Literature DB >> 26245774

Effects of low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation combined with intensive speech therapy on cerebral blood flow in post-stroke aphasia.

Takatoshi Hara1, Masahiro Abo, Kentaro Kobayashi, Motoi Watanabe, Wataru Kakuda, Atushi Senoo.   

Abstract

We provided an intervention to chronic post-stroke aphasic patients using low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (LF-rTMS) guided by a functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) evaluation of language laterality, combined with intensive speech therapy (ST). We performed a single photon emission-computed tomography (SPECT) scan pre- and post-intervention and investigated the relationship between cerebral blood flow (CBF) and language function. Fifty right-handed chronic post-stroke aphasic patients were enrolled in the study. During their 11-day hospital admission, the patients received a 40-min session of 1-Hz LF-rTMS on the left or right hemisphere, according to language localization identified by the fMRI evaluation, and intensive ST daily for 10 days, except for Sunday. A SPECT scan and language evaluation by the Standard Language Test of Aphasia (SLTA) were performed at the time of admission and at 3 months following discharge. We calculated laterality indices (LIs) of regional CBF (rCBF) in 13 language-related Brodmann area (BA) regions of interest. In patients who received LF-rTMS to the intact right hemisphere (RH-LF-rTMS), the improvement in the total SLTA score was significantly correlated with the pre- and post-intervention change of LI (ΔLI) in BA44. In patients who received LF-rTMS to the lesional left hemisphere (LH-LF-rTMS), this association was not observed. Analyses of the SLTA subscales and rCBF ΔLI demonstrated that in the RH-LF-rTMS group, the SLTA Speaking subscale scores were significantly correlated with ΔLIs in BA11, 20, and 21, and the SLTA Writing subscale scores were significantly correlated with ΔLIs in BA6 and 39. Conversely, in the LH-LF-rTMS group, the SLTA Speaking subscale scores were correlated with ΔLI in BA10, and the SLTA Reading subscale scores were significantly correlated with ΔLIs in BA13, 20, 22, and 44. Our results suggest the possibility that fMRI-guided LF-rTMS combined with intensive ST may affect CBF and contribute to the improvement of language function of post-stroke aphasic patients. LF-rTMS to the non-lesional and lesional hemispheres showed a difference in the associations between language performance and CBF. The results indicate that more effective rTMS intervention needs to be explored for patients who show right hemisphere language activation in an fMRI language evaluation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26245774     DOI: 10.1007/s12975-015-0417-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transl Stroke Res        ISSN: 1868-4483            Impact factor:   6.829


  40 in total

1.  Language-related brain function during word repetition in post-stroke aphasics.

Authors:  Masahiro Abo; Atushi Senoo; Shu Watanabe; Satoshi Miyano; Keiko Doseki; Nobuyuki Sasaki; Kazushige Kobayashi; Yoshiaki Kikuchi; Kyozo Yonemoto
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2004-08-26       Impact factor: 1.837

2.  Improved picture naming in chronic aphasia after TMS to part of right Broca's area: an open-protocol study.

Authors:  Margaret A Naeser; Paula I Martin; Marjorie Nicholas; Errol H Baker; Heidi Seekins; Masahito Kobayashi; Hugo Theoret; Felipe Fregni; Jose Maria-Tormos; Jacquie Kurland; Karl W Doron; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.381

3.  Re-organization of language function within the right hemisphere.

Authors:  M Abo; H Takao; K Hashimoto; M Suzuki; N Kaito
Journal:  Eur J Neurol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 6.089

4.  Is the left uncinate fasciculus essential for language? A cerebral stimulation study.

Authors:  Hugues Duffau; Peggy Gatignol; Sylvie Moritz-Gasser; Emmanuel Mandonnet
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2009-03-06       Impact factor: 4.849

5.  Role of the nondominant hemisphere and undamaged area during word repetition in poststroke aphasics. A PET activation study.

Authors:  M Ohyama; M Senda; S Kitamura; K Ishii; M Mishina; A Terashi
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 7.914

6.  Dual-hemisphere repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for rehabilitation of poststroke aphasia: a randomized, double-blind clinical trial.

Authors:  Eman M Khedr; Noha Abo El-Fetoh; Anwer M Ali; Dina H El-Hammady; Hosam Khalifa; Haisam Atta; Ahmed A Karim
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2014-02-06       Impact factor: 3.919

Review 7.  The latest on functional imaging studies of aphasic stroke.

Authors:  Cathy J Price; Jenny Crinion
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 5.710

8.  Subcortical aphasia: a longitudinal PET study.

Authors:  Xavier de Boissezon; Jean-François Démonet; Michèle Puel; Nathalie Marie; Gaëlle Raboyeau; Jean-François Albucher; François Chollet; Dominique Cardebat
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2005-06-02       Impact factor: 7.914

9.  Modulating cortical connectivity in stroke patients by rTMS assessed with fMRI and dynamic causal modeling.

Authors:  Christian Grefkes; Dennis A Nowak; Ling E Wang; Manuel Dafotakis; Simon B Eickhoff; Gereon R Fink
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-12-18       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 10.  Lesion analysis of the brain areas involved in language comprehension.

Authors:  Nina F Dronkers; David P Wilkins; Robert D Van Valin; Brenda B Redfern; Jeri J Jaeger
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2004 May-Jun
View more
  15 in total

1.  Functional Reorganization of Right Prefrontal Cortex Underlies Sustained Naming Improvements in Chronic Aphasia via Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation.

Authors:  Denise Y Harvey; Jamie Podell; Peter E Turkeltaub; Olufunsho Faseyitan; H Branch Coslett; Roy H Hamilton
Journal:  Cogn Behav Neurol       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 1.600

Review 2.  Rehabilitation and the Neural Network After Stroke.

Authors:  Norihito Shimamura; Takeshi Katagai; Kiyohide Kakuta; Naoya Matsuda; Kosuke Katayama; Nozomi Fujiwara; Yuuka Watanabe; Masato Naraoka; Hiroki Ohkuma
Journal:  Transl Stroke Res       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 6.829

3.  Mechanisms, Imaging, and Therapy in Stroke Recovery.

Authors:  Changhong Xing; Kazuhide Hayakawa; Eng H Lo
Journal:  Transl Stroke Res       Date:  2016-10-07       Impact factor: 6.829

4.  Cerebellar Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation for Aphasia Rehabilitation: Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Kai Zheng; Mingyun Chen; Ying Shen; Xinlei Xu; Fanglan Gao; Guilan Huang; Yingying Ji; Bin Su; Da Song; Hui Fang; Peng Liu; Caili Ren
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2022-06-02       Impact factor: 5.702

Review 5.  Evaluation of rTMS in patients with poststroke aphasia: a systematic review and focused meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mehrnaz Gholami; Nooshin Pourbaghi; Samaneh Taghvatalab
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2022-05-02       Impact factor: 3.830

6.  Diagnosing and managing post-stroke aphasia.

Authors:  Shannon M Sheppard; Rajani Sebastian
Journal:  Expert Rev Neurother       Date:  2020-12-10       Impact factor: 4.618

7.  Is Aphasia Treatment Beneficial for the Elderly? A Review of Recent Evidence.

Authors:  Rachel Fabian; Lisa Bunker; Argye E Hillis
Journal:  Curr Phys Med Rehabil Rep       Date:  2020-09-18

8.  Neuromodulation in post-stroke aphasia treatment.

Authors:  Bonnie L Breining; Rajani Sebastian
Journal:  Curr Phys Med Rehabil Rep       Date:  2020-02-22

9.  The production of high dose hydrogen gas by the AMS-H-01 for treatment of disease.

Authors:  Richard Camara; Lei Huang; John H Zhang
Journal:  Med Gas Res       Date:  2016-10-14

10.  High-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation improves functional recovery by inhibiting neurotoxic polarization of astrocytes in ischemic rats.

Authors:  Ye Hong; Qian Liu; Mengna Peng; Maosheng Bai; Juanji Li; Rui Sun; Hongquan Guo; Pengfei Xu; Yi Xie; Yunzi Li; Ling Liu; Juan Du; Xinfeng Liu; Bin Yang; Gelin Xu
Journal:  J Neuroinflammation       Date:  2020-05-06       Impact factor: 8.322

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.