BACKGROUND: The Nintendo® Wii is a simple and affordable virtual therapy alternative. It may be used at home, and it is a motivating recreational activity that provides continuous feedback. However, studies comparing the use of the Nintendo® Wii to conventional physical therapy are needed. OBJECTIVE: To compare the effect of a rehabilitation treatment using the Nintendo® Wii (NW) with conventional physical therapy (CPT) to improve the sensorimotor function and quality of life for post-stroke hemiparetic patients. METHODS: The present study applied a randomized, blind, and controlled clinical trial. In total, 30 patients with post-stroke hemiparesis were evaluated. A total of 15 patients were randomly assigned to each group. The SF-36 quality of life and Fugl-Meyer scales were used to evaluate the patients. RESULTS: After treatment, the only variable that differed between the groups was the physical functioning domain of the SF-36 in the group that received conventional physical therapy. A significant difference was observed between both groups before and after treatment in terms of the following Fugl-Meyer scale items: passive movement and pain, motor function of the upper limbs (ULs), and balance. The CPT group also showed a significant difference with regard to their UL and lower limb (LL) coordination. The SF-36 scale analysis revealed a significant difference within both groups with regard to the following domains: physical functioning, role limitation due to physical aspects, vitality, and role limitation due to emotional aspects. The NW group also exhibited a significant difference in the mental health domain. The results indicate that both approaches improved the patients' performance in a similar manner. CONCLUSION:Virtual rehabilitation using the Nintendo Wii® and CPT both effectively treat post-stroke hemiparetic patients by improving passive movement and pain scores, motor function of the upper limb, balance, physical functioning, vitality, and the physical and emotional aspects of role functioning.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: The Nintendo® Wii is a simple and affordable virtual therapy alternative. It may be used at home, and it is a motivating recreational activity that provides continuous feedback. However, studies comparing the use of the Nintendo® Wii to conventional physical therapy are needed. OBJECTIVE: To compare the effect of a rehabilitation treatment using the Nintendo® Wii (NW) with conventional physical therapy (CPT) to improve the sensorimotor function and quality of life for post-stroke hemipareticpatients. METHODS: The present study applied a randomized, blind, and controlled clinical trial. In total, 30 patients with post-stroke hemiparesis were evaluated. A total of 15 patients were randomly assigned to each group. The SF-36 quality of life and Fugl-Meyer scales were used to evaluate the patients. RESULTS: After treatment, the only variable that differed between the groups was the physical functioning domain of the SF-36 in the group that received conventional physical therapy. A significant difference was observed between both groups before and after treatment in terms of the following Fugl-Meyer scale items: passive movement and pain, motor function of the upper limbs (ULs), and balance. The CPT group also showed a significant difference with regard to their UL and lower limb (LL) coordination. The SF-36 scale analysis revealed a significant difference within both groups with regard to the following domains: physical functioning, role limitation due to physical aspects, vitality, and role limitation due to emotional aspects. The NW group also exhibited a significant difference in the mental health domain. The results indicate that both approaches improved the patients' performance in a similar manner. CONCLUSION: Virtual rehabilitation using the Nintendo Wii® and CPT both effectively treat post-stroke hemipareticpatients by improving passive movement and pain scores, motor function of the upper limb, balance, physical functioning, vitality, and the physical and emotional aspects of role functioning.
Authors: Chris Gibbons; Ian Porter; Daniela C Gonçalves-Bradley; Stanimir Stoilov; Ignacio Ricci-Cabello; Elena Tsangaris; Jaheeda Gangannagaripalli; Antoinette Davey; Elizabeth J Gibbons; Anna Kotzeva; Jonathan Evans; Philip J van der Wees; Evangelos Kontopantelis; Joanne Greenhalgh; Peter Bower; Jordi Alonso; Jose M Valderas Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2021-10-12
Authors: Madeleine Ordnung; Maike Hoff; Elisabeth Kaminski; Arno Villringer; Patrick Ragert Journal: Front Hum Neurosci Date: 2017-04-04 Impact factor: 3.169
Authors: Carol S Bruggers; Sabrina Baranowski; Mathew Beseris; Rachel Leonard; Derek Long; Elizabeth Schulte; Ashton Shorter; Rowan Stigner; Clinton C Mason; Alisa Bedrov; Ian Pascual; Grzegorz Bulaj Journal: Front Pediatr Date: 2018-04-09 Impact factor: 3.418
Authors: Teresa Hagan Thomas; Varshini Sivakumar; Dmitriy Babichenko; Victoria L B Grieve; Mary Lou Klem Journal: JMIR Serious Games Date: 2020-07-30 Impact factor: 4.143
Authors: Anna Aminov; Jeffrey M Rogers; Sandy Middleton; Karen Caeyenberghs; Peter H Wilson Journal: J Neuroeng Rehabil Date: 2018-03-27 Impact factor: 4.262
Authors: Corina Schuster-Amft; Kynan Eng; Zorica Suica; Irene Thaler; Sandra Signer; Isabelle Lehmann; Ludwig Schmid; Michael A McCaskey; Miura Hawkins; Martin L Verra; Daniel Kiper Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-10-24 Impact factor: 3.240