Literature DB >> 26249177

Recommendations for Benchmarking Preclinical Studies of Nanomedicines.

Charlene M Dawidczyk1, Luisa M Russell1, Peter C Searson2.   

Abstract

Nanoparticle-based delivery systems provide new opportunities to overcome the limitations associated with traditional small-molecule drug therapy for cancer and to achieve both therapeutic and diagnostic functions in the same platform. Preclinical trials are generally designed to assess therapeutic potential and not to optimize the design of the delivery platform. Consequently, progress in developing design rules for cancer nanomedicines has been slow, hindering progress in the field. Despite the large number of preclinical trials, several factors restrict comparison and benchmarking of different platforms, including variability in experimental design, reporting of results, and the lack of quantitative data. To solve this problem, we review the variables involved in the design of preclinical trials and propose a protocol for benchmarking that we recommend be included in in vivo preclinical studies of drug-delivery platforms for cancer therapy. This strategy will contribute to building the scientific knowledge base that enables development of design rules and accelerates the translation of new technologies. ©2015 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26249177      PMCID: PMC4592474          DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-15-1558

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Res        ISSN: 0008-5472            Impact factor:   12.701


  22 in total

1.  Mechanisms of hepatic disposition of polystyrene microspheres in rats: effects of serum depend on the sizes of microspheres.

Authors:  K Ogawara; M Yoshida; J Kubo; M Nishikawa; Y Takakura; M Hashida; K Higaki; T Kimura
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  1999-09-20       Impact factor: 9.776

Review 2.  Nanotechnology for the biologist.

Authors:  Scott E McNeil
Journal:  J Leukoc Biol       Date:  2005-05-27       Impact factor: 4.962

Review 3.  Lost in translation: animal models and clinical trials in cancer treatment.

Authors:  Isabella Wy Mak; Nathan Evaniew; Michelle Ghert
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 4.060

Review 4.  Timeline: Chemotherapy and the war on cancer.

Authors:  Bruce A Chabner; Thomas G Roberts
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 60.716

Review 5.  State-of-the-art in design rules for drug delivery platforms: lessons learned from FDA-approved nanomedicines.

Authors:  Charlene M Dawidczyk; Chloe Kim; Jea Ho Park; Luisa M Russell; Kwan Hyi Lee; Martin G Pomper; Peter C Searson
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2014-05-27       Impact factor: 9.776

6.  A history of cancer chemotherapy.

Authors:  Vincent T DeVita; Edward Chu
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2008-11-01       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 7.  Nanomaterial standards for efficacy and toxicity assessment.

Authors:  Pavan P Adiseshaiah; Jennifer B Hall; Scott E McNeil
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol       Date:  2010 Jan-Feb

Review 8.  Nanocarriers as an emerging platform for cancer therapy.

Authors:  Dan Peer; Jeffrey M Karp; Seungpyo Hong; Omid C Farokhzad; Rimona Margalit; Robert Langer
Journal:  Nat Nanotechnol       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 39.213

Review 9.  Nanoparticle therapeutics: an emerging treatment modality for cancer.

Authors:  Mark E Davis; Zhuo Georgia Chen; Dong M Shin
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 84.694

Review 10.  Animal models and therapeutic molecular targets of cancer: utility and limitations.

Authors:  Maria Cekanova; Kusum Rathore
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2014-10-14       Impact factor: 4.162

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Minimum information reporting in bio-nano experimental literature.

Authors:  Matthew Faria; Mattias Björnmalm; Kristofer J Thurecht; Stephen J Kent; Robert G Parton; Maria Kavallaris; Angus P R Johnston; J Justin Gooding; Simon R Corrie; Ben J Boyd; Pall Thordarson; Andrew K Whittaker; Molly M Stevens; Clive A Prestidge; Christopher J H Porter; Wolfgang J Parak; Thomas P Davis; Edmund J Crampin; Frank Caruso
Journal:  Nat Nanotechnol       Date:  2018-09-06       Impact factor: 39.213

Review 2.  Photothermal therapy and photoacoustic imaging via nanotheranostics in fighting cancer.

Authors:  Yijing Liu; Pravin Bhattarai; Zhifei Dai; Xiaoyuan Chen
Journal:  Chem Soc Rev       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 54.564

3.  Tumor accumulation of liposomal doxorubicin in three murine models: Optimizing delivery efficiency.

Authors:  Charlene M Dawidczyk; Luisa M Russell; Margot Hultz; Peter C Searson
Journal:  Nanomedicine       Date:  2017-02-28       Impact factor: 5.307

4.  Magnetic targeting of paclitaxel-loaded poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid)-based nanoparticles for the treatment of glioblastoma.

Authors:  Lakshmi Pallavi Ganipineni; Bernard Ucakar; Nicolas Joudiou; John Bianco; Pierre Danhier; Mengnan Zhao; Chiara Bastiancich; Bernard Gallez; Fabienne Danhier; Véronique Préat
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2018-08-08

Review 5.  The Hitchhiker's Guide to Human Therapeutic Nanoparticle Development.

Authors:  Thelvia I Ramos; Carlos A Villacis-Aguirre; Katherine V López-Aguilar; Leandro Santiago Padilla; Claudia Altamirano; Jorge R Toledo; Nelson Santiago Vispo
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 6.321

Review 6.  Exploring near-infrared absorbing nanocarriers to overcome cancer drug resistance.

Authors:  Siwei Chu; Ursula Stochaj
Journal:  Cancer Drug Resist       Date:  2020-07-02

Review 7.  Cell Penetrating Peptides as Molecular Carriers for Anti-Cancer Agents.

Authors:  Antonella Borrelli; Anna Lucia Tornesello; Maria Lina Tornesello; Franco M Buonaguro
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 4.411

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.