Seemant Chaturvedi1, Tanya N Turan2, Michael J Lynn2, Colin P Derdeyn2, David Fiorella2, L Scott Janis2, Marc I Chimowitz2. 1. From the Department of Neurology, University of Miami, Miami, FL (S.C.); Department of Neurosciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC (T.N.T., M.I.C.); Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Emory University Rollins School of Public Health, Atlanta, GA (M.J.L.); Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology and the Departments of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis MO (C.P.D.); Department of Neurosurgery, State University of New York, Stony Brook, NY (D.F.); and National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institute of Health, Bethesda, MD (L.S.J.). SChaturvedi@med.miami.edu. 2. From the Department of Neurology, University of Miami, Miami, FL (S.C.); Department of Neurosciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC (T.N.T., M.I.C.); Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Emory University Rollins School of Public Health, Atlanta, GA (M.J.L.); Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology and the Departments of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis MO (C.P.D.); Department of Neurosurgery, State University of New York, Stony Brook, NY (D.F.); and National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institute of Health, Bethesda, MD (L.S.J.).
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The Stenting and Aggressive Medical Management for Preventing Recurrent Stroke in Intracranial Stenosis (SAMMPRIS) medical group had a much lower primary end point rate than predicted from the preceding Warfarin Aspirin Symptomatic Intracranial Disease (WASID) trial. This result has been attributed to the aggressive medical therapy used in SAMMPRIS, but an alternative hypothesis is that SAMMPRIS patients were at lower risk. We undertook analyses to evaluate these competing hypotheses. METHODS: Using proportional hazards regression, we compared the SAMMPRIS primary end point between SAMMPRIS medical patients and WASID patients meeting the same qualifying criteria adjusted for confounding baseline characteristics. RESULTS: The unadjusted comparison of the SAMMPRIS primary end point showed a significantly higher risk for WASID patients (P=0.009, logrank test) with 12 month Kaplan-Meier estimates of 21.9% in WASID and 12.6% in SAMMPRIS and hazard ratio 1.9 (95% confidence interval =1.2-3.0). The analyses identified the following confounding factors that varied between the studies and that conferred a higher risk: lack of statin use at enrollment (hazard ratio =1.8, 95% confidence interval =1.1-2.9, P=0.027) that was more prevalent among WASID patients (39% versus 14%, P<0.0001) and prior infarcts in the territory of the symptomatic vessel (hazard ratio =1.8, 95% confidence interval =1.1-2.9, P=0.023) that was more prevalent among SAMMPRIS patients (34% versus 22%, P=0.015).The hazard ratio for WASID versus SAMMPRIS adjusted for these 2 characteristics was 1.9 (95% confidence interval =1.1-3.2). CONCLUSIONS: After adjustment for confounding baseline characteristics, WASID patients had an almost 2-fold higher risk of the SAMMPRIS primary end point, which supports the hypothesis that the lower rate of the primary end point in the medical arm of SAMMPRIS compared with WASID patients was as a result of the aggressive medical management used in SAMMPRIS. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00576693.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The Stenting and Aggressive Medical Management for Preventing Recurrent Stroke in Intracranial Stenosis (SAMMPRIS) medical group had a much lower primary end point rate than predicted from the preceding WarfarinAspirin Symptomatic Intracranial Disease (WASID) trial. This result has been attributed to the aggressive medical therapy used in SAMMPRIS, but an alternative hypothesis is that SAMMPRIS patients were at lower risk. We undertook analyses to evaluate these competing hypotheses. METHODS: Using proportional hazards regression, we compared the SAMMPRIS primary end point between SAMMPRIS medical patients and WASID patients meeting the same qualifying criteria adjusted for confounding baseline characteristics. RESULTS: The unadjusted comparison of the SAMMPRIS primary end point showed a significantly higher risk for WASID patients (P=0.009, logrank test) with 12 month Kaplan-Meier estimates of 21.9% in WASID and 12.6% in SAMMPRIS and hazard ratio 1.9 (95% confidence interval =1.2-3.0). The analyses identified the following confounding factors that varied between the studies and that conferred a higher risk: lack of statin use at enrollment (hazard ratio =1.8, 95% confidence interval =1.1-2.9, P=0.027) that was more prevalent among WASID patients (39% versus 14%, P<0.0001) and prior infarcts in the territory of the symptomatic vessel (hazard ratio =1.8, 95% confidence interval =1.1-2.9, P=0.023) that was more prevalent among SAMMPRIS patients (34% versus 22%, P=0.015).The hazard ratio for WASID versus SAMMPRIS adjusted for these 2 characteristics was 1.9 (95% confidence interval =1.1-3.2). CONCLUSIONS: After adjustment for confounding baseline characteristics, WASID patients had an almost 2-fold higher risk of the SAMMPRIS primary end point, which supports the hypothesis that the lower rate of the primary end point in the medical arm of SAMMPRIS compared with WASID patients was as a result of the aggressive medical management used in SAMMPRIS. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00576693.
Authors: Scott E Kasner; Marc I Chimowitz; Michael J Lynn; Harriet Howlett-Smith; Barney J Stern; Vicki S Hertzberg; Michael R Frankel; Steven R Levine; Seemant Chaturvedi; Curtis G Benesch; Cathy A Sila; Tudor G Jovin; Jose G Romano; Harry J Cloft Journal: Circulation Date: 2006-01-23 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: S Chaturvedi; T N Turan; M J Lynn; S E Kasner; J Romano; G Cotsonis; M Frankel; M I Chimowitz Journal: Neurology Date: 2007-11-27 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Marc I Chimowitz; Michael J Lynn; Tanya N Turan; David Fiorella; Bethany F Lane; Scott Janis; Colin P Derdeyn Journal: J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis Date: 2011 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 2.136
Authors: Marc I Chimowitz; Michael J Lynn; Harriet Howlett-Smith; Barney J Stern; Vicki S Hertzberg; Michael R Frankel; Steven R Levine; Seemant Chaturvedi; Scott E Kasner; Curtis G Benesch; Cathy A Sila; Tudor G Jovin; Jose G Romano Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2005-03-31 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Tanya N Turan; Michael J Lynn; Azhar Nizam; Bethany Lane; Brent M Egan; Ngoc-Anh Le; Maria F Lopes-Virella; Kathie L Hermayer; Oscar Benavente; Carole L White; W Virgil Brown; Michelle F Caskey; Meghan R Steiner; Nicole Vilardo; Andrew Stufflebean; Colin P Derdeyn; David Fiorella; Scott Janis; Marc I Chimowitz Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes Date: 2012-09-01
Authors: Marc I Chimowitz; Michael J Lynn; Colin P Derdeyn; Tanya N Turan; David Fiorella; Bethany F Lane; L Scott Janis; Helmi L Lutsep; Stanley L Barnwell; Michael F Waters; Brian L Hoh; J Maurice Hourihane; Elad I Levy; Andrei V Alexandrov; Mark R Harrigan; David Chiu; Richard P Klucznik; Joni M Clark; Cameron G McDougall; Mark D Johnson; G Lee Pride; Michel T Torbey; Osama O Zaidat; Zoran Rumboldt; Harry J Cloft Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2011-09-07 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Aram V Chobanian; George L Bakris; Henry R Black; William C Cushman; Lee A Green; Joseph L Izzo; Daniel W Jones; Barry J Materson; Suzanne Oparil; Jackson T Wright; Edward J Roccella Journal: JAMA Date: 2003-05-14 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Tanya N Turan; George Cotsonis; Michael J Lynn; Seemant Chaturvedi; Marc Chimowitz Journal: Circulation Date: 2007-05-21 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Shyam Prabhakaran; David S Liebeskind; George Cotsonis; Azhar Nizam; Edward Feldmann; Rajbeer S Sangha; Iszet Campo-Bustillo; Jose G Romano Journal: J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis Date: 2021-10-26 Impact factor: 2.136
Authors: Marios Psychogios; Alex Brehm; Elena López-Cancio; Gian Marco De Marchis; Elena Meseguer; Aristeidis H Katsanos; Christine Kremer; Peter Sporns; Marialuisa Zedde; Adam Kobayashi; Jildaz Caroff; Daniel Bos; Sabrina Lémeret; Avtar Lal; Juan F Arenillas Journal: Eur Stroke J Date: 2022-06-03
Authors: Ido R van den Wijngaard; Ghislaine Holswilder; Marianne A A van Walderveen; Ale Algra; Marieke J H Wermer; Osama O Zaidat; Jelis Boiten Journal: Brain Behav Date: 2016-08-31 Impact factor: 2.708
Authors: Robert Hurford; Frank J Wolters; Linxin Li; Kui Kai Lau; Wilhelm Küker; Peter M Rothwell Journal: Lancet Neurol Date: 2020-05 Impact factor: 44.182