Literature DB >> 26255981

On the origins of observations of heterostyly in Primula.

Philip M Gilmartin1,2.   

Abstract

In 1862, Charles Darwin published his landmark study on the different forms of flower in Primula; he coined the term distyly and subsequently expanded his studies to other species, including those with tristyly. Darwin is widely recognized as the first to study pin and thrum flowers in Primula, and to provide an explanation for the functional significance of the two floral morphs. Our laboratory is pursuing the genes that underpin floral heteromorphy in Primula, work influenced by Darwin's observations. One day, while appreciating a print of Primula vulgaris from William Curtis' Flora Londinensis, I was struck by the fact that I was looking at images of dimorphic Primula flowers captured in a late-1700s copper-plate engraving that predated Darwin's observations by over 70 yr. This realization triggered a journey into archives of botanical texts, herbals and florilegia from the 16(th) to 19(th) Centuries, and correspondence archives, in search of earlier documents that could have influenced Darwin and the origins of an idea. Darwin was not the first to observe floral heteromorphy in Primula, but he was the first to realize the significance of the two floral morphs. Darwin's insight and exposition of purpose have underpinned all consequent work on the subject.
© 2015 The Author. New Phytologist © 2015 New Phytologist Trust.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Primula; S locus; floral heteromorphy; flower development; heterostyly

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26255981     DOI: 10.1111/nph.13558

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  New Phytol        ISSN: 0028-646X            Impact factor:   10.151


  7 in total

1.  Presence versus absence of CYP734A50 underlies the style-length dimorphism in primroses.

Authors:  Cuong Nguyen Huu; Christian Kappel; Barbara Keller; Adrien Sicard; Yumiko Takebayashi; Holger Breuninger; Michael D Nowak; Isabel Bäurle; Axel Himmelbach; Michael Burkart; Thomas Ebbing-Lohaus; Hitoshi Sakakibara; Lothar Altschmied; Elena Conti; Michael Lenhard
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2016-09-06       Impact factor: 8.140

2.  De novo Sequencing and Comparative Transcriptomics of Floral Development of the Distylous Species Lithospermum multiflorum.

Authors:  James I Cohen
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2016-12-23       Impact factor: 5.753

3.  Primula vulgaris (primrose) genome assembly, annotation and gene expression, with comparative genomics on the heterostyly supergene.

Authors:  Jonathan M Cocker; Jonathan Wright; Jinhong Li; David Swarbreck; Sarah Dyer; Mario Caccamo; Philip M Gilmartin
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-12-18       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Evolution of Autonomous Selfing in Marginal Habitats: Spatiotemporal Variation in the Floral Traits of the Distylous Primula wannanensis.

Authors:  Wei Zhang; Ying Feng Hu; Xiao He; Wei Zhou; Jian Wen Shao
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2021-12-16       Impact factor: 5.753

5.  Comparative Genomics Elucidates the Origin of a Supergene Controlling Floral Heteromorphism.

Authors:  Giacomo Potente; Étienne Léveillé-Bourret; Narjes Yousefi; Rimjhim Roy Choudhury; Barbara Keller; Seydina Issa Diop; Daniël Duijsings; Walter Pirovano; Michael Lenhard; Péter Szövényi; Elena Conti
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2022-02-03       Impact factor: 16.240

6.  Agrobacterium-mediated transformation systems of Primula vulgaris.

Authors:  Sadiye Hayta; Mark A Smedley; Jinhong Li; Wendy A Harwood; Philip M Gilmartin
Journal:  Plant Methods       Date:  2018-10-26       Impact factor: 4.993

7.  The Genomic Selfing Syndrome Accompanies the Evolutionary Breakdown of Heterostyly.

Authors:  Xin-Jia Wang; Spencer C H Barrett; Li Zhong; Zhi-Kun Wu; De-Zhu Li; Hong Wang; Wei Zhou
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 16.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.