Literature DB >> 26255059

Selection and evolution in the genomic landscape of copy number alterations in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and its progression to invasive carcinoma of ductal/no special type: a meta-analysis.

Swapnil Ulhas Rane1, Hasan Mirza, Anita Grigoriadis, Sarah E Pinder.   

Abstract

Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is a pre-invasive malignancy detected with an increasing frequency through screening mammography. One of the primary aims of therapy is to prevent local recurrence, as in situ or as invasive carcinoma, the latter arising in half of the recurrent cases. Reliable biomarkers predictive of its association with recurrence, particularly as invasive disease, are however lacking. In this study, we perform a meta-analysis of 26 studies which report somatic copy number aberrations (SCNAs) in 288 cases of 'pure' DCIS and 328 of DCIS associated with invasive carcinoma, along with additional unmatched cases of 145 invasive carcinoma of ductal/no special type (IDC) and 50 of atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH). SCNA frequencies across the genome were calculated at cytoband resolution (UCSC genome build 19) to maximally utilize the available information in published literature. Fisher's exact test was used to identify significant differences in the gain-loss distribution in each cytoband in different group comparisons. We found synchronous DCIS to be at a more advanced stage of genetic aberrations than pure DCIS and was very similar to IDC. Differences in gains and losses in each disease process (i.e. invasive or in situ) at each cytoband were used to infer evidence of selection and conservation for each cytoband and to define an evolutionary conservation scale (ECS) as a tool to identify and distinguish driver SCNA from the passenger SCNA. Using ECS, we have identified aberrations that show evidence of selection from the early stages of neoplasia (i.e. in ADH and pure DCIS) and persist in IDC; we postulate these to be driver aberrations and that their presence may predict progression to invasive disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26255059     DOI: 10.1007/s10549-015-3509-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  11 in total

Review 1.  Genomic approaches to accelerate cancer interception.

Authors:  Jennifer Beane; Joshua D Campbell; Julian Lel; Jessica Vick; Avrum Spira
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2017-07-26       Impact factor: 41.316

2.  A P53-Independent DNA Damage Response Suppresses Oncogenic Proliferation and Genome Instability.

Authors:  Katerina D Fagan-Solis; Dennis A Simpson; Rashmi J Kumar; Luciano G Martelotto; Lisle E Mose; Naim U Rashid; Alice Y Ho; Simon N Powell; Y Hannah Wen; Joel S Parker; Jorge S Reis-Filho; John H J Petrini; Gaorav P Gupta
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2020-02-04       Impact factor: 9.423

3.  Mammary epithelial morphogenesis and early breast cancer. Evidence of involvement of basal components of the RNA Polymerase I transcription machinery.

Authors:  Stefano Rossetti; Andrzej J Wierzbicki; Nicoletta Sacchi
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 4.534

Review 4.  Ductal carcinoma in situ of breast: update 2019.

Authors:  Sunil S Badve; Yesim Gökmen-Polar
Journal:  Pathology       Date:  2019-08-28       Impact factor: 5.306

5.  Detection of gene copy number alterations in DCIS and invasive breast cancer by QM-FISH.

Authors:  Aifeng Pan; Yawei Zhou; Kun Mu; Yansong Liu; Feifei Sun; Peng Li; Li Li
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2016-11-15       Impact factor: 4.060

6.  Comparison of HER2 amplification status among breast cancer subgroups offers new insights in pathways of breast cancer progression.

Authors:  Kathleen Lambein; Mieke Van Bockstal; Lies Vandemaele; Rudy Van den Broecke; Veronique Cocquyt; Sofie Geenen; Hannelore Denys; Louis Libbrecht
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 4.064

7.  Whole-Exome Sequencing Analysis of the Progression from Non-Low-Grade Ductal Carcinoma In Situ to Invasive Ductal Carcinoma.

Authors:  Fresia Pareja; David N Brown; Ju Youn Lee; Arnaud Da Cruz Paula; Pier Selenica; Rui Bi; Felipe C Geyer; Andrea Gazzo; Edaise M da Silva; Mahsa Vahdatinia; Anthe A Stylianou; Lorenzo Ferrando; Hannah Y Wen; James B Hicks; Britta Weigelt; Jorge S Reis-Filho
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2020-03-27       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 8.  Ductal Carcinoma in Situ Biomarkers in a Precision Medicine Era: Current and Future Molecular-Based Testing.

Authors:  Kevin Shee; Kristen E Muller; Jonathan Marotti; Todd W Miller; Wendy A Wells; Gregory J Tsongalis
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2018-10-29       Impact factor: 4.307

9.  Genomic landscape of ductal carcinoma in situ and association with progression.

Authors:  Chieh-Yu Lin; Sujay Vennam; Natasha Purington; Eric Lin; Sushama Varma; Summer Han; Manisha Desa; Tina Seto; Nicholas J Wang; Henning Stehr; Megan L Troxell; Allison W Kurian; Robert B West
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2019-08-17       Impact factor: 4.624

Review 10.  A retrospective alternative for active surveillance trials for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.

Authors:  Mieke R Van Bockstal; Marie C Agahozo; Linetta B Koppert; Carolien H M van Deurzen
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2019-05-08       Impact factor: 7.396

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.