BACKGROUND: The 22q11 deletion syndrome (22q11DS) is one of the most common multiple anomaly syndromes, with an incidence of approximately one per 4000 newborns. Although a patient may have several not too severe symptoms, the cumulative effect may be substantial disability. The aim of this study was to explore and describe parents' experiences of the diagnostic process and of being parents of a child with 22q11DS. METHODS: Open, tape-recorded interviews were carried out with 12 parents. The interviews were analysed in accordance with classical grounded theory. RESULTS: The analysis show that parents describe the disclosure of their child's medical diagnosis as two-sided, ambivalence between relief and sorrow, and the differences between these two aspects were related to the age of the child at time of diagnosis as well as to the problems and symptoms that had led to the diagnosis. Different strategies for handling this ambivalence are presented in the categories. CONCLUSIONS: Our conclusions are that information must be individually tailored, and there is no standard format for how to describe the syndrome to the parents. After disclosure, scheduled appointments for follow-up on diagnosis-related information is essential.
BACKGROUND: The 22q11 deletion syndrome (22q11DS) is one of the most common multiple anomaly syndromes, with an incidence of approximately one per 4000 newborns. Although a patient may have several not too severe symptoms, the cumulative effect may be substantial disability. The aim of this study was to explore and describe parents' experiences of the diagnostic process and of being parents of a child with 22q11DS. METHODS: Open, tape-recorded interviews were carried out with 12 parents. The interviews were analysed in accordance with classical grounded theory. RESULTS: The analysis show that parents describe the disclosure of their child's medical diagnosis as two-sided, ambivalence between relief and sorrow, and the differences between these two aspects were related to the age of the child at time of diagnosis as well as to the problems and symptoms that had led to the diagnosis. Different strategies for handling this ambivalence are presented in the categories. CONCLUSIONS: Our conclusions are that information must be individually tailored, and there is no standard format for how to describe the syndrome to the parents. After disclosure, scheduled appointments for follow-up on diagnosis-related information is essential.
Authors: Fionnuala Larkin; Marianna E Hayiou-Thomas; Zaynah Arshad; Matthew Leonard; Frances J Williams; Nicoletta Katseniou; Rania N Malouta; Charlotte R P Marshall; Maria Diamantopoulou; Etonia Tang; Sneha Mani; Elizabeth Meins Journal: J Autism Dev Disord Date: 2021-02
Authors: Megan R Glassford; Ryan H Purcell; Sarah Pass; Melissa M Murphy; Gary J Bassell; Jennifer G Mulle Journal: J Dev Behav Pediatr Date: 2022 Feb-Mar 01 Impact factor: 2.225
Authors: Lotte Krabbenborg; L E L M Vissers; J Schieving; T Kleefstra; E J Kamsteeg; J A Veltman; M A Willemsen; S Van der Burg Journal: J Genet Couns Date: 2016-04-20 Impact factor: 2.537