Michaela M Hell1, Stephan Achenbach2, Annika Schuhbaeck2, Lutz Klinghammer2, Matthias S May3, Mohamed Marwan2. 1. Department of Cardiology, University of Erlangen, Ulmenweg 18, 91054 Erlangen, Germany. Electronic address: michaela.hell@uk-erlangen.de. 2. Department of Cardiology, University of Erlangen, Ulmenweg 18, 91054 Erlangen, Germany. 3. Department of Radiology, University of Erlangen, Maximiliansplatz 1, 91054 Erlangen, Germany.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Pericoronary adipose tissue (PCAT) can promote atherosclerosis. Metabolically active and inactive PCAT may display different CT densities. However, CT density could be influenced by partial volume effects and image interpolation. OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether PCAT density values in CT displays differences that are larger than those attributable to interpolation and partial volume effects, which would manifest themselves through the relationship between PCAT density and distance from the contrast-enhanced coronary lumen. METHODS: PCAT density analysis was performed (417 non-atherosclerotic segments, 63 patients) using dual-source CT with a threshold-based measurement method. Changes in PCAT density values depending on distance from the contrast-enhanced coronary lumen and the influence of cardiovascular risk profile were analyzed. RESULTS: Mean PCAT density was -78.1 ± 5.6 HU. PCAT density decreased from proximal to distal segments in the LAD (-78.0 ± 7.3 vs. -82.4 ± 7.7 HU; p < 0.001). PCAT density was higher close to the lumen compared to more peripheral locations (-76.0 ± 6.7 vs. -78.5 ± 5.4 HU; p < 0.001). Decreasing PCAT density was significantly associated with higher epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) volume and body mass index. There was a trend of lower PCAT values with a family history of coronary artery disease. CONCLUSION: CT-measured attenuation of PCAT is influenced by EAT volume and body mass index. A decrease of PCAT attenuation with increasing distance from the vessel and from proximal to distal segments may suggest variations in CT density of PCAT due to partial volume effects and image interpolation rather than solely due to differences in tissue composition or metabolic activity.
BACKGROUND: Pericoronary adipose tissue (PCAT) can promote atherosclerosis. Metabolically active and inactive PCAT may display different CT densities. However, CT density could be influenced by partial volume effects and image interpolation. OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether PCAT density values in CT displays differences that are larger than those attributable to interpolation and partial volume effects, which would manifest themselves through the relationship between PCAT density and distance from the contrast-enhanced coronary lumen. METHODS: PCAT density analysis was performed (417 non-atherosclerotic segments, 63 patients) using dual-source CT with a threshold-based measurement method. Changes in PCAT density values depending on distance from the contrast-enhanced coronary lumen and the influence of cardiovascular risk profile were analyzed. RESULTS: Mean PCAT density was -78.1 ± 5.6 HU. PCAT density decreased from proximal to distal segments in the LAD (-78.0 ± 7.3 vs. -82.4 ± 7.7 HU; p < 0.001). PCAT density was higher close to the lumen compared to more peripheral locations (-76.0 ± 6.7 vs. -78.5 ± 5.4 HU; p < 0.001). Decreasing PCAT density was significantly associated with higher epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) volume and body mass index. There was a trend of lower PCAT values with a family history of coronary artery disease. CONCLUSION: CT-measured attenuation of PCAT is influenced by EAT volume and body mass index. A decrease of PCAT attenuation with increasing distance from the vessel and from proximal to distal segments may suggest variations in CT density of PCAT due to partial volume effects and image interpolation rather than solely due to differences in tissue composition or metabolic activity.
Authors: Min Yang; Wenrui Bao; Zhihan Xu; Le Qin; Ning Zhang; Fuhua Yan; Wenjie Yang Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2022-02-15 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Jeremy Yuvaraj; William Cameron; Jordan Andrews; Andrew Lin; Nitesh Nerlekar; Stephen J Nicholls; Garun S Hamilton; Dennis T L Wong Journal: Cardiovasc Diagn Ther Date: 2022-02
Authors: Caterina B Monti; Marina Codari; Carlo Nicola De Cecco; Francesco Secchi; Francesco Sardanelli; Arthur E Stillman Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2019-12-11 Impact factor: 3.039
Authors: Carrie Hanley; Kelly J Shields; Karen A Matthews; Maria M Brooks; Imke Janssen; Matthew J Budoff; Akira Sekikawa; Suresh Mulukutla; Samar R El Khoudary Journal: Atherosclerosis Date: 2018-09-08 Impact factor: 5.162
Authors: Andrew Lin; Nitesh Nerlekar; Jeremy Yuvaraj; Katrina Fernandes; Cathy Jiang; Stephen J Nicholls; Damini Dey; Dennis T L Wong Journal: Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2021-02-22 Impact factor: 6.875
Authors: Jeremy Yuvaraj; Kevin Cheng; Andrew Lin; Peter J Psaltis; Stephen J Nicholls; Dennis T L Wong Journal: Cells Date: 2021-05-13 Impact factor: 6.600