Literature DB >> 26252072

How are bodies special? Effects of body features on spatial reasoning.

Alfred B Yu1,2, Jeffrey M Zacks2.   

Abstract

Embodied views of cognition argue that cognitive processes are influenced by bodily experience. This implies that when people make spatial judgments about human bodies, they bring to bear embodied knowledge that affects spatial reasoning performance. Here, we examined the specific contribution to spatial reasoning of visual features associated with the human body. We used two different tasks to elicit distinct visuospatial transformations: object-based transformations, as elicited in typical mental rotation tasks, and perspective transformations, used in tasks in which people deliberately adopt the egocentric perspective of another person. Body features facilitated performance in both tasks. This result suggests that observers are particularly sensitive to the presence of a human head and body, and that these features allow observers to quickly recognize and encode the spatial configuration of a figure. Contrary to prior reports, this facilitation was not related to the transformation component of task performance. These results suggest that body features facilitate task components other than spatial transformation, including the encoding of stimulus orientation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Mental imagery; Perspective taking; Spatial transformations

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26252072      PMCID: PMC4792708          DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2015.1079225

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)        ISSN: 1747-0218            Impact factor:   2.143


  25 in total

1.  The role of animacy in spatial transformations.

Authors:  Alfred B Yu; Jeffrey M Zacks
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-10

2.  The body-inversion effect.

Authors:  Catherine L Reed; Valerie E Stone; Senia Bozova; James Tanaka
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2003-07

3.  Mental transformations and visual comparison processes: effects of complexity and similarity.

Authors:  L A Cooper
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1976-11       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  It's all in your head: why is the body inversion effect abolished for headless bodies?

Authors:  Galit Yovel; Tatiana Pelc; Ida Lubetzky
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Separating mental transformations and spatial compatibility effects in the own body transformation task.

Authors:  Mark May; Mike Wendt
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2012-08

6.  Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects.

Authors:  R N Shepard; J Metzler
Journal:  Science       Date:  1971-02-19       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Parallel visual search and rapid animal detection in natural scenes.

Authors:  Jan Drewes; Julia Trommershäuser; Karl R Gegenfurtner
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-02-25       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  Mirror-image confusions: Implications for representation and processing of object orientation.

Authors:  Emma Gregory; Michael McCloskey
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2010-05-13

9.  Updating after rotational and translational body movements: coordinate structure of perspective space.

Authors:  C C Presson; D R Montello
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 1.490

10.  The Two Forms of Visuo-Spatial Perspective Taking are Differently Embodied and Subserve Different Spatial Prepositions.

Authors:  Klaus Kessler; Hannah Rutherford
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2010-12-06
View more
  1 in total

1.  Selective Effects of Sport Expertise on the Stages of Mental Rotation Tasks With Object-Based and Egocentric Transformations.

Authors:  Tian Feng; Zhongqiu Zhang; Zhiguang Ji; Binbin Jia; Yawei Li
Journal:  Adv Cogn Psychol       Date:  2017-09-30
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.