Literature DB >> 26260092

Safety of Magnetic Resonance Imaging After Implantation of Stainless Steel Embolization Coils.

Timothy C Slesnick1, Jenna Schreier2, Brian D Soriano3, Shelby Kutty4, Arni C Nutting5, Dennis W Kim6, Andrew J Powell7, Anne Marie Valente8.   

Abstract

Stainless steel embolization coils (SSEC) have been used for over four decades for vascular occlusion. Recently, the safety of these coils in a magnetic resonance environment has been called into question, with important ramifications for thousands of patients with existing coils in place. We performed a retrospective chart review at five tertiary care pediatric centers evaluating all children and young adults with implanted SSEC who underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Data reviewed included demographics, coil implantation, MRI studies, and follow-up evaluations. Complications such as heating, discomfort, or device migration were specifically sought. Two hundred and ninety-seven patients with implanted SSEC underwent 539 MRI examinations. The median age at SSEC implantation was 2.3 years (1 week-23.2 years). The MRI studies were performed a median of 7.4 years (4 days-23.1 years) after implantation. No patients experienced any reported complications associated with their MRI examinations during the study or at median follow-up post-MRI of 4.8 years (1 day-23 years). In this large, retrospective review of patients with implanted SSEC undergoing MRI, there were no reported adverse events. These findings support the recent change by Cook Medical Inc. of their standard embolization coils from a designation of magnetic resonance unsafe to conditional.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Congenital heart disease; Magnetic resonance imaging; Pediatrics; Safety; Stainless steel embolization coils

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26260092     DOI: 10.1007/s00246-015-1240-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol        ISSN: 0172-0643            Impact factor:   1.655


  14 in total

1.  Halo vest for cervical spine fixation during MR imaging.

Authors:  F G Shellock; G Slimp
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  Effects of metallic implants on magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of Fontan palliation.

Authors:  Ruchira Garg; Andrew J Powell; Laureen Sena; Audrey C Marshall; Tal Geva
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2005-03-01       Impact factor: 2.778

3.  Comments on MR heating tests of critical implants.

Authors:  Frank G Shellock
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 4.  Introduction to the MAUDE database.

Authors:  Shawn E Gurtcheff
Journal:  Clin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 2.190

5.  MR heating tests of MR critical implants.

Authors:  Wolfgang Kainz
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 4.813

6.  Evaluation of the translational and rotational forces acting on a highly ferromagnetic orthopedic spinal implant in magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Christie McComb; David Allan; Barrie Condon
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 4.813

7.  Transcatheter occlusion of abdominal tumors.

Authors:  H M Goldstein; S Wallace; J H Anderson; R L Bree; C Gianturco
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1976-09       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  MRI issues for ballistic objects: information obtained at 1.5-, 3- and 7-Tesla.

Authors:  Russell D Dedini; Alexandra M Karacozoff; Frank G Shellock; Duan Xu; R Trigg McClellan; Murat Pekmezci
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2013-04-03       Impact factor: 4.166

Review 9.  MR procedures and biomedical implants, materials, and devices: 1993 update.

Authors:  F G Shellock; S Morisoli; E Kanal
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Mechanical devices for arterial occlusion.

Authors:  C Gianturco; J H Anderson; S Wallace
Journal:  Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med       Date:  1975-07
View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Magnetic resonance imaging in children with implants.

Authors:  Camilo Jaimes; Diane Biaggotti; Gayathri Sreedher; Apeksha Chaturvedi; Michael M Moore; Amy R Danehy
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2021-04-19

Review 2.  Advances in Biomaterials and Technologies for Vascular Embolization.

Authors:  Jingjie Hu; Hassan Albadawi; Brian W Chong; Amy R Deipolyi; Rahul A Sheth; Ali Khademhosseini; Rahmi Oklu
Journal:  Adv Mater       Date:  2019-06-06       Impact factor: 30.849

3.  Patients with in-situ metallic coils and Amplatzer vascular plugs used to treat pulmonary arteriovenous malformations since 1984 can safely undergo magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Ali Alsafi; James E Jackson; Gavin Fatania; Maneesh C Patel; Alan Glover; Claire L Shovlin
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-04-24       Impact factor: 3.039

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.