak       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 0.711

3.  Influence of predictive modeling in implementing optimal heart failure therapy.

Authors:  Hari Prasad; Jaspinder Sra; Wayne C Levy; Dwight D Stapleton
Journal:  Am J Med Sci       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 2.378

Review 4.  Risk prediction models for mortality in ambulatory patients with heart failure: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ana C Alba; Thomas Agoritsas; Milosz Jankowski; Delphine Courvoisier; Stephen D Walter; Gordon H Guyatt; Heather J Ross
Journal:  Circ Heart Fail       Date:  2013-07-25       Impact factor: 8.790

5.  Prealbumin improves death risk prediction of BNP-added Seattle Heart Failure Model: results from a pilot study in elderly chronic heart failure patients.

Authors:  Aderville Cabassi; Jacques de Champlain; Umberto Maggiore; Elisabetta Parenti; Pietro Coghi; Vanni Vicini; Stefano Tedeschi; Elena Cremaschi; Simone Binno; Rossana Rocco; Salvatore Bonali; Michele Bianconcini; Clelia Guerra; Giuseppina Folesani; Alberto Montanari; Giuseppe Regolisti; Enrico Fiaccadori
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2013-04-25       Impact factor: 4.164

6.  Using methods from the data-mining and machine-learning literature for disease classification and prediction: a case study examining classification of heart failure subtypes.

Authors:  Peter C Austin; Jack V Tu; Jennifer E Ho; Daniel Levy; Douglas S Lee
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 6.437

7.  Prediction of hospitalization due to heart diseases by supervised learning methods.

Authors:  Wuyang Dai; Theodora S Brisimi; William G Adams; Theofanie Mela; Venkatesh Saligrama; Ioannis Ch Paschalidis
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 4.046

8.  The Seattle Heart Failure Model: prediction of survival in heart failure.

Authors:  Wayne C Levy; Dariush Mozaffarian; David T Linker; Santosh C Sutradhar; Stefan D Anker; Anne B Cropp; Inder Anand; Aldo Maggioni; Paul Burton; Mark D Sullivan; Bertram Pitt; Philip A Poole-Wilson; Douglas L Mann; Milton Packer
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2006-03-13       Impact factor: 29.690

  8 in total
  22 in total

Review 1.  Big data analytics to improve cardiovascular care: promise and challenges.

Authors:  John S Rumsfeld; Karen E Joynt; Thomas M Maddox
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2016-03-24       Impact factor: 32.419

2.  Predicting biomedical metadata in CEDAR: A study of Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO).

Authors:  Maryam Panahiazar; Michel Dumontier; Olivier Gevaert
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2017-06-16       Impact factor: 6.317

Review 3.  Advancing Alzheimer's research: A review of big data promises.

Authors:  Rui Zhang; Gyorgy Simon; Fang Yu
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2017-07-24       Impact factor: 4.046

4.  A machine learning-based approach for the prediction of periprocedural myocardial infarction by using routine data.

Authors:  Yao Wang; Kangjun Zhu; Ya Li; Qingbo Lv; Guosheng Fu; Wenbin Zhang
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2020-10

5.  Machine learning for optimized individual survival prediction in resectable upper gastrointestinal cancer.

Authors:  Jin-On Jung; Nerma Crnovrsanin; Naita Maren Wirsik; Henrik Nienhüser; Leila Peters; Felix Popp; André Schulze; Martin Wagner; Beat Peter Müller-Stich; Markus Wolfgang Büchler; Thomas Schmidt
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2022-05-26       Impact factor: 4.553

6.  Prediction of postoperative cardiac events in multiple surgical cohorts using a multimodal and integrative decision support system.

Authors:  Renaid B Kim; Olivia P Alge; Gang Liu; Ben E Biesterveld; Glenn Wakam; Aaron M Williams; Michael R Mathis; Kayvan Najarian; Jonathan Gryak
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-05       Impact factor: 4.996

Review 7.  Informatics Solutions for Application of Decision-Making Skills.

Authors:  Christine W Nibbelink; Janay R Young; Jane M Carrington; Barbara B Brewer
Journal:  Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am       Date:  2018-04-04       Impact factor: 1.326

8.  Intelligent Perioperative System: Towards Real-time Big Data Analytics in Surgery Risk Assessment.

Authors:  Zheng Feng; Rajendra Rana Bhat; Xiaoyong Yuan; Daniel Freeman; Tezcan Baslanti; Azra Bihorac; Xiaolin Li
Journal:  DASC PICom DataCom CyberSciTech 2017 (2017)       Date:  2017-11

9.  Developing EHR-driven heart failure risk prediction models using CPXR(Log) with the probabilistic loss function.

Authors:  Vahid Taslimitehrani; Guozhu Dong; Naveen L Pereira; Maryam Panahiazar; Jyotishman Pathak
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 6.317

Review 10.  Natural Language Processing for EHR-Based Computational Phenotyping.

Authors:  Zexian Zeng; Yu Deng; Xiaoyu Li; Tristan Naumann; Yuan Luo
Journal:  IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform       Date:  2018-06-25       Impact factor: 3.710

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.