Literature DB >> 26243559

Clinical Outcomes of Carotid Endarterectomy in Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Patients with Ipsilateral Intracranial Stenosis.

Enzo Ballotta1, Antonio Toniato2, Anna Da Roit2, Claudio Baracchini3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: The risk of perioperative stroke and the benefits of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) remain uncertain in the case of an ipsilateral intracranial stenosis. The aim of this observational study was to analyze the early and late outcomes of CEA in patients with a carotid tandem lesion (CTL), defined as a severe stenosis at the bifurcation with any concomitant lesion ≥50 % involving the intracranial portion of the ipsilateral internal carotid artery or the main trunk of the anterior or middle cerebral artery.
METHODS: From 2000 to 2009, 1143 patients underwent CEA for symptomatic or asymptomatic extracranial carotid stenosis according to the NASCET and ACAS recommendations, respectively. CTLs were diagnosed in 219 patients (19.2 %) by extracranial and transcranial color-coded Doppler sonography combined with noninvasive brain imaging studies. The primary endpoints of the study were perioperative (30-day) stroke and death, and any ipsilateral ischemic adverse events during the follow-up, which ranged from 0.1 to 10 years (mean 4.9 ± 3.3 years). The rates of the primary endpoints were compared between patients with (group I) and without CTL (group II).
RESULTS: Overall, 219 CEAs were performed in group I and 924 in group II. Nearly two in three of the carotid lesions (777 of 1143, 68 %) were symptomatic at presentation (62.1 % in group I vs 69.4 % in group II; p = 0.03), with a 23.8 % rate of stroke (21.9 % in group I vs 24.2 % in group II; p = 0.85). There were 2 (0.9 %) perioperative ipsilateral strokes in group I and 5 (0.5 %) in group II (p = 0.62), and no deaths. The 5-year ipsilateral stroke-free, any stroke-free, and overall survival rates did not differ significantly between patients with and without CTL.
CONCLUSIONS: This study has shown that patients with and without CTL who underwent CEA had a similar occurrence of perioperative adverse events (probably due to the extremely low incidence of perioperative complications) and comparable late outcomes, suggesting that the presence of CTL does not justify refusing CEA for patients who could benefit from it.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26243559     DOI: 10.1007/s00268-015-3165-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  32 in total

Review 1.  Outcomes validity and reliability of the modified Rankin scale: implications for stroke clinical trials: a literature review and synthesis.

Authors:  Jamie L Banks; Charles A Marotta
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2007-02-01       Impact factor: 7.914

2.  2011 ASA/ACCF/AHA/AANN/AANS/ACR/ASNR/CNS/SAIP/SCAI/SIR/SNIS/SVM/SVS guideline on the management of patients with extracranial carotid and vertebral artery disease. A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines, and the American Stroke Association, American Association of Neuroscience Nurses, American Association of Neurological Surgeons, American College of Radiology, American Society of Neuroradiology, Congress of Neurological Surgeons, Society of Atherosclerosis Imaging and Prevention, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Interventional Radiology, Society of NeuroInterventional Surgery, Society for Vascular Medicine, and Society for Vascular Surgery.

Authors:  Thomas G Brott; Jonathan L Halperin; Suhny Abbara; J Michael Bacharach; John D Barr; Ruth L Bush; Christopher U Cates; Mark A Creager; Susan B Fowler; Gary Friday; Vicki S Hertzberg; E Bruce McIff; Wesley S Moore; Peter D Panagos; Thomas S Riles; Robert H Rosenwasser; Allen J Taylor
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2011-01-31       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  Carotid endarterectomy in patients with intracranial vascular disease: short-term risk and long-term outcome.

Authors:  W C Mackey; T F O'Donnell; A D Callow
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 4.268

4.  Is siphon disease important in predicting outcome of carotid endarterectomy?

Authors:  G O Roederer; Y E Langlois; A R Chan; P M Chikos; B L Thiele; D E Strandness
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1983-10

5.  Intracranial occlusions and internal carotid artery stenoses: clinical implications.

Authors:  Mirosław Stelagowski; Katarzyna Bogusiak; Anna Kasielska; Marek Łysakowski; Piotr Kaźmierski; Małgorzata Szostek
Journal:  Ann Vasc Surg       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 1.466

6.  The influence of carotid siphon stenosis on short- and long-term outcome after carotid endarterectomy.

Authors:  M A Mattos; P S van Bemmelen; K J Hodgson; L D Barkmeier; D E Ramsey; D S Sumner
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 4.268

7.  Assessment of >/=50% and <50% intracranial stenoses by transcranial color-coded duplex sonography.

Authors:  R W Baumgartner; H P Mattle; G Schroth
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 7.914

8.  Prevention of disabling and fatal strokes by successful carotid endarterectomy in patients without recent neurological symptoms: randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  A Halliday; A Mansfield; J Marro; C Peto; R Peto; J Potter; D Thomas
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2004-05-08       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis.

Authors:  H J M Barnett; D W Taylor; R B Haynes; D L Sackett; S J Peerless; G G Ferguson; A J Fox; R N Rankin; V C Hachinski; D O Wiebers; M Eliasziw
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1991-08-15       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Clinical and angiographic predictors of stroke and death from carotid endarterectomy: systematic review.

Authors:  P M Rothwell; J Slattery; C P Warlow
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1997-12-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.