Literature DB >> 26260037

The comparative effects of group prenatal care on psychosocial outcomes.

Emily C Heberlein1, Amy H Picklesimer2, Deborah L Billings3, Sarah Covington-Kolb2, Naomi Farber4, Edward A Frongillo3.   

Abstract

To compare the psychosocial outcomes of the CenteringPregnancy (CP) model of group prenatal care to individual prenatal care, we conducted a prospective cohort study of women who chose CP group (N = 124) or individual prenatal care (N = 124). Study participants completed the first survey at study recruitment (mean gestational age 12.5 weeks), with 89% completing the second survey (mean gestational age 32.7 weeks) and 84% completing the third survey (6 weeks' postpartum). Multiple linear regression models compared changes by prenatal care model in pregnancy-specific distress, prenatal planning-preparation and avoidance coping, perceived stress, affect and depressive symptoms, pregnancy-related empowerment, and postpartum maternal-infant attachment and maternal functioning. Using intention-to-treat models, group prenatal care participants demonstrated a 3.2 point greater increase (p < 0.05) in their use of prenatal planning-preparation coping strategies. While group participants did not demonstrate significantly greater positive outcomes in other measures, women who were at greater psychosocial risk benefitted from participation in group prenatal care. Among women reporting inadequate social support in early pregnancy, group participants demonstrated a 2.9 point greater decrease (p = 0.03) in pregnancy-specific distress in late pregnancy and 5.6 point higher mean maternal functioning scores postpartum (p = 0.03). Among women with high pregnancy-specific distress in early pregnancy, group participants had an 8.3 point greater increase (p < 0.01) in prenatal planning-preparation coping strategies in late pregnancy and a 4.9 point greater decrease (p = 0.02) in postpartum depressive symptom scores. This study provides further evidence that group prenatal care positively impacts the psychosocial well-being of women with greater stress or lower personal coping resources. Large randomized studies are needed to establish conclusively the biological and psychosocial benefits of group prenatal care for all women.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CenteringPregnancy; Group prenatal care; Pregnancy-related distress; Prenatal care; Prenatal coping; Psychosocial outcomes

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26260037     DOI: 10.1007/s00737-015-0564-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Womens Ment Health        ISSN: 1434-1816            Impact factor:   3.633


  18 in total

Review 1.  Conceptualization, measurement, and effects of pregnancy-specific stress: review of research using the original and revised Prenatal Distress Questionnaire.

Authors:  Sirena M Ibrahim; Marci Lobel
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2019-06-10

Review 2.  [Practical implementation of an integrated care model in mother-child treatment].

Authors:  J Kunze; K Wagner; E Fittig
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.214

3.  Trajectories of social support in pregnancy and early postpartum: findings from the All Our Families cohort.

Authors:  Erin Hetherington; Sheila McDonald; Tyler Williamson; Suzanne Tough
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2019-06-29       Impact factor: 4.328

4.  Maternal socioeconomic disadvantage is associated with transcriptional indications of greater immune activation and slower tissue maturation in placental biopsies and newborn cord blood.

Authors:  Gregory E Miller; Ann E Borders; Amy H Crockett; Kharah M Ross; Sameen Qadir; Lauren Keenan-Devlin; Adam K Leigh; Paula Ham; Jeffrey Ma; Jesusa M G Arevalo; Linda M Ernst; Steve W Cole
Journal:  Brain Behav Immun       Date:  2017-04-21       Impact factor: 7.217

Review 5.  Group Prenatal Care Compared With Traditional Prenatal Care: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ebony B Carter; Lorene A Temming; Jennifer Akin; Susan Fowler; George A Macones; Graham A Colditz; Methodius G Tuuli
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 7.661

6.  Vulnerable Women's Perceptions of Individual Versus Group Prenatal Care: Results of a Cross-Sectional Survey.

Authors:  Erin Hetherington; Suzanne Tough; Deborah McNeil; Hamideh Bayrampour; Amy Metcalfe
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2018-11

7.  Longitudinal effects of perinatal social support on maternal depression: a marginal structural modelling approach.

Authors:  Ashley Hagaman; Katherine LeMasters; Paul N Zivich; Siham Sikander; Lisa M Bates; Sonia Bhalotra; Esther O Chung; Ahmed Zaidi; Joanna Maselko
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2021-03-12       Impact factor: 3.710

8.  Bridging the Chasm between Pregnancy and Health over the Life Course: A National Agenda for Research and Action.

Authors:  Lois McCloskey; Judith Bernstein; Ndidimaka Amutah-Onukagha; Jodi Anthony; Mary Barger; Candice Belanoff; Trude Bennett; Chloe E Bird; Denise Bolds; Burke-Weber Brenna; Rebecca Carter; Ann Celi; Breanna Chachere; Joia Crear-Perry; Chase Crossno; Alba Cruz-Davis; Karla Damus; Alissa Dangel; Zendilli Depina; Phyllisa Deroze; Colette Dieujuste; Annie Dude; Joyce Edmonds; Daniel Enquobahrie; Ebosetale Eromosele; Erin Ferranti; Mary Fitzmaurice; Christina Gebel; Linda Goler Blount; Ann Greiner; Sue Gullo; Amy Haddad; Nneka Hall; Arden Handler; Irene Headen; Lisa Heelan-Fancher; Teri Hernandez; Kay Johnson; Emily Jones; NeKeshia Jones; Stacey Klaman; Barbara Lund; Monica Mallampalli; Lilly Marcelin; Cassondra Marshall; Bridgette Maynard; Shondra McCage; Suzanne Mitchell; Rose Molina; Suzi Montasir; Jacinda Nicklas; Alyson Northrup; Anna Norton; Ebere Oparaeke; Athena Ramos; Sue Rericha; Elena Rios; Joan Rosen Bloch; Cassie Ryan; Suzanne Sarfaty; Ellen Seely; Vivienne Souter; Martina Spain; Randiesa Spires; Suzanne Theberge; Tamara Thompson; Madi Wachman; Tina Yarrington; Lynn M Yee; Chloe Zera; Janine Clayton; Christina Lachance
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2021-03-08

9.  The impact of COVID-19 on pregnant womens' experiences and perceptions of antenatal maternity care, social support, and stress-reduction strategies.

Authors:  Sarah Meaney; Sara Leitao; Ellinor K Olander; Johanna Pope; Karen Matvienko-Sikar
Journal:  Women Birth       Date:  2021-05-06       Impact factor: 3.349

10.  The Fort McMurray Mommy Baby Study: A Protocol to Reduce Maternal Stress Due to the 2016 Fort McMurray Wood Buffalo, Alberta, Canada Wildfire.

Authors:  Ashley Hyde; Barbara S E Verstraeten; Joanne K Olson; Suzanne King; Suzette Brémault-Phillips; David M Olson
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2021-06-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.