Literature DB >> 26260333

Identification and complete genome analysis of a novel bovine picornavirus in Japan.

Makoto Nagai1, Tsutomu Omatsu2, Hiroshi Aoki3, Yoshihiro Kaku4, Graham J Belsham5, Kei Haga6, Yuki Naoi2, Kaori Sano2, Moeko Umetsu3, Mai Shiokawa3, Shinobu Tsuchiaka2, Tetsuya Furuya7, Sachiko Okazaki2, Yukie Katayama2, Mami Oba2, Junsuke Shirai7, Kazuhiko Katayama6, Tetsuya Mizutani2.   

Abstract

We identified novel viruses in feces from cattle with diarrhea collected in 2009 in Hokkaido Prefecture, Japan, by using a metagenomics approach and determined the (near) complete sequences of the virus. Sequence analyses revealed that they had a standard picornavirus genome organization, i.e. 5' untranslated region (UTR) - L- P1 (VP4- VP3- VP2- VP1) - P2 (2A- 2B- 2C) - P3 (3A- 3B- 3C-3D) - 3'UTR- poly(A). They are closely related to other unclassified Chinese picornaviruses; bat picornaviruses group 1-3, feline picornavirus, and canine picornavirus, sharing 45.4-51.4% (P1), 38.0-44.9% (P2), and 49.6-53.3% (P3) amino acid identities, respectively. The phylogenetic analyses and detailed genome characterization showed that they, together with the unclassified Chinese picornaviruses, grouped as a cluster for the P1, 2C, 3CD and VP1 coding regions. These viruses had conserved features (e.g. predicted protein cleavage sites, presence of a leader protein, 2A, 2C, 3C, and 3D functional domains), suggesting they have a common ancestor. Reverse-transcription-PCR assays, using specific primers designed from the 5'UTR sequence of these viruses, showed that 23.0% (20/87) of fecal samples from cattle with diarrhea were positive, indicating the prevalence of these picornavirus in the Japanese cattle population in Hokkaido Prefecture. However, further studies are needed to investigate the pathogenic potential and etiological role of these viruses in cattle.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bovine; Feces; Japan; Metagenomics; Novel picornavirus

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26260333      PMCID: PMC7114519          DOI: 10.1016/j.virusres.2015.08.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Virus Res        ISSN: 0168-1702            Impact factor:   3.303


Introduction

Viruses in the family Picornaviridae are small, icosahedral and nonenveloped, with a polyadenylated, single-stranded, positive-sense RNA genome and these viruses are currently divided into 29 officially recognized genera: Aphthovirus, Aquamavirus, Avihepatovirus, Avisivirus, Cardiovirus, Cosavirus, Dicipivirus, Enterovirus, Erbovirus, Gallivirus, Hepatovirus, Hunnivirus, Kobuvirus, Kunsagivirus, Megrivirus, Mischivirus, Mosavirus, Oscivirus, Parechovirus, Pasivirus, Passerivirus, Rosavirus, Sakobuvirus, Salivirus, Sapelovirus, Senecavirus, Sicinivirus, Teschovirus and Tremovirus (Knowles et al., 2012, Adams et al., 2013) plus several candidate genera. Recently, a number of novel picornaviruses were discovered from different hosts (Boros et al., 2012, Pankovics et al., 2012, Reuter et al., 2012, Sauvage et al., 2012, Boros et al., 2013, Liao et al., 2014) and the list of picornaviruses is rapidly expanding (http://www.picornaviridae.com). In the Asia-Pacific region, several new picornaviruses, including three bat picornaviruses, one feline picornavirus, and one canine picornavirus were discovered in Hong Kong (Lau et al., 2011, Lau et al., 2012, Woo et al., 2012). However, their clinical relevance remains to be elucidated. Picornaviruses can cause various symptoms including diarrhea and they are widely distributed in animals (Whitton et al., 2005). In the course of surveillance for unexplained bovine diarrhea, using a metagenomics approach, we identified some novel picornaviruses. The present study describes the identification of these new picornaviruses (termed bovine Japanese picornaviruses) from fecal samples of calves with diarrhea in Hokkaido Prefecture, Japan and the genomic characterization of these viruses.

Material and methods

Sample collection of bovine feces and preparation

Forty fecal samples obtained from cattle with diarrhea in Hokkaido Prefecture in 2009 were analyzed using deep sequencing. The most common bovine viral pathogens inducing diarrhea, including group A, B, and C rotaviruses, bovine torovirus, and bovine coronavirus had been ruled out as the cause of the diarrhea by using reverse transcription (RT)-PCR diagnostic assays (20%; 10 of 50 samples). Samples were collected directly from the rectums to prevent contamination from the environment or between samples. Fecal samples were diluted 1:9 (w/v) in sterile phosphate-buffered saline with 1% antibiotics, and centrifuged at 10,000 ×  g for 10 min followed by filtration through a 0.22 μm filter. The filtrates were stored at −80 °C until used for genomic analysis and virus isolation.

Viral RNA extraction, cDNA library construction, and deep sequencing

Viral RNAs were extracted from the filtrates using TRIzol® LS Reagent (Life technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and treated with DNase I (Takara Bio, Shiga, Japan). cDNA libraries for deep sequencing were constructed from RNA using the NEBNext Ultra Directional RNA Library Prep Kit for Illumina (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s guidelines. Whole genome sequencing was determined by deep sequencing and the rapid amplification cDNA end method (RACE) (Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Mannheim, Germany) and 5′-Full RACE Core Set (Takara Bio). After assessing the library quality and quantity on a Bioanalyzer® and Qubit® 2.0 Fluorimeter (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA), deep sequencing was conducted by using a MiSeq bench-top sequencer (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) using 51 nucleotide (nt) single reads. The runs were performed three times. Sequence data analysis was performed using the MiSeq Reporter v1 (Illumina) to generate FASTQ formatted sequence data. Trimmed reads were assembled into contigs using de novo assembly in CLC Genomics Workbench 6.0 (CLC bio, Aarhus, Denmark).

Genome analysis

Viral sequence searches for assembled contigs were performed with the BLAST program in the National Center for Biotechnology Information non-redundant nucleotide database. Nucleotide sequences were aligned using ClustalW (Thompson et al., 1997), and phylogenetic analysis was performed by the maximum likelihood method using MEGA5.22 (Tamura et al., 2011). The trees were statistically supported by bootstrapping with 1000 replicates (Felsenstein, 1985). Sequence similarity calculations were performed by using CLC Genomics Workbench 6.0 (CLC bio). Hypothetical polyprotein cleavage sites in the picornavirus were predicted using the NetPicoRNA program (Blom et al., 1996). Secondary structure elements within the 5′UTR were predicted using Mfold (Zuker, 2003).

RT-PCR for 5′UTR

RT-PCR was performed with PrimeScript™ One Step RT-PCR Kit Ver.2 (TaKaRa Bio) using RNA extracted from fecal samples. The primers F (5′- CTT TTT CCC CCT CTT GYA AC -3′) and R (5′- TTA GCC GCA TTC AGG GKC CTG GAG -3′) were designed using the nucleotide sequence from the 5′UTR of the bovine Japanese picornaviruses. The production and amplification of the cDNA fragment was achieved under the following conditions: 50 °C for 30 min and 94 °C for 2 min, followed by 40 cycles of 94 °C for 30 s, 55 °C for 30 s, and 72 °C for 1 min, and a final extension at 72 °C for 5 min. The RT-PCR products were electrophoresed on a 2% agarose gel and purified.

Accession numbers of Japanese bovine picornavirus nucleotide sequences

The nucleotide sequences of the bovine Japanese picornavirus (Bo-11-39/2009/JPN; Bo-11-39, Bo-12-3/2009/JPN; Bo-12-3, Bo-12-7/2009/JPN; Bo-12-7, Bo-12-11/2009/JPN; Bo-12-11, Bo-12-38/2009/JPN; Bo-12-38) were deposited in the DNA Data Bank of Japan, the DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank, under accession numbers LC006971 and LC036579 to LC036582.

Results

Identification of novel picornaviruses by deep sequencing

In the course of surveillance for unexplained bovine diarrhea using a metagenomics approach, we found 18 large sequence contigs that had a length of approximately 6000–8000 nucleotides (nt) from 14 samples. Ten, two and one sequence contigs showed high sequence homology to published bovine kobuvirus, bovine astrovirus and enterovirus F genomes respectively using nucleotide BLAST searches. Five of 18 sequence contigs, that had a length of approximately 7500 nt, were derived from five calves with diarrhea kept on five dairy farms and exhibited similarity to nucleotide sequences of other unclassified picornavirus genomes. Three of the five samples had more than two contigs (two samples: unclassified picornavirus and bovine kobuvirus, one sample; unclassified picornavirus, bovine kobuvirus and bovine astrovirus). Since the nucleotide sequence homology of the five contigs to other picornavirus genomes was rather low (<50%), we performed further analyses of these five contigs which were termed Bo-11-39, Bo-12-3, Bo-12-7, Bo-12-11, and Bo-12-38.

Genome characterization of the bovine Japanese picornavirus

The complete genome length of Bo-11-39 was 7570 nt with G + C content of 0.41, excluding the poly(A) tail. We determined nearly complete genome sequences (including the complete open reading frames) of Bo-12-3, Bo-12-7, Bo-12-11 and Bo-12-38 but could not completely determine the sequence due to insufficient amount of samples. The genome organization of each is similar to that of other picornaviruses. They include a single large open reading frame (ORF) containing 6915 nt (Bo-11-38), or 7023 nt (Bo-12-3, 7, 11 and 38), which encodes a polyprotein precursor of 2305 amino acids (aa) (Bo-11-39), or 2341 aa (Bo-12-3, 7, 11 and 38), flanked by the 5'UTR and the 3'UTR with a poly(A) tail. Cleavage sites within the polyprotein were predicted by NetPicoRNA analysis and alignments with other picornaviruses. The junction sites appeared to be mainly Gln(Q)/Gly(G), except for predicted cleavage sites of the L/VP4 (Arg(R)/Gly(G), Bo-11-38 and Thr(T)/Gly(G), Bo-12-3, 7, 11 and 38), VP4/VP2 (Lys(K)/Ser(S)), and VP1/2A (Asp(D)/ Gly(G), Bo-12-3, 7, 11 and 38), respectively (Fig. 1 ). The coding region consists of a leader protein (L), a structural protein region P1 (833 aa), and the non-structural protein regions P2 (645 aa in Bo-11-39 and 654 aa in Bo-12-3, 7, 11 and 38), and P3 (768 aa in Bo-11-39 and 793 aa in Bo-12-3, 7, 11 and 38). Pair-wise alignment of the amino acid sequences of Bo-11-39 and Bo-12-3, 7, 11 and 38 with those of other picornaviruses revealed that they shared higher sequence identities with bovine enterovirus 1 (P1: 36.1% and 34.8%; P2: 30.0% and 29.0%; P3: 43.2% and 42.0%) and porcine sapelovirus 1 (P1: 38.9% and 39.5%; P2: 30.5% and 28.0%; P3: 45.9% and 44.0%) than with other representative viruses from the recognized genera within the Picornaviridae. However, the highest sequence identities were found with unclassified Chinese picornaviruses; bat picornavirus group 1–3 (P1: 45.4–48.4%; P2: 40.0–42.5%; P3: 49.6–55.2%), feline picornavirus (P1: 49.3–51.4%; P2: 41.4–44.9%; P3: 51.5–52.3 %), and canine picornavirus (P1: 48.8–50.3%; P2: 38.0–40.7%; P3: 53.3%) (Table 1 ). These viruses are clearly very different from all previously described picornaviruses.
Fig. 1

Genome organization of Bo-11-39/2009/JPN (A) and Bo-12-3, 7, 11 and 38/2009/JPN (B) with predicted cleavage sites and conserved picornavirus motifs. The ORF is flanked by the 5′-UTR and the 3′-UTR with a poly(A) tail. P1 (VP4, VP2, VP3, and VP1) includes the virus capsid proteins, while P2 (2A, 2B, and 2C) and P3 (3A, 3B, 3C, and 3D) are nonstructural proteins. Nucleotide lengths (upper) and amino acid lengths (lower) are shown for each portion of the polyprotein coding region. The positions of the amino acid motifs are indicated with the first position of the motif.

Table 1

Genome features and pairwise amino acid identity (%) comparisons of bovine Japanese picornavirus to other picornaviruses.

PicornavirusVirusDDBJ/EMBL/GenBankGenomic featurePairwise amino acid identity (%)
Pairwise amino acid identity (%)
Bo-11-39/2009/JPN
Bo-12-3, 7, 11 and 38/2009/JPN
GenusAccession no.Size (nt)G + C contentP1P2P3P1P2P3
AphthovirusFoot-and-mouth disease virusAF30815781190.5518.216.118.919.216.319.1
AquamavirusAquamavirus AEU14204066930.448.99.816.49.79.917.5
AvihepatovirusDuck hepatitis virus 1DQ22654176900.438.78.717.99.39.016.0
AvisivirusAvisivirus AKC46595475320.458.29.415.99.18.615.4
CardiovirusEncephalomyocarditis virus 1M8186178350.4918.413.919.120.714.819.1
CosavirusCosavirus AFJ43890276320.4417.514.321.619.314.820.0
DicipivirusCadicivirus AJN81920287550.4217.412.420.716.311.921.8
EnterovirusBovine enterovirus 1D0021474140.4936.130.043.234.829.042.0
ErbovirusEquine rhinitis B virus 2X9687188280.4918.713.719.319.914.621.3
GallivirusGallivirus AJQ69161384960.4811.411.520.812.412.422.0
HepatovirusHepatitis A virus 1M1470774780.3811.58.917.412.810.017.6
HunnivirusHunnivirus AJQ94188075830.4619.915.122.220.914.922.5
KobuvirusBovine kobuvirus U-1AB08478883740.5415.011.721.815.611.921.7
MegrivirusTurkey hepatitis virus 1HM75119990750.4614.412.420.514.512.721.1
MischivirusMischivirus AJQ81485184570.4818.014.920.818.615.019.8
MosavirusMosavirus A2KF95846183980.4519.715.120.721.216.321.2
OscivirusOscivirus AGU18240876250.4716.212.020.917.011.322.4
ParechovirusHuman parechovirus 2AJ00569573480.3910.011.316.410.710.517.9
PasivirusSwine pasivirus 1JQ3164706,8960.4310.310.716.410.310.716.9
PasserivirusPasserivirus A1GU18240680190.5814.911.722.215.912.322.5
RosavirusRosavirus M-7JF97368687240.5217.411.520.816.612.322.9
SalivirusSalivirus 1GQ17964079820.5616.311.719.516.812.021.1
SapelovirusPorcine sapelovirus 1AF40681374910.4138.930.545.939.528.044.0
SenecavirusSeneca vally virus 1DQ64125773100.5119.014.920.319.713.319.0
TeschovirusPorcine teschovirus 1AJ01138071170.4519.315.623.119.013.623.7
TremovirusAvian encephalomyelitis virus 1AJ22517370550.4511.68.319.112.49.719.2
UnclassifiedBat picornavirus group 1HQ59534077370.4548.241.255.247.340.851.0
UnclassifiedBat picornavirus group 2HQ59534276770.4345.940.054.945.440.551.0
UnclassifiedBat picornavirus group 3HQ59534477490.5048.440.353.347.742.549.6
UnclassifiedFeline picornavirusJN57211774150.5051.441.151.549.344.952.3
UnclassifiedCanine picornavirusJN83135679480.4150.338.053.348.840.753.3
Bo-11-39/2009/JPNLC00697175700.4154.948.155.9
Bo-12-3/2009/JPNLC0365797610 (incomplete)0.4154.948.155.9
Genome organization of Bo-11-39/2009/JPN (A) and Bo-12-3, 7, 11 and 38/2009/JPN (B) with predicted cleavage sites and conserved picornavirus motifs. The ORF is flanked by the 5′-UTR and the 3′-UTR with a poly(A) tail. P1 (VP4, VP2, VP3, and VP1) includes the virus capsid proteins, while P2 (2A, 2B, and 2C) and P3 (3A, 3B, 3C, and 3D) are nonstructural proteins. Nucleotide lengths (upper) and amino acid lengths (lower) are shown for each portion of the polyprotein coding region. The positions of the amino acid motifs are indicated with the first position of the motif. Genome features and pairwise amino acid identity (%) comparisons of bovine Japanese picornavirus to other picornaviruses.

Analyses of the 5′UTR and 3′UTR

The complete 5'UTR of Bo-11-39 and near complete 5′UTR of Bo-12-3, 7, 11 and 38 had 38.5–41.7% and 38.5–41.9% identities to those of bat picornavirus group 3 and canine picornavirus, which have a type I internal ribosomal entry site (IRES). In contrast, the only 20.1–24.2% nt identities were found with the bat picornavirus group 1 and 2, and feline picornavirus sequences, which have type IV IRES elements (Table 2 ). Within the picornavirus family it is now known that there are four classes of IRES element which vary in size and properties (Belsham, 2009). Secondary structure prediction of the 5′-UTR of Bo-11-39 using the Mfold program revealed a stable stem-loop structure at the extreme 5′ end of the genome, many picornaviruses have such a feature (Fig. 2 (a)). Bat picornavirus group 3 has a section of the 5′-UTR with high nucleotide identity to the corresponding region of poliovirus (Lau et al., 2011). Similarly, the 5′-UTR of Bo-11-39 and Bo-12-3, 7, 11 and 38 also has a region (position from nt 353 to nt 527 in Bo-11-39 and nt 317 to nt 490 in Bo-12-3, 7, 11 and 38) with high similarity to that of human enteroviruses (76–81%) including poliovirus (75–81%). A potential structures for domain V of the Bo-11-39 IRES, which by analogy to the poliovirus IRES, should bind to eIF4G (de Breyne et al., 2009) is shown in Fig. 2(b). Both the base of the domain and the apex were extremely similar to other type I IRES elements and the domain is followed by a pyrimidine rich tract and then a short stem loop (domain VI), which contains an AUG and this is probably the site at which ribosomes start scanning although protein synthesis starts at the next AUG (at nt 554) (Fig. 2(c)). We predict that the translation initiation sites of Bo-11-39 and Bo-12-3, 7, 11 and 38 are at position nt 554 and nt 513, respectively, which is contained in the sequence GCCA554UGU in Bo-11-39 (Fig. 2(c)) and AACA513UGC in Bo-12-3, 7, 11 and 38. The initiation codon is not in an optimal Kozak context (Kozak, 1986) RNNAUGG with one nucleotide substitution (from G to U after AUG (RNNAUGU) in Bo-11-39 and G to C after AUG (RNNAUGC) in Bo-12-3, 7, 11 and 38). The 3′-UTR of bovine Japanese picornavirus was not closely related to any nucleotide sequences in the DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank database. There is less than 22.8% sequence identity within the 3′UTR between them and the unclassified Chinese picornaviruses.
Table 2

Pairwise nucleotide and amino acid identity (%) of the Bo-11-39/2009/JPN and Bo-12-3/2009/JPN to Chinese picornaviruses.

Pairwise nucleotide (5′UTR and 3′UTR), and amino acid (L, VP1-4, 2A-C, and 3A-D) identity (%)
Bo-11-39/2009/JPN
Bo-12-3/2009/JPNa
Bat-1(NC16A)Bat-2(MH9F)Bat-3(TLC5F)Feline(356F)Canine(325F)Bo-12-3Bat-1(NC16A)Bat-2(MH9F)Bat-3(TLC5F)Feline(356F)Canine(325F)
5′UTR22.222.241.720.141.957.524.224.138.523.338.5
L10.510.712.97.69.515.614.716.028.610.717.5
VP451.544.151.550.852.960.350.041.250.849.352.2
VP258.755.159.261.660.255.254.049.852.957.256.7
VP351.351.353.052.055.459.050.951.153.354.954.7
VP438.637.137.445.741.449.239.137.537.642.538.7
2A24.523.825.024.117.035.623.025.917.421.923.4
2B34.235.836.034.235.437.230.032.535.733.326.5
2C58.256.956.954.656.860.160.557.360.460.560.7
3A29.330.428.624.322.536.734.139.129.236.133.1
3B41.741.741.737.537.550.037.545.829.245.833.3
3C49.749.248.152.552.556.048.148.148.149.247.0
3D64.463.763.160.361.761.458.056.357.358.562.2
3'UTR16.218.518.422.816.026.714.818.414.220.013.3

5′UTR of Bo-12-3/2009/JPN is incomplete.

Fig. 2

Secondary structure prediction of elements within the 5′-UTR of Bo-11-39/2009/JPN generated using the Mfold program. (a) A stable stem-loop structure at the extreme 5' end of the 5′UTR (3-53 nt). (b) A conserved structure (loop B) of type I IRES (poliovirus [NC_002058]) and Bo-11-39 within the domain IV. (c) The domain V and VI of the IRES of type I IRES (poliovirus [NC_002058]) and Bo-11-39. The domain V, by analogy to the poliovirus IRES, should bind to eIF4G (Bo-11-39 position 378-488 nt). A short stem loop (analogous to domain VI in other type 1 IRES elements [Bo-11-39 position 513-531 nt]) contains an AUG and this is probably the site at which ribosomes start scanning. The pyrimidine tract is underlined. The AUG start codon is in boldface within the sequence GCCA554UGU and is included within the rectangle.

Pairwise nucleotide and amino acid identity (%) of the Bo-11-39/2009/JPN and Bo-12-3/2009/JPN to Chinese picornaviruses. 5′UTR of Bo-12-3/2009/JPN is incomplete. Secondary structure prediction of elements within the 5′-UTR of Bo-11-39/2009/JPN generated using the Mfold program. (a) A stable stem-loop structure at the extreme 5' end of the 5′UTR (3-53 nt). (b) A conserved structure (loop B) of type I IRES (poliovirus [NC_002058]) and Bo-11-39 within the domain IV. (c) The domain V and VI of the IRES of type I IRES (poliovirus [NC_002058]) and Bo-11-39. The domain V, by analogy to the poliovirus IRES, should bind to eIF4G (Bo-11-39 position 378-488 nt). A short stem loop (analogous to domain VI in other type 1 IRES elements [Bo-11-39 position 513-531 nt]) contains an AUG and this is probably the site at which ribosomes start scanning. The pyrimidine tract is underlined. The AUG start codon is in boldface within the sequence GCCA554UGU and is included within the rectangle.

Analyses of coding regions

For the coding regions, the predicted leader (L) protein of Bo-11-39 and Bo-12-3, 7, 11 and 38 are 59 and 61 aa long, respectively, and exhibit very low aa identities (less than 11.6%) to those of other representative picornaviruses, including unclassified Chinese picornaviruses. These L proteins are very short compared to viruses within the Aphthovirus and Erbovirus genera. The putative zing finger motifs which play a role in viral genome translation contained in the Cardiovirus genus were not found in the L proteins of the new bovine viruses (Chen et al., 1995, Dvorak et al., 2001). The function of these bovine Japanese picornavirus L proteins remains to be identified. The P1 region of the genomes of Bo-11-39 and Bo-12-3, 7, 11 and 38 encode the capsid proteins VP4, VP2, VP3, and VP1. Myristic acid is covalently linked to a glycine at the amino terminus of VP4 of most picornaviruses (Chow et al., 1987). A potential myristoylation motif (GxxxT/S) is present in VP4 of Bo-11-39 (G62vsnS) and Bo-12-3, 7, 11 and 38 (G62ltvS) (Fig. 1). The P2 region of the genomes of Bo-11-39 and Bo-12-3, 7, 11 and 38 encode the nonstructural proteins 2A, 2B, and 2C. The conserved GxCG motif, which is considered to form part of the active site of the protease (Gorbalenya et al., 1989a), in the 2A protein of Bo-11-39 (G1056wCG) and Bo-12-3, 7, 11 and 38 (G1060wCG) suggests that the 2A protein of these viruses cleaves at its own N-terminus, i.e. the VP1/2A junction. The conserved H-box/NC motif involved in cell proliferation control (Hughes and Stanway, 2000) was not present in the 2A. Similar to all the other picornaviruses, the NTP-binding motif GXXGXGKS (Gorbalenya et al., 1989b) was found in the 2C of Bo-11-39 and Bo-12-3, 7, 11 and 38 as G1337gpGsGKS and G1348apGtGKS, respectively. The DDLXQ motif is believed to be important for putative helicase activity (Gorbalenya et al., 1989a, Gorbalenya et al., 1990) but the third amino acid of this motif in the 2C of Bo-11-39 and Bo-12-3, 7, 11 and 38 was substituted by Val (D1385DVGQ and D1396DVGQ). The P3 genome region of Bo-11-39 Bo-12-3, 7, 11 and 38 encodes the non-structural proteins 3A, 3B, 3Cpro, and 3Dpol. The conserved catalytic triad of H-D/E-C was seen in 3Cpro of Bo-11-39 (H1700-D1737-C1794) and Bo-12-3, 7, 11 and 38 (H1736D1773-C1830). The conserved GxCG motif was also found in 3Cpro of Bo-11-39 (G1803qCG) and Bo-12-3, 7, 11 and 38 (G1839qCG), as with other picornaviruses. Two highly conserved motifs of RNA-dependent RNA polymerases (Kamer and Argos, 1984), K2001DELR, G2128GmPSG, Y2170GDD, and F2217LKR (Bo-11-39) and K2037DELR, G2164GmPSG, Y2206GDD, and F2253LKR (Bo-12-3, 7, 11 and 38), were also present in the 3Dpol of these viruses.

Phylogenetic analyses

Phylogenetic trees were constructed from the complete amino acid cording sequences for P1, 2C, 3CD, and VP1 of bovine Japanese picornaviruses together with representative strains of the different genera and some unclassified picornaviruses. Bo-11-39 and Bo-12-3, 7, 11 and 38 were closely related to each other and formed a distinct cluster in the 3CD and VP1 trees with high bootstrap support (98% and 79%). The bovine Japanese picornaviruses were related to enteroviruses, Sapeloviruses, and unclassified Chinese picornaviruses and formed an independent cluster with unclassified Chinese picornaviruses supported by high bootstrap value (76%–99%) in all four phylogenetic trees (Fig. 3 ).
Fig. 3

Phylogenetic analyses based on the complete amino acid sequences of P1 (a), 2C (b), 3CD (c), and VP1 (d) of Bo-11-39/2009/JPN, Bo-12-3/2009/JPN, Bo-12-7/2009/JPN, Bo-12-11/2009/JPN, and Bo-12-38/2009/JPN (black open box) with reference picornaviruses obtained from the DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank database. Phylogenetic trees were constructed using the maximum likelihood method in MEGA5.22 with bootstrap values (1000 replicates) above 70 being shown. The scale bar indicates amino acid substitutions per site.

Phylogenetic analyses based on the complete amino acid sequences of P1 (a), 2C (b), 3CD (c), and VP1 (d) of Bo-11-39/2009/JPN, Bo-12-3/2009/JPN, Bo-12-7/2009/JPN, Bo-12-11/2009/JPN, and Bo-12-38/2009/JPN (black open box) with reference picornaviruses obtained from the DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank database. Phylogenetic trees were constructed using the maximum likelihood method in MEGA5.22 with bootstrap values (1000 replicates) above 70 being shown. The scale bar indicates amino acid substitutions per site.

Prevalence investigation of bovine Japanese picornavirus using RT-PCR

The prevalence of bovine Japanese picornaviruses in Hokkaido Prefecture in 2009 was studied using RT-PCR assays performed using specific primers designed from the 5′UTR sequences. Fecal samples were collected from 87 cattle with diarrhea (calves: 47; heifers: 14; cows: 26) from 72 farms. Using standard diagnostic assays, the most common bovine viral pathogens that induce diarrhea were ruled out as being responsible. However, amplicons of the expected size (326 base pairs) consistent with the presence of the bovine Japanese picornaviruses were obtained from twenty of these samples (from 15 calves (32%), a heifer (7%) and four cows (15%)) from nineteen different farms.

Discussion

In recent years, the advances in the metagenomic field have permitted the definition of new viral genomic sequences for clinical and epidemiological research (Beerenwinkel et al., 2012, Mokili et al., 2011, Rosario and Breitbart, 2011). Deep sequencing technologies have facilitated virus discovery due to the potential to detect viruses having an unknown genetic background. In this study, we have discovered a new picornavirus from cattle using metagenomic technology. We tried to isolate viruses using primary bovine testis cells, primary bovine fetal muscles cells, the Madin–Darby Bovine Kidney cells, Vero cells, baby hamster kidney cells, cloned porcine kidney cells, and HRT-18 cells. Neither cytopathic effect nor the expected RT-PCR products from RNA extracted from cell culture supernatants were observed in any of the inoculated cells, indicating a lack of virus replication in these cell lines. However, using RNA-seq based strategy with DNase treatment before construction of cDNA libraries, we could obtain sufficient viral genomic sequences of RNA viruses from fecal samples not only for picornaviruses but also, in earlier studies, for other viruses such as rotavirus (Minami-Fukuda et al., 2013, Masuda et al., 2014, Nagai et al., 2015). Genomic characterization showed that these bovine Japanese picornaviruses had a genome organization similar to other picornaviruses, i.e. the presence of single large open reading frame flanked by UTRs. The 5′UTR of bovine Japanese picornavirus begins with a stem loop structure of about 50 nt, which is different from entero-/rhinoviruses that have a cloverleaf structure. However these viruses appear to have a type I IRES with a predicted domain IV (including a loop B), plus the domains V and VI including the eIF4G binding site and an AUG codon respectively, the latter is preceded by a polypyrimidine tract. Comparisons with representative strains of the different defined genera in the family Picornaviridae revealed that amino acid identities in the P1, P2, and P3 regions were up to 39.5, 30.5, and 45.9%, respectively. The Picornaviridae Study Group of the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses (http://www.picornastudygroup.com/definitions/genus_definition.htm) has proposed that different picornavirus genera are defined by amino acid identity in the P1, P2, and P3 regions being <40, <40, and <50%, respectively. Based on these criteria, bovine Japanese picornaviruses do not fall into the current official genera. On the other hand, bovine Japanese picornaviruses shared 45.4 to 51.4% (P1), 38.0 to 44.9% (P2), and 49.6 to 55.2% (P3) amino acid identities with certain unclassified Chinese picornaviruses; bat picornaviruses group 1-3 (Lau et al., 2011), feline picornavirus (Lau et al., 2012), and canine picornavirus (Woo et al., 2012), respectively. Furthermore, phylogenetic analyses demonstrated that bovine Japanese picornaviruses formed a cluster with unclassified Chinese picornaviruses in P1, 2C, 3CD, and VP1 coding regions, respectively, suggesting that bovine Japanese picornaviruses may be classified together with the currently unclassified Chinese picornaviruses into a novel genus in the family Picornaviridae. Detailed analyses showed that bovine Japanese picornaviruses possessed conserved characteristic motifs, similar to unclassified Chinese picornaviruses (e.g. protein cleavage sites, presence of a leader protein, 2A, 2C, 3C, and 3D functional domains), with minor variance. Genomic comparison of bovine Japanese picornaviruses with unclassified Chinese picornaviruses revealed that although amino acid identities in L, 2A, 2B, and 3A were low (<40%), amino acid identities in the other regions were higher and indicated that these viruses were moderately related to each other. Phylogenetic analysis of the VP1 coding regions indicated that bovine Japanese picornaviruses and unclassified Chinese picornaviruses formed a cluster with high bootstrap support, even though VP1 is the most diverse capsid protein of picornaviruses (Oberste et al., 1999, Rossmann et al., 1985). These findings suggest that they have a common ancestor. Bovine Japanese picornaviruses seem most related to bat picornavirus group 3 and canine picornaviruses which also contain a type I IRES. RNA viruses have a remarkable potential to evolve due to high mutation and recombination rates (Cook et al., 2013). Bovine Japanese picornaviruses may be derived from the unclassified Chinese picornavirus and have evolved independently in cattle in Japan. Finally, RT-PCR assays identified the presence of RNA from bovine Japanese picornaviruses in 15 calves (32%), one heifer (7%), and four cows (15%) with diarrhea from 19 farms. These finding indicates that these viruses are circulating in Hokkaido Prefecture in Japan. The potential transmission of these viruses to other domestic animals or human should be clarified. Since we did not perform analyses using fecal samples of cattle without diarrhea, the association of bovine Japanese picornaviruses with bovine diarrhea is unclear. To clarify whether they are associated or causal for bovine diarrhea, further studies are needed.
  36 in total

1.  The 2A proteins of three diverse picornaviruses are related to each other and to the H-rev107 family of proteins involved in the control of cell proliferation.

Authors:  P J Hughes; G Stanway
Journal:  J Gen Virol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.891

2.  Complete genome sequence of a novel picornavirus, canine picornavirus, discovered in dogs.

Authors:  Patrick C Y Woo; Susanna K P Lau; Garnet K Y Choi; Cyril C Y Yip; Yi Huang; Hoi-Wah Tsoi; Kwok-Yung Yuen
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 5.103

Review 3.  Cysteine proteases of positive strand RNA viruses and chymotrypsin-like serine proteases. A distinct protein superfamily with a common structural fold.

Authors:  A E Gorbalenya; A P Donchenko; V M Blinov; E V Koonin
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  1989-01-30       Impact factor: 4.124

4.  H2 genotypes of G4P[6], G5P[7], and G9[23] porcine rotaviruses show super-short RNA electropherotypes.

Authors:  Makoto Nagai; Saya Shimada; Yoshiki Fujii; Hiromitsu Moriyama; Mami Oba; Yukie Katayama; Shinobu Tsuchiaka; Sachiko Okazaki; Tsutomu Omatsu; Tetsuya Furuya; Satoshi Koyama; Junsuke Shirai; Kazuhiko Katayama; Tetsuya Mizutani
Journal:  Vet Microbiol       Date:  2015-02-09       Impact factor: 3.293

Review 5.  Divergent picornavirus IRES elements.

Authors:  Graham J Belsham
Journal:  Virus Res       Date:  2008-08-20       Impact factor: 3.303

6.  A new superfamily of putative NTP-binding domains encoded by genomes of small DNA and RNA viruses.

Authors:  A E Gorbalenya; E V Koonin; Y I Wolf
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  1990-03-12       Impact factor: 4.124

7.  Structure of a human common cold virus and functional relationship to other picornaviruses.

Authors:  M G Rossmann; E Arnold; J W Erickson; E A Frankenberger; J P Griffith; H J Hecht; J E Johnson; G Kamer; M Luo; A G Mosser
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1985 Sep 12-18       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Novel picornavirus in domesticated common quail (Coturnix coturnix) in Hungary.

Authors:  Péter Pankovics; Akos Boros; Gábor Reuter
Journal:  Arch Virol       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 2.574

Review 9.  Metagenomics and future perspectives in virus discovery.

Authors:  John L Mokili; Forest Rohwer; Bas E Dutilh
Journal:  Curr Opin Virol       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 7.090

10.  Detection of bovine group a rotavirus using rapid antigen detection kits, rt-PCR and next-generation DNA sequencing.

Authors:  Fujiko Minami-Fukuda; Makoto Nagai; Hikaru Takai; Toshiaki Murakami; Tadashi Ozawa; Shinobu Tsuchiaka; Sachiko Okazaki; Yukie Katayama; Mami Oba; Naomi Nishiura; Yukiko Sassa; Tsutomu Omatsu; Tetsuya Furuya; Satoshi Koyama; Junsuke Shirai; Hiroshi Tsunemitsu; Yoshiki Fujii; Kazuhiko Katayama; Tetsuya Mizutani
Journal:  J Vet Med Sci       Date:  2013-08-02       Impact factor: 1.267

View more
  7 in total

1.  Identification of a novel bovine enterovirus possessing highly divergent amino acid sequences in capsid protein.

Authors:  Shinobu Tsuchiaka; Sayed Samim Rahpaya; Konosuke Otomaru; Hiroshi Aoki; Mai Kishimoto; Yuki Naoi; Tsutomu Omatsu; Kaori Sano; Sachiko Okazaki-Terashima; Yukie Katayama; Mami Oba; Makoto Nagai; Tetsuya Mizutani
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2017-01-17       Impact factor: 3.605

2.  Novel Picornavirus in Lambs with Severe Encephalomyelitis.

Authors:  Leonie F Forth; Sandra F E Scholes; Patricia A Pesavento; Kenneth Jackson; Adrienne Mackintosh; Amanda Carson; Fiona Howie; Kore Schlottau; Kerstin Wernike; Anne Pohlmann; Dirk Höper; Martin Beer
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 6.883

Review 3.  Taxonomic Changes for Human and Animal Viruses, 2018 to 2020.

Authors:  Michael J Loeffelholz; Bradley W Fenwick
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 4.  A decade of RNA virus metagenomics is (not) enough.

Authors:  Alexander L Greninger
Journal:  Virus Res       Date:  2017-10-18       Impact factor: 3.303

5.  Virus Metagenomics in Farm Animals: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Kirsty T T Kwok; David F Nieuwenhuijse; My V T Phan; Marion P G Koopmans
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2020-01-16       Impact factor: 5.048

6.  Identification of boosepivirus B in U.S. calves.

Authors:  Ben M Hause; Eric Nelson; Jane Christopher-Hennings
Journal:  Arch Virol       Date:  2021-09-15       Impact factor: 2.574

7.  Identification and genome analysis of a novel picornavirus from captive belugas (Delphinapterus leucas) in China.

Authors:  Gaoyu Wang; Yi Huang; Weijia Zhang; Ruoyan Peng; Jun Luo; Sisi Liu; Shijie Bai; Xiaoyuan Hu; Zhiqiang Wu; Fan Yang; Shu Shen; Yun Zhang; Chuanning Tang; Xiuji Cui; Lina Niu; Gang Lu; Songhai Li; Fei Deng; Peijun Zhang; Jiang Du; Feifei Yin
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-10-25       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.