| Literature DB >> 26248867 |
Simone Gittelson1, Tim Kalafut2, Steven Myers3, Duncan Taylor4, Tacha Hicks5,6, Franco Taroni5, Ian W Evett7, Jo-Anne Bright8, John Buckleton8.
Abstract
The interpretation of complex DNA profiles is facilitated by a Bayesian approach. This approach requires the development of a pair of propositions: one aligned to the prosecution case and one to the defense case. This note explores the issue of proposition setting in an adversarial environment by a series of examples. A set of guidelines generalize how to formulate propositions when there is a single person of interest and when there are multiple individuals of interest. Additional explanations cover how to handle multiple defense propositions, relatives, and the transition from subsource level to activity level propositions. The propositions depend on case information and the allegations of each of the parties. The prosecution proposition is usually known. The authors suggest that a sensible proposition is selected for the defense that is consistent with their stance, if available, and consistent with a realistic defense if their position is not known.Entities:
Keywords: Bayesian approach; DNA mixtures; forensic DNA; forensic science; likelihood ratio; propositions
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26248867 DOI: 10.1111/1556-4029.12907
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Forensic Sci ISSN: 0022-1198 Impact factor: 1.832