Literature DB >> 26254723

Upper Calyx Approachability through a Lower Calyx Access for Prone Versus Supine Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy.

Mario Sofer1, Guido Giusti2, Silvia Proietti2, Ishai Mintz3, Maharan Kabha3, Haim Matzkin3, Galit Aviram4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We assessed the approachability of the upper calyx through lower calyx access for prone and supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy and used computerized tomography to analyze anatomical factors that may influence it.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective series of 45 patients treated with percutaneous nephrolithotomy were operated on in the prone (20) and supine (25) positions. Computerized tomography simulated access to the lower and upper calyx longitudinal axes were used to measure skin-to-lower calyx distance, thickness of the body wall, muscle and fat, the muscle-to-fat thickness ratio and the angle between the lower calyx tract and the upper calyx axis. Intraoperative approachability to the upper calyx was also evaluated.
RESULTS: The upper calyx was successfully approached in 20% of prone and 80% of supine percutaneous nephrolithotomies (p <0.0001). The average skin-to-lower calyx distance was 98.4 mm (range 65.3 to 128.6) in the prone position and 98.7 mm (range 60.8 to 150) in the supine position (p = 0.99). Body wall and muscular thickness, and the muscle-to-fat thickness ratio were significantly lower in supine than prone nephrolithotomy (p <0.001, <0.0005 and <0.05, respectively). The average angle between the lower and upper calyces axes was wide in the supine position (141 degrees, range 90 to 170) and acute in the prone position (84 degrees, range 65 to 110, p <0.05(E-10)).
CONCLUSIONS: Upper calyx endoscopic approachability through the lower calyx is significantly higher in supine than in prone percutaneous nephrolithotomies, possibly due to a thinner body wall, a thinner muscular layer, a lower muscle-to-fat thickness ratio and a wider angle between the lower and upper calyx axes.
Copyright © 2016 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  anatomy; calculi; kidney; nephrostomy; patient positioning; percutaneous; regional

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26254723     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.07.101

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  14 in total

Review 1.  Prone Versus Supine Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: What Is Your Position?

Authors:  Roshan M Patel; Zhamshid Okhunov; Ralph V Clayman; Jaime Landman
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Prospective evaluation of kidney displacement during supine mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy: Incidence, significance, and analysis of predictive factors.

Authors:  Başak Gülpinar; Aykut Akinci; Evren Süer; Adem Sanci; Muammer Babayiğit; Yaşar Bedük; Sümer Baltaci; Mehmet İlker Gökce
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2018-06-08       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 3.  Invited review: the tale of ECIRS (Endoscopic Combined IntraRenal Surgery) in the Galdakao-modified supine Valdivia position.

Authors:  Cesare Marco Scoffone; Cecilia Maria Cracco
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2017-11-30       Impact factor: 3.436

4.  Comparison of supine and prone positions for percutaneous nephrolithotomy in treatment of staghorn stones.

Authors:  Mehmet İlker Gökce; Arif Ibiş; Adem Sancı; Aykut Akıncı; Uygar Bağcı; Eylül Asya Ağaoğlu; Evren Süer; Ömer Gülpınar
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2017-03-29       Impact factor: 3.436

5.  A contemporary lower pole approach for complete staghorn calculi: outcomes and efficacy.

Authors:  Kyle A Blum; Egor Parkhomenko; Julie Thai; Timothy Tran; Mantu Gupta
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-04-03       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 6.  Supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy: tips and tricks.

Authors:  Silvia Proietti; Moises Elias Rodríguez-Socarrás; Brian Eisner; Vincent De Coninck; Mario Sofer; Giuseppe Saitta; Maria Rodriguez-Monsalve; Carlo D'Orta; Piera Bellinzoni; Franco Gaboardi; Guido Giusti
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2019-09

7.  PCNL: understanding the beauty of the supine position.

Authors:  Mario Sofer
Journal:  Cent European J Urol       Date:  2017-03-14

8.  Implementation of supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a novel position for an old operation.

Authors:  Mario Sofer; Eli Tavdi; Oleg Levi; Ishay Mintz; Yuval Bar-Yosef; Ami Sidi; Haim Matzkin; Alexander Tsivian
Journal:  Cent European J Urol       Date:  2017-03-14

9.  Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in complete supine flank-free position in comparison to prone position: A single-centre experience.

Authors:  Nadeem Sohail; Amjad Albodour; Khalid Mohammed Abdelrahman
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2016-10-31

Review 10.  Patient positioning during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: what is the current best practice?

Authors:  Panagiotis Mourmouris; Marinos Berdempes; Titos Markopoulos; Lazaros Lazarou; Lazaros Tzelves; Andreas Skolarikos
Journal:  Res Rep Urol       Date:  2018-10-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.