Literature DB >> 26258318

Prospective randomized double-blinded trial comparing 2 anti-MRSA agents with supplemental coverage of cefazolin before lower extremity revascularization.

Patrick A Stone1, Ali F AbuRahma, James R Campbell, Stephen M Hass, Albeir Y Mousa, Aravinda Nanjundappa, Mohit Srivastiva, Asmita Modak, Mary Emmett.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare with antibiotics with methicillin-resistant microbial coverage in a prospective fashion.
BACKGROUND: Current antibiotic prophylaxis for vascular procedures includes a first generation cephalosporin. No changes in recommendations have occurred despite changes in reports of incidence of MRSA related surgical site infections. Does supplemental anti-MRSA prophylactic coverage provide a significant reduction in Gram-positive or MRSA infections?
METHODS: Single center prospective double blinded randomized study of patients undergoing lower extremity vascular procedures from 2011 to 2014. One hundred seventy-eight (178) patients were evaluated at 90 days for surgical site infection. Infections were categorized as early infections less than 30 days of the index procedure and late after 90 days.
RESULTS: Early vascular surgical site infection occurred in 7(8.24%) of patients in the Vancomycin arm, and 11 (11.83%) in the Daptomycin arm (P = 0.43). Gram-positive related infections and MRSA infections occurred in 1(1.18%)/0(0%) of Vancomycin patients and 9 (9.68%)/1 (1.08%) of Daptomycin patients, respectively (P < 0.02 and P = 1.00). Readmissions related to surgical site infections occurred in 4(4.71%) in the Vancomycin group and 11 (11.8%) in the Daptomycin group (P = 0.11). Patients undergoing operative exploration occurred in 5 (5.88%) in the Vancomycin group and 10 (10.75%) of the Daptomycin group (P = 0.17). Late infections were reported in 3 patients, 2 of which were in the combined Daptomycin group. Median hospital charges related to readmissions due to a surgical site infection was $50,823 in the combination Vancomycin arm and $110,920 in the combination Daptomycin group; however, no statistical significance was appreciated (P = 0.11).
CONCLUSIONS: Vancomycin supplemental prophylaxis seems to reduce the incidence of Gram-positive infection compared with adding supplemental Daptomycin prophylaxis. The Incidence of MRSA-related surgical site infections is low with the addition of either anti-MRSA agents compared with historical incidence of MRSA-related infection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26258318      PMCID: PMC4658540          DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001433

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  14 in total

1.  Factors associated with surgical site infection after lower extremity bypass in the Society for Vascular Surgery (SVS) Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI).

Authors:  Jeffrey A Kalish; Alik Farber; Karen Homa; Magdiel Trinidad; Adam Beck; Mark G Davies; Larry W Kraiss; Jack L Cronenwett
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2014-06-20       Impact factor: 4.268

2.  Vascular surgical antibiotic prophylaxis study (VSAPS).

Authors:  Stone Patrick; Campbell James; Aburahma Ali; Safley Lawson; Emmett Mary; Asmita Modak
Journal:  Vasc Endovascular Surg       Date:  2010-07-30       Impact factor: 1.089

3.  Infection in arterial reconstruction with synthetic grafts.

Authors:  D E Szilagyi; R F Smith; J P Elliott; M P Vrandecic
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1972-09       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Prospective, randomized, double-blind trial comparing teicoplanin and cefazolin as antibiotic prophylaxis in prosthetic vascular surgery.

Authors:  M Marroni; P Cao; M Fiorio; M Maghini; M Lenti; A Repetto; F Menichetti
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 3.267

5.  Predictors of surgical site infection after open lower extremity revascularization.

Authors:  David Yu Greenblatt; Victoria Rajamanickam; Matthew W Mell
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2011-03-31       Impact factor: 4.268

6.  Ceftriaxone versus cefazolin in peripheral arterial operations: a randomized, prospective trial.

Authors:  C B Ross; W G Wheeler; M J Jones; C A Kerins; T E Peek
Journal:  South Med J       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 0.954

7.  Cefamandole versus cefazolin in vascular surgical wound infection prophylaxis: cost-effectiveness and risk factors.

Authors:  W H Edwards; A B Kaiser; S Tapper; W H Edwards; R S Martin; J L Mulherin; J M Jenkins; A C Roach
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 4.268

8.  Antibiotic prophylaxis in vascular surgery.

Authors:  A B Kaiser; K R Clayson; J L Mulherin; A C Roach; T R Allen; W H Edwards; W A Dale
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1978-09       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 9.  Vascular surgical site infection: risk factors and preventive measures.

Authors:  Dennis F Bandyk
Journal:  Semin Vasc Surg       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 1.000

10.  Surgical site infections after lower extremity revascularization procedures involving groin incisions.

Authors:  SreyRam Kuy; Anahita Dua; Sapan Desai; Arshish Dua; Bhavin Patel; Nader Tondravi; Gary R Seabrook; Kellie R Brown; Brian D Lewis; Cheong J Lee; SreyReath Kuy; Rishi Subbarayan; Peter J Rossi
Journal:  Ann Vasc Surg       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 1.466

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Groin Surgical Site Infection in Vascular Surgery: Systemic Review on Peri-Operative Antibiotic Prophylaxis.

Authors:  Bruno Amato; Rita Compagna; Salvatore De Vivo; Aldo Rocca; Francesca Carbone; Maurizio Gentile; Roberto Cirocchi; Francesco Squizzato; Andrea Spertino; Piero Battocchio
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-20

Review 2.  New Is Old, and Old Is New: Recent Advances in Antibiotic-Based, Antibiotic-Free and Ethnomedical Treatments against Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Wound Infections.

Authors:  Jian-Lin Dou; Yi-Wei Jiang; Jun-Qiu Xie; Xiao-Gang Zhang
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2016-04-25       Impact factor: 5.923

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.