Literature DB >> 26244708

Predicting the Risk for Central Pain Using the Sensory Components of the International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury.

Yuval Levitan1,2, Gabi Zeilig1,3, Moshe Bondi1, Erez Ringler1, Ruth Defrin2,3.   

Abstract

Central neuropathic pain (CP) after spinal cord injury (SCI) is excruciating and difficult to manage. Pre-emptive treatment could be initiated in patients at risk for CP providing that it can be predicted. A combination of psychophysical tests could predict CP, but the process necessitates sophisticated equipment and constant monitoring. A simple predictive tool for CP is required. The aim of this study was to test the predictability for CP of the sensory component of the International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (SC-ISNCSCI), routinely performed on all SCI patients. In an historical-prospective study, the SC-ISNCSCI and background variables were extracted from medical records of 115 SCI patients. In a prospective study, 20 SCI patients underwent the SC-ISNCSCI at admission and were followed-up for 12 months. In both studies, pinprick (PP) and light touch (LT) scores from the SC-ISNCSCI and the difference between them (LT-PP) were compared between those who eventually developed CP and those who did not. Heat-pain and touch thresholds were measured and correlated with the SC-ISNCSCI to test its validity. In both studies, patients who developed CP had, prior to CP, lower PP than LT scores, and lower PP scores than those who did not develop CP. At-level delta LT-PP score>1 best predicted CP; the odds of developing CP with LT-PP>1 was 24.4 times that of the reverse category (LT-PP<1). Heat-pain and touch thresholds significantly correlated with PP and LT. We conclude that the SC-ISNCSCI can be used as a clinical biomarker of CP with high probability.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ASIA; biomarker; central pain; spinal cord injury; spinothalamic

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26244708     DOI: 10.1089/neu.2015.3947

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurotrauma        ISSN: 0897-7151            Impact factor:   5.269


  7 in total

Review 1.  Neuropathic Pain After Spinal Cord Injury: Challenges and Research Perspectives.

Authors:  Rani Shiao; Corinne A Lee-Kubli
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 7.620

Review 2.  Assessments of sensory plasticity after spinal cord injury across species.

Authors:  Jenny Haefeli; J Russell Huie; Kazuhito Morioka; Adam R Ferguson
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2016-12-19       Impact factor: 3.046

Review 3.  Neuropathic pain and spasticity: intricate consequences of spinal cord injury.

Authors:  N B Finnerup
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2017-07-11       Impact factor: 2.772

4.  Increased psychological distress among individuals with spinal cord injury is associated with central neuropathic pain rather than the injury characteristics.

Authors:  Hila Gruener; Gabi Zeilig; Yocheved Laufer; Nava Blumen; Ruth Defrin
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 2.772

5.  The International Spinal Cord Injury Pain Extended Data Set (Version 1.0).

Authors:  E Widerström-Noga; F Biering-Sørensen; T N Bryce; D D Cardenas; N B Finnerup; M P Jensen; J S Richards; E J Richardson; P J Siddall
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2016-04-12       Impact factor: 2.772

Review 6.  Interrelationship of Neurogenic Obesity and Chronic Neuropathic Pain in Persons With Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Felix; David R Gater
Journal:  Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil       Date:  2021

7.  Revisiting the Examination of Sharp/Dull Discrimination as Clinical Measure of Spinothalamic Tract Integrity.

Authors:  Laura Heutehaus; Christian Schuld; Daniela Solinas; Cornelia Hensel; Till Kämmerer; Norbert Weidner; Rüdiger Rupp; Steffen Franz
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 4.003

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.