Literature DB >> 20921110

The role of animacy in spatial transformations.

Alfred B Yu1, Jeffrey M Zacks.   

Abstract

We present evidence that different mental spatial transformations are used to reason about three different types of items representing a spectrum of animacy: human bodies, nonhuman animals, and inanimate objects. Participants made two different judgments about rotated figures: handedness judgments ("Is this the left or right side?") and matching judgments ("Are these figures the same?"). Perspective-taking strategies were most prevalent when participants made handedness judgments about human bodies and animals. In contrast, participants generally did not imagine changes in perspective to perform matching judgments. Such results suggest that high-level information about semantic categories, including information about a thing's animacy, can influence how spatial representations are transformed when performing online problem solving. Supplemental materials for this article may be downloaded from http://mc.psychonomic-journals.org/content/supplemental.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20921110     DOI: 10.3758/MC.38.7.982

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  23 in total

1.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation of primary motor cortex affects mental rotation.

Authors:  G Ganis; J P Keenan; S M Kosslyn; A Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 5.357

2.  Parietal lobe contribution to mental rotation demonstrated with rTMS.

Authors:  Irina M Harris; Carlo Miniussi
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2003-04-01       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Magnetic stimulation of extrastriate body area impairs visual processing of nonfacial body parts.

Authors:  Cosimo Urgesi; Giovanni Berlucchi; Salvatore M Aglioti
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2004-12-14       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 4.  The power of simulation: imagining one's own and other's behavior.

Authors:  Jean Decety; Julie Grèzes
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2006-02-07       Impact factor: 3.252

5.  Configural processing in the perception of apparent biological motion.

Authors:  S H Chatterjee; J J Freyd; M Shiffrar
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Updating displays after imagined object and viewer rotations.

Authors:  M Wraga; S H Creem; D R Proffitt
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects.

Authors:  R N Shepard; J Metzler
Journal:  Science       Date:  1971-02-19       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Spatial perspective-taking in conversation.

Authors:  M F Schober
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1993-04

9.  Selective disturbance of mental rotation by cortical stimulation.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Zacks; Frank Gilliam; Jeffrey G Ojemann
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.139

10.  Neural correlates of first-person perspective as one constituent of human self-consciousness.

Authors:  K Vogeley; M May; A Ritzl; P Falkai; K Zilles; G R Fink
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.225

View more
  7 in total

1.  On the relation between spontaneous perspective taking and other visuospatial processes.

Authors:  Jan Zwickel; Hermann J Müller
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2013-05

2.  Transformations and representations supporting spatial perspective taking.

Authors:  Alfred B Yu; Jeffrey M Zacks
Journal:  Spat Cogn Comput       Date:  2017-06-01

3.  Spatial transformations of bodies and objects in adults with autism spectrum disorder.

Authors:  Amy Pearson; Lauren Marsh; Antonia Hamilton; Danielle Ropar
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2014-09

4.  How are bodies special? Effects of body features on spatial reasoning.

Authors:  Alfred B Yu; Jeffrey M Zacks
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2015-09-22       Impact factor: 2.143

Review 5.  A review of visual perspective taking in autism spectrum disorder.

Authors:  Amy Pearson; Danielle Ropar; Antonia F de C Hamilton
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-10-08       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  Reference Frames and 3-D Shape Perception of Pictured Objects: On Verticality and Viewpoint-From-Above.

Authors:  Els V K Cornelis; Andrea J van Doorn; Johan Wagemans
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2016-06-29

Review 7.  Visual perspective taking and laterality decisions: Problems and possible solutions.

Authors:  Mark May; Mike Wendt
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-09-06       Impact factor: 3.169

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.