PURPOSE: We investigate whether ocular and person-based characteristics were associated with dark adaptation (DA). DESIGN: Cross-sectional, single-center, observational study. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred sixteen participants older than 50 years of age with a range of age-related macular degeneration (AMD) severity. METHODS: Participants underwent best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) testing, ophthalmoscopic examination, and multimodal imaging. Presence of reticular pseudodrusen (RPD) was assessed by masked grading of fundus images and was confirmed with optical coherence tomography. Eyes also were graded for AMD features (drusen, pigmentary changes, late AMD) to generate person-based AMD severity groups. One eye was designated the study eye for DA testing. Nonparametric statistical testing was performed on all comparisons. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome of this study was the rod intercept time (RIT), which is defined as the time for a participant's visual sensitivity to recover to a stimulus intensity of 5×10(-3) cd/m(2) (a decrease of 3 log units), or until a maximum test duration of 40 minutes was reached. RESULTS: A total of 116 study eyes from 116 participants (mean age, 75.4±9.4 years; 58% female) were analyzed. Increased RIT was associated significantly with increasing AMD severity, increasing age (r = 0.34; P = 0.0002), decreasing BCVA (r = -0.54; P < 0.0001), pseudophakia (P = 0.03), and decreasing subfoveal choroidal thickness (r = -0.27; P = 0.003). Study eyes with RPD (15/116 [13%]) had a significantly greater mean RIT compared with eyes without RPD in any AMD severity group (P < 0.02 for all comparisons), with 80% reaching the DA test ceiling. CONCLUSIONS: Impairments in DA increased with age, worse visual acuity, presence of RPD, AMD severity, and decreased subfoveal choroidal thickness. Analysis of covariance found the multivariate model that best fit the data included age, AMD group, and presence of RPD (R(2) = 0.56), with the presence of RPD conferring the largest parameter estimate.
PURPOSE: We investigate whether ocular and person-based characteristics were associated with dark adaptation (DA). DESIGN: Cross-sectional, single-center, observational study. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred sixteen participants older than 50 years of age with a range of age-related macular degeneration (AMD) severity. METHODS:Participants underwent best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) testing, ophthalmoscopic examination, and multimodal imaging. Presence of reticular pseudodrusen (RPD) was assessed by masked grading of fundus images and was confirmed with optical coherence tomography. Eyes also were graded for AMD features (drusen, pigmentary changes, late AMD) to generate person-based AMD severity groups. One eye was designated the study eye for DA testing. Nonparametric statistical testing was performed on all comparisons. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome of this study was the rod intercept time (RIT), which is defined as the time for a participant's visual sensitivity to recover to a stimulus intensity of 5×10(-3) cd/m(2) (a decrease of 3 log units), or until a maximum test duration of 40 minutes was reached. RESULTS: A total of 116 study eyes from 116 participants (mean age, 75.4±9.4 years; 58% female) were analyzed. Increased RIT was associated significantly with increasing AMD severity, increasing age (r = 0.34; P = 0.0002), decreasing BCVA (r = -0.54; P < 0.0001), pseudophakia (P = 0.03), and decreasing subfoveal choroidal thickness (r = -0.27; P = 0.003). Study eyes with RPD (15/116 [13%]) had a significantly greater mean RIT compared with eyes without RPD in any AMD severity group (P < 0.02 for all comparisons), with 80% reaching the DA test ceiling. CONCLUSIONS: Impairments in DA increased with age, worse visual acuity, presence of RPD, AMD severity, and decreased subfoveal choroidal thickness. Analysis of covariance found the multivariate model that best fit the data included age, AMD group, and presence of RPD (R(2) = 0.56), with the presence of RPD conferring the largest parameter estimate.
Authors: Sina Farsiu; Stephanie J Chiu; Rachelle V O'Connell; Francisco A Folgar; Eric Yuan; Joseph A Izatt; Cynthia A Toth Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2013-08-29 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Gregory R Jackson; Ingrid U Scott; Ivana K Kim; David A Quillen; Alessandro Iannaccone; John G Edwards Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2014-03-10 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Noemi Lois; Sarah L Owens; Rosa Coco; Jill Hopkins; Frederick W Fitzke; Alan C Bird Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2002-03 Impact factor: 5.258
Authors: R Theodore Smith; Jackie K Chan; Mihai Busuoic; Vasuki Sivagnanavel; Alan C Bird; N Victor Chong Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2006-12 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: David Neely; Anna V Zarubina; Mark E Clark; Carrie E Huisingh; Gregory R Jackson; Yuhua Zhang; Gerald McGwin; Christine A Curcio; Cynthia Owsley Journal: Retina Date: 2017-07 Impact factor: 4.256
Authors: Yuhua Zhang; Xiaolin Wang; Pooja Godara; Tianjiao Zhang; Mark E Clark; C Douglas Witherspoon; Richard F Spaide; Cynthia Owsley; Christine A Curcio Journal: Retina Date: 2018-01 Impact factor: 4.256
Authors: Maximilian Pfau; Moritz Lindner; Martin Gliem; Julia S Steinberg; Sarah Thiele; Robert P Finger; Monika Fleckenstein; Frank G Holz; Steffen Schmitz-Valckenberg Journal: Eye (Lond) Date: 2018-08-01 Impact factor: 3.775
Authors: Yuhua Zhang; Xiaolin Wang; Srinivas R Sadda; Mark E Clark; C Douglas Witherspoon; Richard F Spaide; Cynthia Owsley; Christine A Curcio Journal: Ophthalmol Retina Date: 2019-10-31
Authors: Anna V Zarubina; David C Neely; Mark E Clark; Carrie E Huisingh; Brian C Samuels; Yuhua Zhang; Gerald McGwin; Cynthia Owsley; Christine A Curcio Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2016-02-10 Impact factor: 12.079