Jesper Kristiansen1, Søren Peter Lund2, Roger Persson3, Rasmus Challi4, Janni Moon Lindskov4, Per Møberg Nielsen5, Per Knudgaard Larsen6, Jørn Toftum7. 1. The National Research Centre for the Working Environment, Lersø Parkalle 105, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark. jkr@nrcwe.dk. 2. The National Research Centre for the Working Environment, Lersø Parkalle 105, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark. 3. Department of Psychology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden. 4. Danish Centre of Educational Environment (DCUM), Randers, Denmark. 5. Akustik Aps, 2500, Valby, Denmark. 6. AB Akustik, Skanderborg, Denmark. 7. Department of Civil Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To investigate whether acoustical refurbishment of classrooms for elementary and lower secondary grade pupils affected teachers' perceived noise exposure during teaching and noise-related health symptoms. METHODS: Two schools (A and B) with a total of 102 teachers were subjected to an acoustical intervention. Accordingly, 36 classrooms (20 and 16 in school A and school B, respectively) were acoustically refurbished and 31 classrooms (16 and 15 in school A and school B, respectively) were not changed. Thirteen classrooms in school A were interim "sham" refurbished. Control measurements of RT and activity sound levels were measured before and after refurbishment. Data on perceived noise exposure, disturbance attributed to different noise sources, voice symptoms, and fatigue after work were collected over a year in a total of six consecutive questionnaires. RESULTS: Refurbished classrooms were associated with lower perceived noise exposure and lower ratings of disturbance attributed to noise from equipment in the class compared with unrefurbished classrooms. No associations between the classroom refurbishment and health symptoms were observed. Before acoustical refurbishment, the mean classroom reverberation time was 0.68 (school A) and 0.57 (school B) and 0.55 s in sham refurbished classrooms. After refurbishment, the RT was approximately 0.4 s in both schools. Activity sound level measurements confirmed that the intervention had reduced the equivalent sound levels during lessons with circa 2 dB(A) in both schools. CONCLUSION: The acoustical refurbishment was associated with a reduction in classroom reverberation time and activity sound levels in both schools. The acoustical refurbishment was associated with a reduction in the teachers' perceived noise exposure, and reports of disturbance from equipment in the classroom decreased. There was no significant effect of the refurbishment on the teachers' voice symptoms or fatigue after work.
OBJECTIVES: To investigate whether acoustical refurbishment of classrooms for elementary and lower secondary grade pupils affected teachers' perceived noise exposure during teaching and noise-related health symptoms. METHODS: Two schools (A and B) with a total of 102 teachers were subjected to an acoustical intervention. Accordingly, 36 classrooms (20 and 16 in school A and school B, respectively) were acoustically refurbished and 31 classrooms (16 and 15 in school A and school B, respectively) were not changed. Thirteen classrooms in school A were interim "sham" refurbished. Control measurements of RT and activity sound levels were measured before and after refurbishment. Data on perceived noise exposure, disturbance attributed to different noise sources, voice symptoms, and fatigue after work were collected over a year in a total of six consecutive questionnaires. RESULTS: Refurbished classrooms were associated with lower perceived noise exposure and lower ratings of disturbance attributed to noise from equipment in the class compared with unrefurbished classrooms. No associations between the classroom refurbishment and health symptoms were observed. Before acoustical refurbishment, the mean classroom reverberation time was 0.68 (school A) and 0.57 (school B) and 0.55 s in sham refurbished classrooms. After refurbishment, the RT was approximately 0.4 s in both schools. Activity sound level measurements confirmed that the intervention had reduced the equivalent sound levels during lessons with circa 2 dB(A) in both schools. CONCLUSION: The acoustical refurbishment was associated with a reduction in classroom reverberation time and activity sound levels in both schools. The acoustical refurbishment was associated with a reduction in the teachers' perceived noise exposure, and reports of disturbance from equipment in the classroom decreased. There was no significant effect of the refurbishment on the teachers' voice symptoms or fatigue after work.
Entities:
Keywords:
Acoustical working environment; Classroom acoustics; Extra-auditory effects of noise exposure; Intervention; Noise exposure; Well-being
Authors: Jesper Kristiansen; Søren Peter Lund; Roger Persson; Hitomi Shibuya; Per Møberg Nielsen; Matthias Scholz Journal: Int Arch Occup Environ Health Date: 2014-01-25 Impact factor: 3.015