Literature DB >> 17515467

Relationship between blood pressure and stroke recurrence in patients with intracranial arterial stenosis.

Tanya N Turan1, George Cotsonis, Michael J Lynn, Seemant Chaturvedi, Marc Chimowitz.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Many clinicians allow blood pressure to run high in patients with intracranial stenosis to protect against hypoperfusion. We sought to determine whether higher blood pressure decreases the risk of stroke in these patients. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Data on 567 patients in the Warfarin-Aspirin Symptomatic Intracranial Disease (WASID) trial were analyzed. Time to ischemic stroke and stroke in the same territory of the stenotic vessel was compared in patients grouped by mean systolic blood pressure (SBP) and mean diastolic blood pressure (DBP) during the study. Additional analyses were based on severity and location of stenosis. Ischemic stroke risk increased with increasing mean SBP and DBP on univariate analysis (P<0.0001, P<0.0001) and after adjustment for risk factors (P=0.0008, P<0.0001). Elevated mean SBP and DBP also resulted in increased risk of stroke in the territory in univariate (P=0.0065, P<0.0001) and adjusted (P=0.0002, P=0.0005) analyses. The increased risk of stroke with increasing SBP was driven largely by patients in the highest SBP group. Patients with moderate (< 70%) stenosis had increased risk of stroke (P<0.0001, P=0.003) and stroke in the territory (P=0.0002, P=0.010) with increased SBP and DBP. Patients with severe (> or = 70%) stenosis had increased risk of stroke and stroke in the territory with elevated DBP (P=0.004, P=0.004).
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with intracranial stenosis, higher blood pressure is associated with increased (not decreased) risk of ischemic stroke and stroke in the territory of the stenotic vessel. These findings argue strongly against the common clinical practice of maintaining high blood pressure in patients with intracranial stenosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17515467     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.622464

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  49 in total

Review 1.  Symptomatic intracranial arterial disease: incidence, natural history, diagnosis, and management.

Authors:  Ananth K Vellimana; Andria L Ford; Jin-Moo Lee; Colin P Derdeyn; Gregory J Zipfel
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 4.047

Review 2.  Current diagnosis and management of symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic disease.

Authors:  Shyam Prabhakaran; Jose G Romano
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurol       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 5.710

3.  The challenges of intracranial atherosclerotic disease.

Authors:  Adnan I Qureshi
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Neurol       Date:  2008-04

Review 4.  Revascularization of collaterals for hemodynamic stroke: insight on pathophysiology from the carotid occlusion surgery study.

Authors:  Jose G Romano; David S Liebeskind
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 7.914

Review 5.  Large Artery Atherosclerotic Occlusive Disease.

Authors:  John W Cole
Journal:  Continuum (Minneap Minn)       Date:  2017-02

Review 6.  Stroke Caused by Atherosclerosis of the Major Intracranial Arteries.

Authors:  Chirantan Banerjee; Marc I Chimowitz
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2017-02-03       Impact factor: 17.367

Review 7.  [Difficult decisions in stroke therapy].

Authors:  M Endres; M Grond; W Hacke; M Ebinger; P D Schellinger; M Dichgans
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 1.214

Review 8.  Intracranial atherosclerotic disease.

Authors:  Yuan Wang; Ran Meng; Gang Liu; Catherine Cao; Fenghua Chen; Kunlin Jin; Xunming Ji; Guodong Cao
Journal:  Neurobiol Dis       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 5.996

9.  Frequency, Risk Factors, and Outcome of Coexistent Small Vessel Disease and Intracranial Arterial Stenosis: Results From the Stenting and Aggressive Medical Management for Preventing Recurrent Stroke in Intracranial Stenosis (SAMMPRIS) Trial.

Authors:  Hyung-Min Kwon; Michael J Lynn; Tanya N Turan; Colin P Derdeyn; David Fiorella; Bethany F Lane; Jean Montgomery; L Scott Janis; Zoran Rumboldt; Marc I Chimowitz
Journal:  JAMA Neurol       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 18.302

10.  Do Patient Characteristics Explain the Differences in Outcome Between Medically Treated Patients in SAMMPRIS and WASID?

Authors:  Seemant Chaturvedi; Tanya N Turan; Michael J Lynn; Colin P Derdeyn; David Fiorella; L Scott Janis; Marc I Chimowitz
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2015-08-06       Impact factor: 7.914

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.