Christopher W Pavitt1,2, Katie Harron3, Alistair C Lindsay1, Sayeh Zielke2, Robin Ray1, Daniel Gordon4, Michael B Rubens2, Simon P Padley2,5, Edward D Nicol6,7,8. 1. Department of Cardiology, Royal Brompton Hospital, Sydney Street, London, SW3 6NP, UK. 2. Department of Radiology, Royal Brompton Hospital, Sydney Street, London, SW3 6NP, UK. 3. Centre for Paediatric Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Institute of Child Health, UCL, London, WC1N 1EH, UK. 4. Department of Physics, Royal Marsden Hospital, Fulham Rd, London, SW3 6JJ, UK. 5. Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College, London, SW7 2AZ, UK. 6. Department of Cardiology, Royal Brompton Hospital, Sydney Street, London, SW3 6NP, UK. e.nicol@rbht.nhs.uk. 7. Department of Radiology, Royal Brompton Hospital, Sydney Street, London, SW3 6NP, UK. e.nicol@rbht.nhs.uk. 8. Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College, London, SW7 2AZ, UK. e.nicol@rbht.nhs.uk.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: We validate a novel CT coronary angiography (CCTA) coronary calcium scoring system. METHODS: Calcium was quantified on CCTA images using a new patient-specific attenuation threshold: mean + 2SD of intra-coronary contrast density (HU). Using 335 patient data sets a conversion factor (CF) for predicting CACS from CCTA scores (CCTAS) was derived and validated in a separate cohort (n = 168). Bland-Altman analysis and weighted kappa for MESA centiles and Agatston risk groupings were calculated. RESULTS: Multivariable linear regression yielded a CF: CACS = (1.185 × CCTAS) + (0.002 × CCTAS × attenuation threshold). When applied to CCTA data sets there was excellent correlation (r = 0.95; p < 0.0001) and agreement (mean difference -10.4 [95% limits of agreement -258.9 to 238.1]) with traditional calcium scores. Agreement was better for calcium scores below 500; however, MESA percentile agreement was better for high risk patients. Risk stratification was excellent (Agatston groups k = 0.88 and MESA centiles k = 0.91). Eliminating the dedicated CACS scan decreased patient radiation exposure by approximately one-third. CONCLUSION: CCTA calcium scores can accurately predict CACS using a simple, individualized, semiautomated approach reducing acquisition time and radiation exposure when evaluating patients for CAD. This method is not affected by the ROI location, imaging protocol, or tube voltage strengthening its clinical applicability. KEY POINTS: • Coronary calcium scores can be reliably determined on contrast-enhanced cardiac CT • This score can accurately risk stratify patients • Elimination of a dedicated calcium scan reduces patient radiation by a third.
OBJECTIVES: We validate a novel CT coronary angiography (CCTA) coronary calcium scoring system. METHODS:Calcium was quantified on CCTA images using a new patient-specific attenuation threshold: mean + 2SD of intra-coronary contrast density (HU). Using 335 patient data sets a conversion factor (CF) for predicting CACS from CCTA scores (CCTAS) was derived and validated in a separate cohort (n = 168). Bland-Altman analysis and weighted kappa for MESA centiles and Agatston risk groupings were calculated. RESULTS: Multivariable linear regression yielded a CF: CACS = (1.185 × CCTAS) + (0.002 × CCTAS × attenuation threshold). When applied to CCTA data sets there was excellent correlation (r = 0.95; p < 0.0001) and agreement (mean difference -10.4 [95% limits of agreement -258.9 to 238.1]) with traditional calcium scores. Agreement was better for calcium scores below 500; however, MESA percentile agreement was better for high risk patients. Risk stratification was excellent (Agatston groups k = 0.88 and MESA centiles k = 0.91). Eliminating the dedicated CACS scan decreased patient radiation exposure by approximately one-third. CONCLUSION:CCTAcalcium scores can accurately predict CACS using a simple, individualized, semiautomated approach reducing acquisition time and radiation exposure when evaluating patients for CAD. This method is not affected by the ROI location, imaging protocol, or tube voltage strengthening its clinical applicability. KEY POINTS: • Coronary calcium scores can be reliably determined on contrast-enhanced cardiac CT • This score can accurately risk stratify patients • Elimination of a dedicated calcium scan reduces patient radiation by a third.
Authors: James M Otton; Jacob T Lønborg; David Boshell; Michael Feneley; Andrew Hayen; Neville Sammel; Ken Sesel; Lourens Bester; Jane McCrohon Journal: J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr Date: 2011-11-20
Authors: James K Min; Allison Dunning; Fay Y Lin; Stephan Achenbach; Mouaz Al-Mallah; Matthew J Budoff; Filippo Cademartiri; Tracy Q Callister; Hyuk-Jae Chang; Victor Cheng; Kavitha Chinnaiyan; Benjamin J W Chow; Augustin Delago; Martin Hadamitzky; Joerg Hausleiter; Philipp Kaufmann; Erica Maffei; Gilbert Raff; Leslee J Shaw; Todd Villines; Daniel S Berman Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2011-08-16 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Matthew J Budoff; Leslee J Shaw; Sandy T Liu; Steven R Weinstein; Tristen P Mosler; Philip H Tseng; Ferdinand R Flores; Tracy Q Callister; Paolo Raggi; Daniel S Berman Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2007-04-20 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Ullrich Ebersberger; Dov Eilot; Roman Goldenberg; Alon Lev; J Reid Spears; Garrett W Rowe; Nicholas Y Gallagher; William T Halligan; Philipp Blanke; Marcus R Makowski; Aleksander W Krazinski; Justin R Silverman; Fabian Bamberg; Alexander W Leber; Ellen Hoffmann; U Joseph Schoepf Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2012-09-16 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Leslee J Shaw; Jörg Hausleiter; Stephan Achenbach; Mouaz Al-Mallah; Daniel S Berman; Matthew J Budoff; Fillippo Cademartiri; Tracy Q Callister; Hyuk-Jae Chang; Yong-Jin Kim; Victor Y Cheng; Benjamin J W Chow; Ricardo C Cury; Augustin J Delago; Allison L Dunning; Gudrun M Feuchtner; Martin Hadamitzky; Ronald P Karlsberg; Philipp A Kaufmann; Jonathon Leipsic; Fay Y Lin; Kavitha M Chinnaiyan; Erica Maffei; Gilbert L Raff; Todd C Villines; Troy Labounty; Millie J Gomez; James K Min Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2012-10-17 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Gary Gray; Eddie D Davenport; Dennis Bron; Rienk Rienks; Joanna d'Arcy; Norbert Guettler; Olivier Manen; Thomas Syburra; Edward D Nicol Journal: Heart Date: 2019-01 Impact factor: 5.994