| Literature DB >> 26259824 |
Rui Liu1, Xia Li2, Zhuoya Zhang3, Min Zhou1, Yue Sun3, Dinglei Su1, Xuebing Feng1, Xiang Gao4, Songtao Shi5, Wanjun Chen6, Lingyun Sun1.
Abstract
T follicular helper (Tfh) cells provide help for antigen-specific B cells. We have previously shown that Tfh cell frequency was increased and associated with auto-antibodies in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), suggesting a possible involvement of Tfh cells in its pathogenesis. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) represent a promising alternative cell therapy for RA by modulating T and B cell activation and proliferation. However, it remains unknown whether MSCs have immunoregulation on Tfh cells. In this paper, we have demonstrated that allogeneic MSCs could suppress Tfh cell differentiation in RA patients partly via the production of indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO). IFNγ generated from Tfh cell differentiation system induced IDO expression on MSCs. MSCs transplantation (MSCT) into collagen-induced arthritis (CIA) mice prevented arthritis progression by inhibiting both the number and function of Tfh cells in vivo. These findings reveal a novel suppressive function of MSCs in Tfh cells, which has implication in understanding the underlying mechanisms of the immunotherapeutic effects of MSCs on RA patients.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26259824 PMCID: PMC4531289 DOI: 10.1038/srep12777
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1UC-MSCs suppressed the differentiation and proliferation of Tfh cells in RA patients.
(a) RA and HC naïve CD4+T cells (1 × 106/well) were differentiated into Tfh cells under Tfh cell-polarizing condition for 3 days. Then these differentiating Tfh cells were washed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and further expanded alone or cocultured with UC-MSCs (1 × 105/well) in the presence of 3 μg/ml soluble anti-CD3/28 for another 2 days. UC-MSCs inhibited the differentiation of Tfh cells in both RA patients (N = 4) and HC (N = 4). (b) The level of IL-21 significantly decreased in the supernatant of each group of Fig. a after 5 days’ coculture (N = 4). (c) CD4+T cells (1 × 106/well) labeled with CFSE were cocultured with UC-MSCs (1 × 105/well) for 4 days. UC-MSCs inhibited the proliferation of Tfh cells in both RA patients (N = 6) and HC (N = 5). (d) CD4+T cells (1 × 106/well) were cocultured with UC-MSCs (1 × 105/well) for 3 days. UC-MSC had no effect on the apoptosis of Tfh cells in RA patients (N = 3) or HC (N = 6). **p < 0.01; *p < 0.05.
Figure 2UC-MSCs inhibited Tfh cell differentiation through the release of IDO.
(a) UC-MSCs were collected after 2 days’ coculture with differentiating RA Tfh cells and then were fixed by Trizol. The mRNA expressions of IDO, IL-10 and HLA-G were upregulated on UC-MSCs when cocultured with RA Tfh cells (N = 4). (b) Levels of kynurenine, IL-10 and HLA-G increased in the supernatants of each group of Fig. a (N = 4). (c) 100 μM 1-MT or 10 μg/ml anti-IL-10 antibody or 10 μg/ml anti-HLA-G antibody was added to the MSCs-Tfh cells coculture system for 2 days’ culture. 1-MT, but not anti-IL-10 or anti-HLA-G could block the suppressive effect of UC-MSCs on Tfh cells (N = 3). **p < 0.01; *p < 0.05.
Figure 3IFNγ promoted IDO production by UC-MSCs.
(a) The level of IFNγ significantly increased in the supernatant of UC-MSCs and RA differentiating Tfh cells coculture system (N = 5). (b) The mRNA expression of IFNγR1 and IFNγR2 downregulated markedly in UC-MSCs transfected with a combination of siR1 and siR2 versus UC-MSCs transfected with siNC. (c) UC-MSCs (1 × 105/well) with IFNγR1 and IFNγR2 double knockdown were collected after 2 days’ coculture with differentiating Tfh cells and then were fixed by Trizol. These UC-MSCs had lower IDO mRNA expression after cocultured with RA differentiating Tfh cells (N = 3). (d) The suspension cells were collected from the coculture system of Fig. c and then analyzed by FACS. UC-MSCs with IFNγR1 and IFNγR2 double knockdown could not suppress the differentiation of Tfh cells effectively in RA patients (N = 3). **p < 0.01; *p < 0.05.
Figure 4UC-MSCs ameliorated the progression of CIA.
(a) The severity of CIA was progressively attenuated in UC-MSCs-treated group (N = 5). (b) Arthritis score was decreased in UC-MSCs-treated group (N = 5). (c) The level of anti-CII antibody was significantly downregulated in UC-MSCs-treated group (N = 5). (d) H&E staining exhibited marked improvement of mononuclear cell infiltration, severe synovitis, pannus formation and bone erosion in UC-MSCs-treated group. (N = 5). **p < 0.01; *p < 0.05.
Figure 5UC-MSCs downregulated both number and function of Tfh cells in vivo.
(a) UC-MSCs infusion decreased the frequency of splenic CD4+CD44hiCXCR5hiPD-1hiTfh cells in CIA mice (N = 5). (b) CD4+CXCR5+T cells (1 × 105 cells/ well) were purified from the spleen of each group and then cocultured with splenic B cells (3 × 105 cells/well) purified from normal mice for 5 days. The frequency of plasma cells were significantly upregulated in UC-MSCs-treated CIA mice after CD4+CXC5+T cells coculturing with B220+B cells (N = 5). (c) The levels of supernatant IgG or IgM reduced in the coculture system of CD4+CXCR5+Tfh cells from each group mice and B cells (N = 5). **p < 0.01; *p < 0.05.
Clinical characteristics of 45 RA patients.
| Characteristics | Values |
|---|---|
| Age, yrs | 54.7 ± 2.3 |
| Men/women | 6/39 |
| Disease duration, yrs | 13.1 ± 5.2 |
| DAS28 | 5.2 ± 0.7 |
| ESR, mm/h | 59.4 ± 2.0 |
| CRP, mg/l | 34.0 ± 3.8 |
The primers for different genes.
| Genes | Primers |
|---|---|
| GAPDH | 5′-GCACCGTCAAGGCTGAGAAC-3′(forward) |
| 5′-TGGTGAAGACGCCAGTGGA-3′(reverse) | |
| Bcl-6 | 5′-GTTTCCGGCACCTTCAGACT-3′ (forward) |
| 5′-CTGGCTTTTGTGACGGAAAT-3′ (reverse) | |
| T-bet | 5′-AACATCCTGTAGTGGCTGGTG-3′ (forward) |
| 5′-CCACCTGTTGTGGTCCAAGT-3′ (reverse) | |
| GATA3 | 5′-TTCCTCCTCCAGAGTGTGGT-3′ (forward) |
| 5′-AAAATGAACGGACAGAACCG-3′ (reverse) | |
| RORA | 5′-TCTCCCTGCGCTCTCCGCAC-3′ (forward) |
| 5′-TCCACAGATCTTGCATGGA-3′ (reverse) | |
| IL-21 | 5′-CATGGAGAGGATTGTCATCTGTC-3′ (forward) |
| 5′-CAGAAATTCAGGGACCAAGTCAT-3′ (reverse) | |
| IDO | 5′-GAATGGCACACGCTATGGAA-3′ (forward) |
| 5′-CAGACTCTATGAGATCAGGCAGATG-3′ (reverse) | |
| HGF | 5′-GTCAGCCCTGGAGTTCCATGATA-3′ (forward) |
| 5′-AGCGTACCTCTGGATTGCTTGTG-3′ (reverse) | |
| TGF-β1 | 5′-AGCGACTCGCCAGAGTGGTTA-3′ (forward) |
| 5′-GCAGTGTGTTATCCCTGCTGTCA-3′ (reverse) | |
| IL-10 | 5′-GAGATGCCTTCAGCAGAGTGAAGA-3′ (forward) |
| 5′-AGTTCACATGCGCCTTGATGTC-3′ (reverse) | |
| HLA-G | 5′-CCTTGCAGCTGTAGTCACTGGA-3′ (forward) |
| 5′-CACACAGGGCAGCTGTTTCA-3′ (reverse) | |
| COX-2 | 5′-TGACCAGAGCAGGCAGATGAA-3′ (forward) |
| 5′-CCACAGCATCGATGTCACCATAG-3′ (reverse) |